Russian aggression

[Fletch]

[calitom]

Russia now the bad guy since Hillary needed to blame her loss on something. Funny it didn't faze her from taking 100s of millions from them for her foundation. And thankfully the dems didn't sell off a chunk of our uranium...oh wait...But that was before they became the bad guys;)

How many times does Uranium One have to be debunked for you?

Can you show proof the Clintons owned and operated a time machine because without one and given the fundamental law that is causality Uranium One falls at the very first hurdle.

go back to the insane asylum.

[Guest]

Russia now the bad guy since Hillary needed to blame her loss on something. Funny it didn't faze her from taking 100s of millions from them for her foundation. And thankfully the dems didn't sell off a chunk of our uranium...oh wait...But that was before they became the bad guys;)

How many times does Uranium One have to be debunked for you?

Can you show proof the Clintons owned and operated a time machine because without one and given the fundamental law that is causality Uranium One falls at the very first hurdle.

go back to the insane asylum.

Do you mean the one you live in where time travel is possible?

Uranium One only works as a scandal if the Clintons can violate the laws causality and that's only possible with time travel so you have to prove to me the Clintons can time travel.

Then you have to come up with a convincing argument about why the didn't just buy a bunch of state lottery tickets and make their millions that way.

[Guest]

Russia now the bad guy since Hillary needed to blame her loss on something. Funny it didn't faze her from taking 100s of millions from them for her foundation. And thankfully the dems didn't sell off a chunk of our uranium...oh wait...But that was before they became the bad guys;)

How many times does Uranium One have to be debunked for you?

Can you show proof the Clintons owned and operated a time machine because without one and given the fundamental law that is causality Uranium One falls at the very first hurdle.

I asked you last time you mentioned this but no answer. What has a time machine got to do with anything?

Who was Secretary of State when the signing off of the sale of Uranium One was required?

Who is Frank Giustra?

Who gave $145 million to the Clinton Foundation and at what time?

Why did the Secretary of State have to sign off agreement to sell Uranium One?

The donation came after the company had been sold and before the permission from a variety of government departments in a committee that the secretary of state did not attend nor even ask for a report from her appointee was given.

The only way for Uranium One to work as a scandal would be if Hilary Clinton was able to be in two places at once and possess a time machine. However if she did possess a time machine being in two places at once wouldn't be a problem so we're just left with the need for a time machine.

Prove she had one please.

[Cactus Jack]

Who is Frank Giustra?

Who gave $145 million to the Clinton Foundation and at what time?

Why did the Secretary of State have to sign off agreement to sell Uranium One?

1 - Frank Giustra is a man who gave $141 million to the Clinton Foundation 3 years after he had sold his stake in Uranium One, he had no financial interest in Uranium One at the time the deal was agreed.

2 - No-one. Frank Giustra gave $141 million to the Clinton Foundation 3 years after he had sold his stake in Uranium One - he had no financial interest in the deal when it was approved. The other four million came from various charities based in Canada who had Uranium One as a part of diversified investment portfolio - it would be like saying Tesco's donation to the Conservative Party comes from an ordinary worker whose pensions fund invest in Tesco.

3 - The Secretary of State did not have to sign off and did not do so. The State Department and nine other departments had to briefed and were expected to raise any concerns through the US Nuclear Regulator and Utah's State Regulator. The State Department had no power to approve or prevent the sale.

To go further Hilary Clinton did not attend CFIUS when the matter was discussed but placed the matter in the hands of a State Department official who was given full delegated authority. No report of the meeting was ever given to Hilary Clinton, nor did she ask for one.

To go further still no Uranium whatsoever left the United States for Russia as a result of this deal, Russia does not need uranium from the United States, Russia EXPORTS uranium. In fact the US imports most of its Uranium and around 18% of it comes FROM Russia to the United States.



Uranium One has been completely debunked many times.

[Fletch]

Answered you in the Clinton Ca$H... thread CJ.

[Fletch]

WHY RUSSIA WON’T INVADE THE UKRAINE, THE BALTIC STATELETS OR ANYBODY ELSE

The AngloZionist propaganda machine is constantly warning us that Russia is about to invade some country. The list of candidates for invasion is long and ranges from Norway to the Ukraine and includes the Baltic statelets, Poland and even countries further West. Of course, we are also told that NATO and the US are here to prevent that. Well, thank God for them, right?

But what is conspicuously missing from this narrative is a discussion of the possible Russian motives for such a military move. Typically, we are merely told that Russia has broken the European post-Cold War order and borders by “annexing” Crimea and by sending military forces into the Donbass. Anybody with an IQ at room temperature or above by now realizes that both of these claims are total bunk. The ones who indeed broke the post-Cold War international order and borders were the NATO member states when they used military force, in complete illegality, to break-up Yugoslavia. As for the people of Crimea, they had the opportunity to vote about their future in a referendum, very much unlike the inhabitants of Kosovo which had no such opportunity. As for the 08.08.08 war, even the Europeans who eventually, and very reluctantly, agreed that it was, in fact, Saakashvili who started this conflict, not Russia.

But let’s set all this aside and assume that the Russian leaders would not hesitate to use military force again if it was to their advantage. Let’s assume that, yes, the Russians are up to no good and that they might well try to bite-off some other piece of land somewhere in Europe.

Such an assumption would immediately raise a crucial question: why would the Russians want to do that?

For some reason, this question is rarely, if ever, asked.

Continues https://southfront.org/the-saker-why-ru ... body-else/

[Guest]

Answered you in the Clinton Ca$H... thread CJ.

Did you explain to him where the Clintons got their time machine from?

[Cactus Jack]

Answered you in the Clinton Ca$H... thread CJ.

I can assure you that you didn't.

You may think you did but you're wrong

[Fletch]

Answered you in the Clinton Ca$H... thread CJ.

I can assure you that you didn't.

You may think you did but you're wrong

You wouldn't know, you said yourself you only read 2 lines of it.

[Cactus Jack]

The two lines were enough - the same tired debunked tirade.

Hilary Clinton is the single most boring individual in the universe and I almost wish half the scandals were true as it would make her slightly more interesting. They aren't and it doesn't

[Fletch]

Answered you in the Clinton Ca$H... thread CJ.

Did you explain to him where the Clintons got their time machine from?

Third time of asking, what is the meaning/relevance of a time machine?

[Cactus Jack]

Answered you in the Clinton Ca$H... thread CJ.

Did you explain to him where the Clintons got their time machine from?

Third time of asking, what is the meaning/relevance of a time machine?

My bad - clicked on the wrong thread to respond to Fletch.

[LordRaven]

Now that I am watching Channel 5's "Warship: Life at sea" I have revisited the Black Sea incident.

HMS Duncan was on a training exercise in international waters with a task force of Turkish Romanian etc fellow NATO ships when buzzed by a load of Russian warplanes.

I suspect it is because HMS Duncan is the most advanced, most capable air defence Destroyer in the world...



Always nice to see opposing forces testing each other, that is until one of the fuckers fires the odd angry shot

Anyway Felch, here's a chance to put The Russin Point of view over in your usual unbiased pro-Russian style.