MungoBrush wrote:McAz wrote:The term "Sunderland Massive" is our local generic for Brexit voters - it has nothing to do with Sunderland as such.
And Sunderland being a safe Labour seat
Guest wrote:Torys increasing funding IN EXCESS of that suggested on the leave bus. Stuff like this is possible when the economy is managed competently.
Cannydc wrote:Guest wrote:Torys increasing funding IN EXCESS of that suggested on the leave bus. Stuff like this is possible when the economy is managed competently.
Stuff like this is possible by harvesting the Magic Money Tree and relying on a non-existent Brexit Bonus - as admitted already by plenty of Tories.
[/quote]McAz wrote:Cannydc wrote:Guest wrote:Torys increasing funding IN EXCESS of that suggested on the leave bus. Stuff like this is possible when the economy is managed competently.
Stuff like this is possible by harvesting the Magic Money Tree and relying on a non-existent Brexit Bonus - as admitted already by plenty of Tories.
It is not possible without increasing the tax burden on the poorest. It is nothing to do with a Brexit Bonus.
“The Brexit dividend tosh was expected but treats the public as fools. Sad to see government slide to populist arguments rather than evidence on such an important issue. This will make it harder to have a rational debate about the ‘who & how’ of funding and sharing this fairly.”
(Sarah Wollaston, Conservative Chair of the Commons Health and Social Care Committee)
Cannydc wrote:McAz wrote:Cannydc wrote:Guest wrote:Torys increasing funding IN EXCESS of that suggested on the leave bus. Stuff like this is possible when the economy is managed competently.
Stuff like this is possible by harvesting the Magic Money Tree and relying on a non-existent Brexit Bonus - as admitted already by plenty of Tories.
It is not possible without increasing the tax burden on the poorest. It is nothing to do with a Brexit Bonus.
“The Brexit dividend tosh was expected but treats the public as fools. Sad to see government slide to populist arguments rather than evidence on such an important issue. This will make it harder to have a rational debate about the ‘who & how’ of funding and sharing this fairly.”
(Sarah Wollaston, Conservative Chair of the Commons Health and Social Care Committee)
Tories stealing another Labour policy by BORROWING MORE, TAXING MORE and INVESTING IN PUBLIC SERVICES ?
Sacrilege.
Guest wrote:Torys increasing funding IN EXCESS of that suggested on the leave bus. Stuff like this is possible when the economy is managed competently.
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Guest wrote:Torys increasing funding IN EXCESS of that suggested on the leave bus. Stuff like this is possible when the economy is managed competently.
The economy is in the shitter!
McAz wrote:Taxpayers will contribute ‘a bit more’: May lays out NHS funding plan
Tax rises to support a £20.5 billion-a-year boost to the NHS budget will be “fair and balanced”, Theresa May has vowed.
(PA 18.6.18)
As "fair and balanced" as they have been so far - and as the FT reports?
"Income inequality is likely to increase during the next four years by the most since Margaret Thatcher was prime minister, according to a report from the Resolution Foundation think-tank.
Inflation, poor wage growth and the government’s changes to taxation and spending are likely to lead to a bigger squeeze in living standards for those on low incomes over the course of the current parliament, the report says."
Cannydc wrote:Let's see where they go when Nissan, Honda and Toyota finally run out of patience.
Treeza's already tried bribes, but Japanese executives are nobodies fools. They won't wear import / export tariffs on the parts that go into their cars.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests