Socialist PM for Spain

[Guest]

Don't you realise when someone is taking the piss out of you ???

Clearly not.

[MungoBrush]

Don't you realise when someone is taking the piss out of you ???

So I guess that's a NO then.
You have no proper references that I can read to backup your post.
Not one single economist?
FAIL

[Guest]

Don't you realise when someone is taking the piss out of you ???

So I guess that's a NO then.
You have no proper references that I can read to backup your post.
Not one single economist?
FAIL

What, like your fail of trying to prove we as a state were absolutely bankrupt?

Not one singkle economist or link that worked.

[MungoBrush]

Don't you realise when someone is taking the piss out of you ???

So I guess that's a NO then.
You have no proper references that I can read to backup your post.
Not one single economist?
FAIL

So your post was complete rubbish.

[Brad and Dan]

quote="MungoBrush"]What got me thinking is that Corbyn said that he would never press that button
No British politician of any colour has ever said that before
I can imagine Jesus saying that

And there are other parallels as well

Jesus told everyone to pay their taxes
Jeremy wants to stop tax evasion

Jesus healed the sick
Jeremy wants more money for the NHS

Jesus spent his life teaching
Jeremy wants more state schools for all

Jesus fed the 5000
Jeremy wants to end poverty[/quote]

Quite right.

Politically Jesus was close to Gandhi, Corbyn and MLK. Conservatives however call him a Communist when that is patently untrue.

Good call.

[Cannydc]

Maudling's dash for growth 1963–64;
Barber's boom, 1972–73;
The Lawson boom, 1986–88.

Since Mungo's brain cell is on holiday, here's a quick resumee of Tory efforts to encourage quick economic growth...

Maudling's dash for growth 1963–64;

Marked a new departure for economic policy. It was the first attempt to go for a 'dash for growth' and break out of the balance of payments constraint that had frustrated previous attempts to raise the rate of economic growth. Taxes substantially reduced.

Barber's boom, 1972–73;

What, in effect, he said in his Budget speech was that he proposed to let the economy rip on in its present fashion for another year, hoping that, during this period, all would come right, growth would be achieved, investment would rise and — aided by the statutory controls on wages and some prices which the Government has introduced recently — inflation would be tamed. The Chancellor has deliberately stood aside from the economy, and abandoned any pretence that he can control its operations. Mr Barber, it is clear, believes that his earlier budgets have laid the foundations of economic expansion, and he has the nerve to do no more now than tinker. His neutralism constitutes a far bigger gamble than did Mr Maudling's famous dash for growth in 1963 and 1964, when a huge balance of payments deficit was simply ignored.

The Lawson boom, 1986–88.

The Lawson Boom is a term used to describe the macroeconomic conditions prevailing in the United Kingdom at the end of the 1980s, which became associated with the policies of Margaret Thatcher's Chancellor of the Exchequer, Nigel Lawson. It was a classic example of a 'boom and bust' economic cycle. The late 1980s were a period of rapid economic expansion. This was caused by rising house prices, tax cuts, lower interest rates and high confidence. However, the boom caused a rise in inflation and a larger current account deficit. Policies to tackle this inflation caused the recession of 1991-92.

There you go, Mungo. Hope the words aren't too big for you.

https://econ.economicshelp.org/2008/01/ ... 1980s.html

https://www.cps.org.uk/blog/q/date/2012 ... e-the-war/

https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... omicgrowth

[MungoBrush]

Maudling's dash for growth 1963–64;
Barber's boom, 1972–73;
The Lawson boom, 1986–88.

Since Mungo's brain cell is on holiday, here's a quick resumee of Tory efforts to encourage quick economic growth...

Maudling's dash for growth 1963–64;

Marked a new departure for economic policy. It was the first attempt to go for a 'dash for growth' and break out of the balance of payments constraint that had frustrated previous attempts to raise the rate of economic growth. Taxes substantially reduced.

Barber's boom, 1972–73;

What, in effect, he said in his Budget speech was that he proposed to let the economy rip on in its present fashion for another year, hoping that, during this period, all would come right, growth would be achieved, investment would rise and — aided by the statutory controls on wages and some prices which the Government has introduced recently — inflation would be tamed. The Chancellor has deliberately stood aside from the economy, and abandoned any pretence that he can control its operations. Mr Barber, it is clear, believes that his earlier budgets have laid the foundations of economic expansion, and he has the nerve to do no more now than tinker. His neutralism constitutes a far bigger gamble than did Mr Maudling's famous dash for growth in 1963 and 1964, when a huge balance of payments deficit was simply ignored.

The Lawson boom, 1986–88.

The Lawson Boom is a term used to describe the macroeconomic conditions prevailing in the United Kingdom at the end of the 1980s, which became associated with the policies of Margaret Thatcher's Chancellor of the Exchequer, Nigel Lawson. It was a classic example of a 'boom and bust' economic cycle. The late 1980s were a period of rapid economic expansion. This was caused by rising house prices, tax cuts, lower interest rates and high confidence. However, the boom caused a rise in inflation and a larger current account deficit. Policies to tackle this inflation caused the recession of 1991-92.

There you go, Mungo. Hope the words aren't too big for you.

https://econ.economicshelp.org/2008/01/ ... 1980s.html

https://www.cps.org.uk/blog/q/date/2012 ... e-the-war/

https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... omicgrowth

Are you actually responding to your own proposal?
Did you actually read any of those articles?
You said that perhaps the new Spanish PM could reduce the goverment's debt from 98% down to the EU level of 60% by growing the economy.
They say nothing in support of your case.

I don't think that you have any conception about macro-economic theory
So I suggest that you stop posting such nonsense.
The new Spanish PM is obviously much smarter than you - thank goodness.

[Gigabit]

Mungo is a such a moron hahahahahaha

[MungoBrush]

Mungo is a such a moron hahahahahaha

Thank you
Yet another intelligent contribution from the village idiot
Keep it up.

[Guest]

Mungo is a such a moron hahahahahaha

Thank you
Yet another intelligent contribution from the village idiot
Keep it up.

You haven't made any intelligent contributions Tory scum, you have just posted lies and falsehoods.

[Cannydc]

Cannydc wrote:
Again, you have no idea whatsoever which steps he will take to reduce the Spanish deficit.
He may even go for growth ...

Mungo wrote:
How does that work then?
Got any proper references to back that up?

Just a reminder of Mungo's post, which I replied to showing three separate instances of "how that worked" under Tory chancellors - surely great references in his eyes ?

It appears he can't even remember what his question was.....

[MungoBrush]

Cannydc wrote:
Again, you have no idea whatsoever which steps he will take to reduce the Spanish deficit.
He may even go for growth ...

Mungo wrote:
How does that work then?
Got any proper references to back that up?

Just a reminder of Mungo's post, which I replied to showing three separate instances of "how that worked" under Tory chancellors - surely great references in his eyes ?

It appears he can't even remember what his question was.....

Just post a link to the econometric model that shows how you can reduce the government deficit and grow the economy at the same time.
Otherwise I'll just assume that you haven't a clue what you are talking about.

[McAz]

Cannydc wrote:
Again, you have no idea whatsoever which steps he will take to reduce the Spanish deficit.
He may even go for growth ...

Mungo wrote:
How does that work then?
Got any proper references to back that up?

Just a reminder of Mungo's post, which I replied to showing three separate instances of "how that worked" under Tory chancellors - surely great references in his eyes ?

It appears he can't even remember what his question was.....

Just post a link to the econometric model that shows how you can reduce the government deficit and grow the economy at the same time.
Otherwise I'll just assume that you haven't a clue what you are talking about.

Perhaps Corbyn the Messiah can help?

[MungoBrush]

Mungo is a such a moron hahahahahaha

Thank you
Yet another intelligent contribution from the village idiot
Keep it up.

You haven't made any intelligent contributions Tory scum, you have just posted lies and falsehoods.

Hey you with the bag
You seem to be halucinating
Your brain is starved of oxygen
It's making you post drivel

[MungoBrush]

Cannydc wrote:
Again, you have no idea whatsoever which steps he will take to reduce the Spanish deficit.
He may even go for growth ...

Mungo wrote:
How does that work then?
Got any proper references to back that up?

Just a reminder of Mungo's post, which I replied to showing three separate instances of "how that worked" under Tory chancellors - surely great references in his eyes ?

It appears he can't even remember what his question was.....

Just post a link to the econometric model that shows how you can reduce the government deficit and grow the economy at the same time.
Otherwise I'll just assume that you haven't a clue what you are talking about.

Perhaps Corbyn the Messiah can help?

It will take more than a miracle to achieve what Cannydc is proposing.