Rolluplostinspace wrote:Maddog wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Are you for or against Trumps position on this rolly?
I think his statement is bullshit and part of an agenda.
From the link >> By the official count, there are 503 U.S. troops stationed in the Islamic State’s former capital. Unofficially, according to The Washington Post and other press reports, the figure is closer to 4,000—twice the number that is supposed to represent a “full withdrawal” from Syrian soil.
It would also be nice to think the president and commander-in-chief has the final say in his administration’s policies overseas, given the constitution by which we are supposed to be governed. But the misleading announcement on the withdrawal of troops, followed by Trump’s boastful tweet, suggest something close to exactly the opposite.
The constitution limits the war powers of the president. Not that any of them care anymore.
So does the money power and Israel.
calitom wrote:My posts dont seem to be going thru....
So Nixon can get us out of vietnam, bush can destroy iraq, obama can destroy libya,syria and nearly egypt...but Trump cant remove troops from syria??
makes sense Jack;)
Maddog wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:Maddog wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Are you for or against Trumps position on this rolly?
I think his statement is bullshit and part of an agenda.
From the link >> By the official count, there are 503 U.S. troops stationed in the Islamic State’s former capital. Unofficially, according to The Washington Post and other press reports, the figure is closer to 4,000—twice the number that is supposed to represent a “full withdrawal” from Syrian soil.
It would also be nice to think the president and commander-in-chief has the final say in his administration’s policies overseas, given the constitution by which we are supposed to be governed. But the misleading announcement on the withdrawal of troops, followed by Trump’s boastful tweet, suggest something close to exactly the opposite.
The constitution limits the war powers of the president. Not that any of them care anymore.
So does the money power and Israel.
As usual, your bias makes you miss the point. Congress is supposed to approve military action (after a certain amount of time). They have chosen to give up that power.
Maddog wrote:Well, this was a dumb idea for a thread. We get to read the same bullshit we have all read 100 times.
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Are you for or against Trumps position on this rolly?
I think his statement is bullshit and part of an agenda.
From the link >> By the official count, there are 503 U.S. troops stationed in the Islamic State’s former capital. Unofficially, according to The Washington Post and other press reports, the figure is closer to 4,000—twice the number that is supposed to represent a “full withdrawal” from Syrian soil.
It would also be nice to think the president and commander-in-chief has the final say in his administration’s policies overseas, given the constitution by which we are supposed to be governed. But the misleading announcement on the withdrawal of troops, followed by Trump’s boastful tweet, suggest something close to exactly the opposite.
Lady Murasaki wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Are you for or against Trumps position on this rolly?
I think his statement is bullshit and part of an agenda.
From the link >> By the official count, there are 503 U.S. troops stationed in the Islamic State’s former capital. Unofficially, according to The Washington Post and other press reports, the figure is closer to 4,000—twice the number that is supposed to represent a “full withdrawal” from Syrian soil.
It would also be nice to think the president and commander-in-chief has the final say in his administration’s policies overseas, given the constitution by which we are supposed to be governed. But the misleading announcement on the withdrawal of troops, followed by Trump’s boastful tweet, suggest something close to exactly the opposite.
What’s his agenda? To show that he has no power over the ‘deep state’?
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Are you for or against Trumps position on this rolly?
I think his statement is bullshit and part of an agenda.
From the link >> By the official count, there are 503 U.S. troops stationed in the Islamic State’s former capital. Unofficially, according to The Washington Post and other press reports, the figure is closer to 4,000—twice the number that is supposed to represent a “full withdrawal” from Syrian soil.
It would also be nice to think the president and commander-in-chief has the final say in his administration’s policies overseas, given the constitution by which we are supposed to be governed. But the misleading announcement on the withdrawal of troops, followed by Trump’s boastful tweet, suggest something close to exactly the opposite.
What’s his agenda? To show that he has no power over the ‘deep state’?
Back for a few minutes .....
I have no idea what the agenda is or can even be sure there is one.
One thing's for sure Trump will do as he's told.
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Are you for or against Trumps position on this rolly?
I think his statement is bullshit and part of an agenda.
From the link >> By the official count, there are 503 U.S. troops stationed in the Islamic State’s former capital. Unofficially, according to The Washington Post and other press reports, the figure is closer to 4,000—twice the number that is supposed to represent a “full withdrawal” from Syrian soil.
It would also be nice to think the president and commander-in-chief has the final say in his administration’s policies overseas, given the constitution by which we are supposed to be governed. But the misleading announcement on the withdrawal of troops, followed by Trump’s boastful tweet, suggest something close to exactly the opposite.
What’s his agenda? To show that he has no power over the ‘deep state’?
Back for a few minutes .....
I have no idea what the agenda is or can even be sure there is one.
One thing's for sure Trump will do as he's told.
calitom wrote:My posts dont seem to be going thru....
So Nixon can get us out of vietnam, bush can destroy iraq, obama can destroy libya,syria and nearly egypt...but Trump cant remove troops from syria??
makes sense Jack;)
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests