Cannydc wrote:The differences may be too subtle for you, Fletch, but the BBC isn't funded by the government, it is funded by license holders. Neither is it controlled by the government, as opposed to Sputnik etc, which almost certainly are controlled directly by the Kremlin, with their representatives in daily, overseeing attendance.
Rolluplostinspace wrote:LordRaven wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:LordRaven wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:This isn't a conspiracy?
You people live in a big echo chamber of controlled information .....
Hold on! Aren't you one of the two plonkers who consistently posts links to proven Russian funded anti-western fake news sites?
So I am guessing, now that all your preferred "in the know/finger on the pulse as to what is really going on in the world" websites having been exposed as complete and utter Fake News, this is some kind of attempt to re-establish some modicum of credibility for yourself?
Good for you.
None of the sites or reporters I use have been exposed as any such thing Raven.
You saying the famous John Pilger works for Russia just makes you look a bigger twat than usual.
The MSM and the intelligence services are the people who constantly decry and fear alternative media but you really wouldn't understand that so go back to sleep.
As usual nothing to say about the content of the post.
I think you might have to go on ignore.
What about Southfront, informationclearinghouse, globalresearch etc etc etc???
Are you saying, in spite of all the evidence to the contrary posted on here showing them to be Fake News sites, that they are legitimate news sources?
In the real world your MSM has proved to be lying mouthpieces for the powers that be again and again when it comes to war reporting and international politics while the ones you call fake news keep proving to be right on these matters.
Fletch wrote:Cannydc wrote:Fletch wrote:True Jack, just as the alternative media have been right on many things over the years. Reporting things inconvenient or embarrassing for the powers that be has now become CT or fake news according to the msm followers. By doing so, they divert attention from the subject and then hope it goes away.
raven and canny are making this forum unusable with their continual trolling about CT's and fake news and Russia, Russia, Russia cries. Meanwhile the criminal Anglo-American empire continue to act lawlessly with impunity. raven and canny types are the problem, not the fact finders they think they are.
Raven and Canny aren't the ones flooding the forum with endless anti-Western propaganda from discredited sites, Fletch. That would be you and Jack.
And quoting George Galloway just adds to the dross.
Not discredited sites at all. Sites the msm and establishment don't like for the reasons outlined.
Anti western propaganda = the truth about what the west do and who they use for regime changes. Why do you condone that behaviour?
You condone the use of terrorists, the re-homing of them in the UK, the illegal attacks on sovereign nations and the torture and war crimes that go along with the regime changes in many countries.
Why support such immoral and illegal behaviour? Why buy in to the UK government funded BBC but not the Russian funded Sputnik?
If state paid news stations are bad, they both are or both good. Why the hypocrisy?
Cannydc wrote:The differences may be too subtle for you, Fletch, but the BBC isn't funded by the government, it is funded by license holders. Neither is it controlled by the government, as opposed to Sputnik etc, which almost certainly are controlled directly by the Kremlin, with their representatives in daily, overseeing attendance.
Fletch wrote:CONFIRMED: Chemical Weapons Assessment Contradicting Official Syria Narrative Is Authentic
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51627.htm
Further Evidence US Attacked Syria Based on False Flag
Further evidence has emerged indicating that the alleged 2018 Douma, Syria chemical attack was staged by US-backed militants, not the Syrian government.
With the US plotting war from South America to the South China Sea, understanding how US-backed militants staged the attack, allowing the Western media to sell US military intervention to the global public based on a lie – will help guard against similarly staged attacks in the near future.
Recent revelations mean the US not only falsely accused Damascus of having carried out the attack – but launched military strikes against Syria based on an entirely false pretext. To date, the US has categorically failed to produce any convincing evidence backing their original claims.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51632.htm
The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), the international body which examines alleged incidents of the use of poison gas, has just confirmed to me that a devastating leaked document from its Dutch HQ is genuine.
The document, written by one of the OPCW’s most experienced investigators, shows that it is highly unlikely that gas canisters found at the scene of an alleged poison gas attack in Douma, Syria were actually dropped from helicopters – as has been widely believed and claimed. The claim is crucial to the case for bombing Syria. A copy of the leaked document can be found on the Peter Hitchens blog. See https://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk ... ague-.html
https://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk ... rophe.html
The OPCW Chemical Watchdog: A US Imperial Tool. The CW Douma Incident in Syria
https://www.globalresearch.ca/opcw-us-i ... ol/5677838
Just as I posted at the time to the usual cries of CT. Fake news, dodgy sites.
Turns out the alternative media was right all along, just as I posted.
Seen it in the msm, apart from Peter Hitchens? No, of course not.
Fletch wrote:Fletch wrote:CONFIRMED: Chemical Weapons Assessment Contradicting Official Syria Narrative Is Authentic
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51627.htm PROVEN FAKE NEWS SITE
Further Evidence US Attacked Syria Based on False Flag
Further evidence has emerged indicating that the alleged 2018 Douma, Syria chemical attack was staged by US-backed militants, not the Syrian government.
With the US plotting war from South America to the South China Sea, understanding how US-backed militants staged the attack, allowing the Western media to sell US military intervention to the global public based on a lie – will help guard against similarly staged attacks in the near future.
Recent revelations mean the US not only falsely accused Damascus of having carried out the attack – but launched military strikes against Syria based on an entirely false pretext. To date, the US has categorically failed to produce any convincing evidence backing their original claims.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51632.htmA PROVEN FAKE NEWS SITE
The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), the international body which examines alleged incidents of the use of poison gas, has just confirmed to me that a devastating leaked document from its Dutch HQ is genuine.
The document, written by one of the OPCW’s most experienced investigators, shows that it is highly unlikely that gas canisters found at the scene of an alleged poison gas attack in Douma, Syria were actually dropped from helicopters – as has been widely believed and claimed. The claim is crucial to the case for bombing Syria. A copy of the leaked document can be found on the Peter Hitchens blog. See https://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk ... ague-.html
https://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk ... rophe.html
The OPCW Chemical Watchdog: A US Imperial Tool. The CW Douma Incident in Syria
https://www.globalresearch.ca/opcw-us-i ... ol/5677838 PROVEN FAKE NEWS SITE
Just as I posted at the time to the usual cries of CT. Fake news, dodgy sites.
Turns out the alternative media was right all along, just as I posted.
Seen it in the msm, apart from Peter Hitchens? No, of course not.
Fletch wrote:You absolute wanker raven. I posted this before but you ignored it:
EU vs Disinformation campaign
This website is part of a campaign to better forecast, address and respond to pro-Kremlin disinformation. The ‘EU versus Disinformation’ campaign is run by the European External Action Service East Stratcom Task Force. The team was set up after the EU Heads of State and Government stressed the need to challenge Russia’s ongoing disinformation campaigns in March 2015. Read more about the team here.
Which leads to:
Questions and Answers about the East StratCom Task Force
Why was the East StratCom Task Force created?
The Task Force was set up to address Russia's ongoing disinformation campaigns. In March 2015, the European Council tasked the High Representative in cooperation with EU institutions and Member States to submit an action plan on strategic communication.
https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/hea ... k-force_en
StratCom | NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence ...
https://www.stratcomcoe.org
Get the fuck out of here with you Anglo-American propaganda from the propagators of war.
Rolluplostinspace wrote:I think Lardy must have broken the record for how many times a person can type Russia.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests