Tory Scum

[LordRaven]

Has your "man with special needs in a sheltered home" turned up yet, Mungo?

Can someone else please have a go? I can't believe that McAz is that thick.
My wife was a carer for a man with special needs in a sheltered home and even he understood it.

You contend that...

Maybe they should be focussing their anger on the vile parents who created the need for their kids to be put into care in the first place.
They need to learn that you just can't dump your kids and expect the rest of us to pick up the tab
The parents should be forced to pay child support to cover the costs.

And you have linked to your preference that parents who cannot pay should ultimately be imprisoned.

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and-money/help-with-debt/dealing-with-urgent-debts/dealing-with-council-tax-arrears/

And you are unable to answer my question - If parents cannot afford it - who pays, and what with?

So please put on your "man with special needs in a sheltered home" who can answer my question.

raven probably drinks in the same pub as him.

I have plenty of watering holes BC, try and a be a bit more specific

[jra]

"I expect that like with any political party, they'll make various proposals and/or commitments and then just go and do their own thing once they get voted in.

It's the classic case of saying you'll do something rather than actually doing it."

But that isn't what happened under recent Labour governments that actually have a very good record of keeping to their pledges.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk_ ... 959867.stm

Not really from that link.

[Cannydc]

"I expect that like with any political party, they'll make various proposals and/or commitments and then just go and do their own thing once they get voted in.

It's the classic case of saying you'll do something rather than actually doing it."

But that isn't what happened under recent Labour governments that actually have a very good record of keeping to their pledges.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk_ ... 959867.stm

Not really from that link.

Yes, really from that link.

Lords reform 1 - Pledge met

Lords reform 2 - Pledge partly met (met later)

Lords reform 3 - Pledge met

HoC modernisation - Pledge met

PMQs made more effective - Debatable

Ministerial accountability - attempted, not met

EU legislation scrutiny - Pledge partly met

Nolan recommendations - Not met fully by 2001

Political donation sources - Pledge met

Foreign funding of parties - Pledge partly met

Referendum on voting system - came later

Introduce FOI Act - Pledge met

Devolve power to Scorland and Wales - Pledge met

Mayor elected for London - Pledge met

Regional assemblies - Pledge not met

Elected mayors in cities - Pledge met

Government grant - Pledge met (2003)

Council tendering - Pledge met

Councillors elected annually - Pledge not met

So that's 11 met, 4 partly met, 1 debatable, 1 came later, 3 not met.

[measurer]

Latest - COMMONS COUP Theresa May bows to Remainer MPs AGAIN by allowing vote for softer Brexit and second referendum
Theresa May gave in to a rebellion of Remainer MPs and agreed to hold a string of so-called 'indicative votes' on the future of Brexit

[Rolluplostinspace]

[youtube][/youtube]American yes but I thought it would well in this thread.
A man paid twenty five million dollars a year should be able to answer such a simple question first time but no all we get is I don't know .... I'll have to think about it meaning he doesn't care and has never thought about it ....

Congresswoman grills billionaire CEO over pay disparity at JP Morgan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WLuuCM6Ej0

[jra]

"I expect that like with any political party, they'll make various proposals and/or commitments and then just go and do their own thing once they get voted in.

It's the classic case of saying you'll do something rather than actually doing it."

But that isn't what happened under recent Labour governments that actually have a very good record of keeping to their pledges.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk_ ... 959867.stm

Not really from that link.

Yes, really from that link.

Lords reform 1 - Pledge met

Lords reform 2 - Pledge partly met (met later)

Lords reform 3 - Pledge met

HoC modernisation - Pledge met

PMQs made more effective - Debatable

Ministerial accountability - attempted, not met

EU legislation scrutiny - Pledge partly met

Nolan recommendations - Not met fully by 2001

Political donation sources - Pledge met

Foreign funding of parties - Pledge partly met

Referendum on voting system - came later

Introduce FOI Act - Pledge met

Devolve power to Scorland and Wales - Pledge met

Mayor elected for London - Pledge met

Regional assemblies - Pledge not met

Elected mayors in cities - Pledge met

Government grant - Pledge met (2003)

Council tendering - Pledge met

Councillors elected annually - Pledge not met

So that's 11 met, 4 partly met, 1 debatable, 1 came later, 3 not met.

12/11 met, 8/9 not.

Not what I'd describe as very good.

[Stooo]

[Guest]

[Guest]

I've seen 'Piss off Tory Scum' a few times!!!!

[Guest]

phpBB [video]

Video


Thick Tory bastard!!!

[Guest]

[Guest]

[Stooo]

Gavin Williamson sacked, presumably because he can't hold his piss let alone official secrets...

[Cannydc]

Gavin Williamson sacked, presumably because he can't hold his piss let alone official secrets...

Wonderful - one of her worst appointments (were there any good ones?) - but a DEFENCE SECRETARY who can't keep his mouth shut???

Words fail me.

But at least he won't be leader.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/bl ... -live-news

[Stooo]

Gavin Williamson sacked, presumably because he can't hold his piss let alone official secrets...

Wonderful - one of her worst appointments (were there any good ones?) - but a DEFENCE SECRETARY who can't keep his mouth shut???

Words fail me.

But at least he won't be leader.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/bl ... -live-news

Grayling next with a bit of luck.