Tory Scum

Re: Tory Scum

Postby Stooo » Fri Feb 08, 2019 10:40 pm

MungoBrush wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Scumbag Chope, the Tory misogynist is at it again. First upskirting, now FGM.

Horrific human being - wonder what his grandchildren will make of 'what grandfather did in parliament'.

https://twitter.com/Independent/status/ ... 8478536710


"He said he had not been objecting to the substance of the issue, but wanted to see all legislation properly debated."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47173445

What's to debate I wonder?
FGM is already illegal
Mutilation of babies whether FGM or circumcision should be subject to the highest code of criminal acts.


He lets everything through that isn't about women or the other people. You can't have too many laws against FGM or other human rights abuses.
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 92052
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:24 pm
Location: Bollocks To Brexit

Re: Tory Scum

Postby MungoBrush » Sun Feb 10, 2019 1:08 pm

Stooo wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Scumbag Chope, the Tory misogynist is at it again. First upskirting, now FGM.

Horrific human being - wonder what his grandchildren will make of 'what grandfather did in parliament'.

https://twitter.com/Independent/status/ ... 8478536710


"He said he had not been objecting to the substance of the issue, but wanted to see all legislation properly debated."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47173445

What's to debate I wonder?
FGM is already illegal
Mutilation of babies whether FGM or circumcision should be subject to the highest code of criminal acts.


You can't have too many laws against FGM or other human rights abuses.


"Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23698885
User avatar
MungoBrush
 
Posts: 1949
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:03 pm

Re: Tory Scum

Postby Cannydc » Sun Feb 10, 2019 5:34 pm

MungoBrush wrote:
Stooo wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Scumbag Chope, the Tory misogynist is at it again. First upskirting, now FGM.

Horrific human being - wonder what his grandchildren will make of 'what grandfather did in parliament'.

https://twitter.com/Independent/status/ ... 8478536710


"He said he had not been objecting to the substance of the issue, but wanted to see all legislation properly debated."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47173445

What's to debate I wonder?
FGM is already illegal
Mutilation of babies whether FGM or circumcision should be subject to the highest code of criminal acts.


You can't have too many laws against FGM or other human rights abuses.


"Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23698885


An abstract paper written by Attorneys for the Rights of the Child - A California based group of ambulance chasers who specialise in "where there's a blame, there's a claim" children's litigation cases.

Not exactly an unbiased source.
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 14866
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:59 pm

Re: Tory Scum

Postby MungoBrush » Sun Feb 10, 2019 6:29 pm

Cannydc wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Stooo wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Scumbag Chope, the Tory misogynist is at it again. First upskirting, now FGM.

Horrific human being - wonder what his grandchildren will make of 'what grandfather did in parliament'.

https://twitter.com/Independent/status/ ... 8478536710


"He said he had not been objecting to the substance of the issue, but wanted to see all legislation properly debated."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47173445

What's to debate I wonder?
FGM is already illegal
Mutilation of babies whether FGM or circumcision should be subject to the highest code of criminal acts.


You can't have too many laws against FGM or other human rights abuses.


"Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23698885


An abstract paper written by Attorneys for the Rights of the Child - A California based group of ambulance chasers who specialise in "where there's a blame, there's a claim" children's litigation cases.

Not exactly an unbiased source.


So you support the mutilation of babies do you?
User avatar
MungoBrush
 
Posts: 1949
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:03 pm

Re: Tory Scum

Postby Cannydc » Sun Feb 10, 2019 6:41 pm

You seem to be unhealthily obsessed with circumcision.

I answered that question previously, I am against it as a fashion statement, or for religious reasons, but there are good reasons in certain parts of the world where it still has relevance in prevention of the spread of HIV through unprotected heterosexual sex. And it is a much more serious op for a 12 year old than a baby, which has to be taken into account.

However, your 'source' was completely biased shite.
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 14866
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:59 pm

Re: Tory Scum

Postby jra » Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:38 pm

Cannydc wrote:You seem to be unhealthily obsessed with circumcision.

I answered that question previously, I am against it as a fashion statement, or for religious reasons, but there are good reasons in certain parts of the world where it still has relevance in prevention of the spread of HIV through unprotected heterosexual sex. And it is a much more serious op for a 12 year old than a baby, which has to be taken into account.

However, your 'source' was completely biased shite.


So biased article or not, is circumcision without consent in babies and infants for whatever reason an issue?
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 17369
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:02 pm

Re: Tory Scum

Postby Cannydc » Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:59 pm

jra wrote:
Cannydc wrote:You seem to be unhealthily obsessed with circumcision.

I answered that question previously, I am against it as a fashion statement, or for religious reasons, but there are good reasons in certain parts of the world where it still has relevance in prevention of the spread of HIV through unprotected heterosexual sex. And it is a much more serious op for a 12 year old than a baby, which has to be taken into account.

However, your 'source' was completely biased shite.


So biased article or not, is circumcision without consent in babies and infants for whatever reason an issue?


It is for Bungle, obviously.

And a bunch of compo chasing lawyers in California.

Other than them, who knows ?
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 14866
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:59 pm

Re: Tory Scum

Postby MungoBrush » Sun Feb 10, 2019 8:48 pm

Cannydc wrote:You seem to be unhealthily obsessed with circumcision.

I answered that question previously, I am against it as a fashion statement, or for religious reasons, but there are good reasons in certain parts of the world where it still has relevance in prevention of the spread of HIV through unprotected heterosexual sex. And it is a much more serious op for a 12 year old than a baby, which has to be taken into account.

However, your 'source' was completely biased shite.



NHS says that there's no medical reason for circumcision.
But if some a-holes concocted a health reason for FGM - you'd support it?
What about if someone came up with a health reason to bring back the cane - would you support it?
User avatar
MungoBrush
 
Posts: 1949
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:03 pm

Re: Tory Scum

Postby Cannydc » Sun Feb 10, 2019 9:00 pm

MungoBrush wrote:
Cannydc wrote:You seem to be unhealthily obsessed with circumcision.

I answered that question previously, I am against it as a fashion statement, or for religious reasons, but there are good reasons in certain parts of the world where it still has relevance in prevention of the spread of HIV through unprotected heterosexual sex. And it is a much more serious op for a 12 year old than a baby, which has to be taken into account.

However, your 'source' was completely biased shite.



.NHS says that there's no medical reason for circumcision
But if some a-holes concocted a health reason for FGM - you'd support it?
What about if someone came up with a health reason to bring back the cane - would you support it?


No they don't. I know at least 2 people who had that op, both for entirely justified medical reasons as explained by the NHS.

Why are you bringing FGM into this particular part of the thread ? And CANING ? FFS grow up and stick to the point.
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 14866
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:59 pm

Re: Tory Scum

Postby MungoBrush » Sun Feb 10, 2019 9:23 pm

Cannydc wrote:No they don't. I know at least 2 people who had that op, both for entirely justified medical reasons as explained by the NHS.

Why are you bringing FGM into this particular part of the thread ? And CANING ? FFS grow up and stick to the point.


This is what the NHS says about circumcision:

"It's rare for circumcision to be recommended for medical reasons in boys.
This is because other less invasive and less risky treatments are usually available."

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/circumcision-in-boys/

Mutilation of babies bodies is wrong
It should be made a criminal offence like FGM.
User avatar
MungoBrush
 
Posts: 1949
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:03 pm

Re: Tory Scum

Postby calitom » Sun Feb 10, 2019 11:50 pm

in the usa most men have been circumcised. hasnt negatively affected our health.
whats with the weirdo obsession with circumcision?
like canny says---some lawyers are gonna make bucks off of this.
User avatar
calitom
 
Posts: 4081
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:21 am

Re: Tory Scum

Postby Cannydc » Mon Feb 11, 2019 12:35 am

MungoBrush wrote:
Cannydc wrote:No they don't. I know at least 2 people who had that op, both for entirely justified medical reasons as explained by the NHS.

Why are you bringing FGM into this particular part of the thread ? And CANING ? FFS grow up and stick to the point.


This is what the NHS says about circumcision:

"It's rare for circumcision to be recommended for medical reasons in boys.
This is because other less invasive and less risky treatments are usually available."

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/circumcision-in-boys/

Mutilation of babies bodies is wrong
It should be made a criminal offence like FGM.


NHS says that there's no medical reason for circumcision

(NHS says) It's rare for circumcision to be recommended for medical reasons in boys


See what you did there ?

And Tom and I agree on this - you have a serious issue here.
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 14866
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:59 pm

Re: Tory Scum

Postby MungoBrush » Mon Feb 11, 2019 12:46 pm

Cannydc wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Cannydc wrote:No they don't. I know at least 2 people who had that op, both for entirely justified medical reasons as explained by the NHS.

Why are you bringing FGM into this particular part of the thread ? And CANING ? FFS grow up and stick to the point.


This is what the NHS says about circumcision:

"It's rare for circumcision to be recommended for medical reasons in boys.
This is because other less invasive and less risky treatments are usually available."

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/circumcision-in-boys/

Mutilation of babies bodies is wrong
It should be made a criminal offence like FGM.


NHS says that there's no medical reason for circumcision

(NHS says) It's rare for circumcision to be recommended for medical reasons in boys


See what you did there ?

And Tom and I agree on this - you have a serious issue here.


The issue that I have is with the unnecessary mutilation of babies bodies without their consent.
If adults choose to be mutilated either by tattoos, of FGM, or breast augmentation or circumcision then that's their choice
But don't inflict barbaric customs on defenceless babies.
User avatar
MungoBrush
 
Posts: 1949
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:03 pm

Re: Tory Scum

Postby Rolluplostinspace » Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:54 pm

Maria Gatland

Maria Gatland (born 1948, Dublin, Ireland), is a councillor in the London Borough of Croydon for the Conservative Party, representing the Croham ward. She is also a former Croydon Council cabinet member for education, a post she resigned from after being exposed as a former member of the Irish Republican Army (IRA)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Gatland
Attachments
IRA Tory.jpg
User avatar
Rolluplostinspace
 
Posts: 9041
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 8:12 pm
Location: North Wales

Re: Tory Scum

Postby Stooo » Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:06 pm

calitom wrote:in the usa most men have been circumcised. hasnt negatively affected our health.
whats with the weirdo obsession with circumcision?
like canny says---some lawyers are gonna make bucks off of this.


Kellogg (the cornflake dude) introduced it to stop you wanking! :pmsl:
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 92052
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:24 pm
Location: Bollocks To Brexit

PreviousNext

Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests