Fletch wrote:Is she a little bit left wing?
That's a real no no in the US if she is.
Lady Murasaki wrote:Different to the UK then. Taxes are a big vote winner here.
Maddog wrote:Fletch wrote:Is she a little bit left wing?
That's a real no no in the US if she is.
She's a socialist.
But that's not the point of the article.
There was a time when ignorant statements doomed politicians. Now it almost makes them more endearing to many of their followers
Maddog wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Different to the UK then. Taxes are a big vote winner here.
Well, she won.
Maddog wrote:Love her or hate her, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gets it. What is “it”, you might ask? I’ll get there in a second.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez shot to national fame after she won her Democratic primary against incumbent congressman (and Democratic Caucus Chair) Joe Crowley in June of 2018. Ocasio-Cortez, a self-described “democratic socialist”, was a fervent supporter of Bernie Sanders during the 2016 Democratic primary and ran her campaign much in the same fashion as the aforementioned grandpa of democratic socialists.
Ocasio-Cortez spent only $194,000 versus her opponent’s war chest of $3.4 million, yet defeated the 10-term incumbent by nearly 15% in the vote (57.13% to 42.5%). Many within the Democratic Party establishment were at a loss for words at Ocasio-Cortez’s humbling victory over the safe, moderate party leader in Crowley. They couldn’t comprehend that through grassroots alone, Ocasio-Cortez was able to build a coalition of supporters from many different groups, ranging from Black Lives Matter, MoveOn, Democracy for America, and more to defeat an established elected official like Crowley.
Foolishly, many within the greater Republican/conservative/libertarian camps are falling into the same trap that those establishment Democrats did back in June. Ocasio-Cortez has been a “gaffe machine” during her media sprints, as she ignorantly claimed that there were “three chambers of government; the presidency, the Senate, and the House” (the three branches of government are the executive, legislative, and judicial branches) and insisted that once she was “inaugurated” in January, that Congress was going to sign a bunch of progressive laws (members of Congress are sworn in, not inaugurated, and Congress writes the laws, but does not sign them into law).
While it’s tempting (and honestly, easy) to make fun of Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, I plead with you; don’t. Your picking on her is a part of her plan.
Ocasio-Cortez was able to win he primary (and ultimately, win her seat) because she was able to appeal to the average, progressive voter within her district who was your normal, everyday, and generally politically apathetic voter. Those involved in politics on a daily basis, be it professionally or as a hobby, aren’t “normal” when compared to their neighbors. The average person doesn’t think about tax policy, Supreme Court rulings, or the national debt. What they do think about is their health, their families health, their income, their home, and their immediate community.
See, that’s what Ocasio-Cortez figured out. As I hinted at earlier, she gets “it”. The “it” is appealing to the those basic needs of those people who will be casting their votes. The average voter doesn’t want to hear about some brilliant tax policy… no, what they want to hear is that their kids are going to be taken care of if they get hurt in a car accident. And when their politician makes a mistake, like wrongfully stating that the three chambers of government are the presidency, Senate, and the House, the voters don’t care. Why? Because they can easily see themselves making the same mistake. They see themselves in Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/stop ... rsS9HiDDyk
There seems to be a increase in this type of thinking. I wonder if it's social media which allows people like her and Trump to circumvent the filters of the media and speak directly to "their" people.
There was a time when ignorant statements doomed politicians. Now it almost makes them more endearing to many of their followers.
Stooo wrote:Burn baby, burn...
Fletch wrote:Maddog wrote:Fletch wrote:Is she a little bit left wing?
That's a real no no in the US if she is.
She's a socialist.
But that's not the point of the article.
But the knives are out already?There was a time when ignorant statements doomed politicians. Now it almost makes them more endearing to many of their followers
Stooo wrote:Burn baby, burn...
Fletch wrote:Is she a little bit left wing?
That's a real no no in the US if she is.
Maddog wrote:Fletch wrote:Maddog wrote:Fletch wrote:Is she a little bit left wing?
That's a real no no in the US if she is.
She's a socialist.
But that's not the point of the article.
But the knives are out already?There was a time when ignorant statements doomed politicians. Now it almost makes them more endearing to many of their followers
I was comparing her to Trump. Supporters of both are not concerned with accuracy or knowledge.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests