Dogs Sleeping Forum

by **Rolluplostinspace** » Sat Aug 18, 2018 5:59 pm

It won't be a state controlled press though will it you fucking cowards.
It will be a press with a different set of regulations than the regulations they mostly ignore now so that the likes of Raven and Viper can salivate over untruths and make complete twats of themselves over again and again and again and ....

by **MungoBrush** » Sun Aug 19, 2018 7:39 pm

Rolluplostinspace wrote:It won't be a state controlled press though will it you fucking cowards.
It will be a press with a different set of regulations than the regulations they mostly ignore now so that the likes of Raven and Viper can salivate over untruths and make complete twats of themselves over again and again and again and ....

I'm afraid that you are wrong:

"Jeremy Corbyn’s ‘change is coming’ warning to the press is chilling"
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/02/j ... -chilling/

"Corbyn has freedom of the press in his sights"
https://www.express.co.uk/comment/colum ... -McKINSTRY

"Labour used to court the tabloids. Now it picks fights with them"
https://www.economist.com/britain/2018/ ... -with-them

by **Gigabit** » Sun Aug 19, 2018 7:43 pm

If what a self-regulating "free" press means is printing lies and hatred then I don't want a free press.

by **MungoBrush** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 1:41 pm

Gigabit wrote:If what a self-regulating "free" press means is printing lies and hatred then I don't want a free press.

So only government approved stories to be published?
Welcome to the socialist/nazi world

by **Cannydc** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:36 pm

MungoBrush wrote:
Gigabit wrote:If what a self-regulating "free" press means is printing lies and hatred then I don't want a free press.

So only government approved stories to be published?
Welcome to the socialist/nazi world

We get that now in most of our so-called "newspapers"

Welcome to Tory World.

by **Guest** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 4:20 pm

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 40% (+1)
LAB: 40% (-)
LDEM: 8% (-)
UKIP: 6% (-)
GRN: 2% (-1)

via
@ICMResearch
, 17 - 19 Aug

by **LordRaven** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 5:00 pm

Guest wrote:Westminster voting intention:

CON: 40% (+1)
LAB: 40% (-)
LDEM: 8% (-)
UKIP: 6% (-)
GRN: 2% (-1)

via
@ICMResearch
, 17 - 19 Aug

That sounds about right, both currently equally as crap as each other

by **MungoBrush** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 9:16 pm

Cannydc wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Gigabit wrote:If what a self-regulating "free" press means is printing lies and hatred then I don't want a free press.

So only government approved stories to be published?
Welcome to the socialist/nazi world

We get that now in most of our so-called "newspapers"

Welcome to Tory World.

Press censorship - Corbyn style progresses:

"Corbyn floats plan for windfall tax on tech firms to fund journalism"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45271286

The sinister face of socialism.

by **LordRaven** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 9:50 pm

MungoBrush wrote:
Cannydc wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Gigabit wrote:If what a self-regulating "free" press means is printing lies and hatred then I don't want a free press.

So only government approved stories to be published?
Welcome to the socialist/nazi world

We get that now in most of our so-called "newspapers"

Welcome to Tory World.

Press censorship - Corbyn style progresses:

"Corbyn floats plan for windfall tax on tech firms to fund journalism"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45271286

The sinister face of socialism.

1984?

by **Rolluplostinspace** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 9:56 pm

LordRaven wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Cannydc wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Gigabit wrote:If what a self-regulating "free" press means is printing lies and hatred then I don't want a free press.

So only government approved stories to be published?
Welcome to the socialist/nazi world

We get that now in most of our so-called "newspapers"

Welcome to Tory World.

Press censorship - Corbyn style progresses:

"Corbyn floats plan for windfall tax on tech firms to fund journalism"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45271286

The sinister face of socialism.

1984?

The press you currently prefer have lied about Afghanistan Iraq Syria Libya Palestine Israel Syria Yemen and just about everything else but you didn't mention 1984.

by **Cannydc** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 10:24 pm

How on earth is "floating a plan for windfall tax on tech firms to fund journalism" equating to press censorship?

Wouldn't making journalism more available as a profession lead to wider story coverage and therefore better balance?

Oh wait...... of course no Tory wants that.

by **LordRaven** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 10:25 pm

Rolluplostinspace wrote:
LordRaven wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Cannydc wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
So only government approved stories to be published?
Welcome to the socialist/nazi world

We get that now in most of our so-called "newspapers"

Welcome to Tory World.

Press censorship - Corbyn style progresses:

"Corbyn floats plan for windfall tax on tech firms to fund journalism"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45271286

The sinister face of socialism.

1984?

The press you currently prefer have lied about Afghanistan Iraq Syria Libya Palestine Israel Syria Yemen and just about everything else but you didn't mention 1984.

Try and keep up son, I was remarking on the fact that state owned press is very Orwellian. FFS!!! :shake head:

by **LordRaven** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 10:26 pm

Cannydc wrote:How on earth is "floating a plan for windfall tax on tech firms to fund journalism" equating to press censorship?

Wouldn't making journalism more available as a profession lead to wider story coverage and therefore better balance?

Oh wait...... of course no Tory wants that.

It is all boring crap, we are heading for a cliff and all people do is bicker about unimportant shite? Ridiculous!

by **Cannydc** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 10:32 pm

LordRaven wrote:
Cannydc wrote:How on earth is "floating a plan for windfall tax on tech firms to fund journalism" equating to press censorship?

Wouldn't making journalism more available as a profession lead to wider story coverage and therefore better balance?

Oh wait...... of course no Tory wants that.

It is all boring crap, we are heading for a cliff and all people do is bicker about unimportant shite? Ridiculous!

It's all news.

There have been plenty of Brexit threads if you wish to contribute.

by **LordRaven** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 10:40 pm

Cannydc wrote:
LordRaven wrote:
Cannydc wrote:How on earth is "floating a plan for windfall tax on tech firms to fund journalism" equating to press censorship?

Wouldn't making journalism more available as a profession lead to wider story coverage and therefore better balance?

Oh wait...... of course no Tory wants that.

It is all boring crap, we are heading for a cliff and all people do is bicker about unimportant shite? Ridiculous!

It's all news.

There have been plenty of Brexit threads if you wish to contribute.

I am so fed up with Brexit, it's destroying peoples lives and yet onwards we go? Utter madness

Dogs Sleeping Forum

We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Re: We have to elect Corbyn

Who is online