More Novichok?

Re: More Novichok?

Postby Fletch » Mon Oct 08, 2018 7:44 pm

Everything Is A Hoax By Paul Craig Roberts

An Israeli expert on terrorism and covert assassination procedures explains that the alleged Russian GRU attack on the Skripals with a supposedly deadly nerve agent is a completely obvious hoax to anyone who knows anything at all.

The official story, says the expert, is “stupidity on stupidity.”

I agree with him.

The question is: Why did the British government think that they could get away with such an obvious hoax? The answer is that the people in Western countries don’t know anything about anything. They live in a world in which their reality is a product of the propaganda fed to them by “news organizations” and Hollywood movies. They only receive controlled explanations. Therefore, they know nothing about how anything really functions. Read the account by the Israeli expert to understand the vast difference between the British government’s hoax and the reality of how an assassination is conducted.

The Israeli expert got me to wondering why

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50390.htm

Does anyone still believe the official version? :ooer:

For any that do, maybe they also think Dr David Kelly really did find a tree and commit suicide...
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 16271
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: More Novichok?

Postby Rolluplostinspace » Mon Oct 08, 2018 9:28 pm

I haven't believed this stuff since the beginning which is probably obvious from my posts.
User avatar
Rolluplostinspace
 
Posts: 18689
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: More Novichok?

Postby MungoBrush » Tue Oct 09, 2018 9:18 am

Fletch wrote:Everything Is A Hoax By Paul Craig Roberts

An Israeli expert on terrorism and covert assassination procedures explains that the alleged Russian GRU attack on the Skripals with a supposedly deadly nerve agent is a completely obvious hoax to anyone who knows anything at all.

The official story, says the expert, is “stupidity on stupidity.”

I agree with him.

The question is: Why did the British government think that they could get away with such an obvious hoax? The answer is that the people in Western countries don’t know anything about anything. They live in a world in which their reality is a product of the propaganda fed to them by “news organizations” and Hollywood movies. They only receive controlled explanations. Therefore, they know nothing about how anything really functions. Read the account by the Israeli expert to understand the vast difference between the British government’s hoax and the reality of how an assassination is conducted.

The Israeli expert got me to wondering why

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50390.htm

Does anyone still believe the official version? :ooer:

For any that do, maybe they also think Dr David Kelly really did find a tree and commit suicide...


And the woman who died
Was she part of the hoax too?
User avatar
MungoBrush
 
Posts: 5066
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 9:03 pm

Re: More Novichok?

Postby Cobs » Tue Oct 09, 2018 12:37 pm

Fletch wrote:http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50390.htm

Does anyone still believe the official version? :ooer:

For any that do, maybe they also think Dr David Kelly really did find a tree and commit suicide...

You seriously linked that? It's the fucking twilight zone. Actual jet fuel can't melt steel beams stuff.

'Moreover, it was impossible for Mossad to pull off such an attack without high level support in the US government. Only a US official could have ordered the numerous simulations of the attack underway in order to confuse the air traffic controllers and the US Air Force.'
User avatar
Cobs
 
Posts: 2365
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:53 pm

Re: More Novichok?

Postby Fletch » Tue Oct 09, 2018 5:23 pm

Cobs wrote:
Fletch wrote:http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50390.htm

Does anyone still believe the official version? :ooer:

For any that do, maybe they also think Dr David Kelly really did find a tree and commit suicide...

You seriously linked that? It's the fucking twilight zone. Actual jet fuel can't melt steel beams stuff.

'Moreover, it was impossible for Mossad to pull off such an attack without high level support in the US government. Only a US official could have ordered the numerous simulations of the attack underway in order to confuse the air traffic controllers and the US Air Force.'


At least you admit to being gullible, even proud of it, it seems. I daresay you have no idea who Paul Craig Roberts is either. Best you stick to being told what to think by the msm, it's easier. :thumbsup:
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 16271
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: More Novichok?

Postby Fletch » Tue Oct 09, 2018 5:29 pm

RELEASING SKRIPAL INVESTIGATION REPORTS BELLINGCAT EXPOSES ITSELF AS MOUTHPIECE OF WESTERN INTELLIGENCE SERIVCES

Sum up

The MSM and Belligcat itself continue to claim that that Bellingcat is an “open-source” investigative website, which has no links to governments and special services. The only problem is that a significant part of the Skripal case “investigation” is data, including documents, which cannot be obtained from “open sources”.

The articles released by Bellingcat The Insider have no answers to the key questions:

How they obtained the passport scans, screenshots of other documents and extracts from the passport data for their inveistigation?

If this data was not directly provided to Belligcat and The Insider by some side, how did Belligcat and The Insider established communication channels with persons who have access to this data?

These questions remain open and it’s unlikely that they will be answered anytime soon. Most likely, Bellingcat and The Insider just received this data directly from persons or entities linked to US, British special services or through channels establsihed by US, British special services in Russia. Using these data, Bellingcat destroyed its own image of “open-source” investigation website, which the MSM has created for it in the Western audience over the past few years.

https://southfront.org/releasing-skripa ... -serivces/
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 16271
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: More Novichok?

Postby Cobs » Tue Oct 09, 2018 7:20 pm

Fletch wrote:
Cobs wrote:
Fletch wrote:http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50390.htm

Does anyone still believe the official version? :ooer:

For any that do, maybe they also think Dr David Kelly really did find a tree and commit suicide...

You seriously linked that? It's the fucking twilight zone. Actual jet fuel can't melt steel beams stuff.

'Moreover, it was impossible for Mossad to pull off such an attack without high level support in the US government. Only a US official could have ordered the numerous simulations of the attack underway in order to confuse the air traffic controllers and the US Air Force.'


At least you admit to being gullible, even proud of it, it seems. I daresay you have no idea who Paul Craig Roberts is either. Best you stick to being told what to think by the msm, it's easier. :thumbsup:

He thinks 9/11 was an inside job so yeah, it's probably for the best. :ohdear:
User avatar
Cobs
 
Posts: 2365
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:53 pm

Re: More Novichok?

Postby Rolluplostinspace » Sun Apr 21, 2019 10:01 pm

The Official Skripal Story is a Dead Duck
One of the striking things about the official Skripal story is the way its more wildly improbable aspects have been released to the mainstream media over a long period, so as to manage their impact. So, for example, police acknowledgement that the perfume bottle Charlie Rowley found was sealed and could not have been the container used on the Skripals is comparatively recent, and it took nine months for us to learn that, by a truly wonderful coincidence, the first person to find the Skripals ill on the bench was the Chief Nurse of the British Army.

I covered these points in full in my article on the ten points I do not believe in the official story – an article which nobody has sought to refute, other than to yell “conspiracy theory”, as though that was an argument.

But today we learn from the Guardian (quoting the New York Times) that Donald Trump was only convinced to back the UK government line after being shown photos of dead ducks and hospitalised children by CIA director Gina Haspel.


The problem is that, there were no hospitalised children. No children have been reported as becoming ill following their duck feeding with the Skripals. We have heard from one of the parents that they were shown by the police extremely clear CCTV footage of the duck feeding, which has never been made public. Surely if the child had been hospitalised, the parent would have been mentioned it?

There were no hospitalised children.

We also know that the duck feeding was the time that “Boshirov and Petrov” were physically closest to the Skripals. But this is the first time there has ever been any mention of any harm to the ducks. Dead ducks would have been noticed by the public.

Possibly the Guardian and New York Times are inventing utter drivel, as in the Manafort meeting Assange story. That would in itself be worrying. The other possibility is that the security services produced fake photographs of hospitalised children and slaughtered some ducks, in order to convince Donald Trump. If the latter explanation is true, then the entire Skripal saga looks more and more staged. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51465.htm
User avatar
Rolluplostinspace
 
Posts: 18689
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: More Novichok?

Postby Rolluplostinspace » Sun Apr 21, 2019 10:15 pm

.....
Attachments
toxinremoval.png
User avatar
Rolluplostinspace
 
Posts: 18689
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:12 pm

Previous

Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests