Aggravated theft

Re: Aggravated theft

Postby jra » Tue Feb 12, 2019 4:34 pm

Other than Human Rights Watch (featured in article) where is the condemnation from the west? Any other nation and all hell breaks loose. Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, Russia, China, but Israel and suddenly barbaric behaviour and breaking international law is fine.


Simply because Israel is in terms of the west 'friends/allies' and the other countries are our (the west's) perceived (historic) enemies.

Russia. The cold war. Nearly caused WW3 with the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria. Terrorist attacks against the west, amongst other things
Libya. Lockerbie bombing, supplying Semtex to the IRA, amongst other things.
China. Simply because it's a ruthless dictatorship and has an extremely poor human rights record.

Another reason may be Israeli (Jewish) influence in the west, i.e. very prominent in politics, finance, media and the film industry.

Another reason may be the west wants to keep Israel on their side, not make an enemy of them and it could be crucial when WW3 breaks out (my prediction and most likely to originate from somewhere in the Middle East).
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 15652
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:02 pm

Re: Aggravated theft

Postby Fletch » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:14 pm

MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


A spot of ethnic cleansing is ok in your book then.

Apartheid still popular with the right wing, who'd a guessed...
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 12775
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:35 pm

Re: Aggravated theft

Postby Fletch » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:16 pm

calitom wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


I agree. Plus you have to factor in Israel wanting a buffer zone from attack following the 67 and 72 wars.

I also agree that Israel is a pain in the butt and and an attention hog. But lets face it The Palestinians were thrown out of every other place.
And if palestine controlled what is now israel then israel would turn into an impoverished muslim hellhole within a few months.
Its nice to talk about palestinian rights...But they could never successfully function on their own


WTF? :scratch:

You'll have to explain that one Tom.
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 12775
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:35 pm

Re: Aggravated theft

Postby MungoBrush » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:35 pm

Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


A spot of ethnic cleansing is ok in your book then.

Apartheid still popular with the right wing, who'd a guessed...


You Twat

Nearly 2000 buildings are being demolished to make way for HS2 for example

Is that apartheid?

You should think before you post.
User avatar
MungoBrush
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:03 pm

Re: Aggravated theft

Postby Fletch » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:36 pm

MungoBrush wrote:
Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


A spot of ethnic cleansing is ok in your book then.

Apartheid still popular with the right wing, who'd a guessed...


You Twat

Nearly 2000 buildings are being demolished to make way for HS2 for example

Is that apartheid?

You should think before you post.


Is it to remove one particular demographic? :dunno:
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 12775
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:35 pm

Re: Aggravated theft

Postby MungoBrush » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:47 pm

Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


A spot of ethnic cleansing is ok in your book then.

Apartheid still popular with the right wing, who'd a guessed...


You Twat

Nearly 2000 buildings are being demolished to make way for HS2 for example

Is that apartheid?

You should think before you post.


Is it to remove one particular demographic? :dunno:


Yes.
It's to move all the people living in the way of the new rail track.
User avatar
MungoBrush
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:03 pm

Re: Aggravated theft

Postby Fletch » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:52 pm

MungoBrush wrote:
Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


A spot of ethnic cleansing is ok in your book then.

Apartheid still popular with the right wing, who'd a guessed...


You Twat

Nearly 2000 buildings are being demolished to make way for HS2 for example

Is that apartheid?

You should think before you post.


Is it to remove one particular demographic? :dunno:


Yes.
It's to move all the people living in the way of the new rail track.


So all different kinds of people then, not one particular demographic such as

features the seizure of an estimated 260,00 dunams(64,247 acres) from Palestine’s Bedouins
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 12775
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:35 pm

Re: Aggravated theft

Postby jra » Fri Feb 15, 2019 3:20 am

MungoBrush wrote:
Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


A spot of ethnic cleansing is ok in your book then.

Apartheid still popular with the right wing, who'd a guessed...


You Twat

Nearly 2000 buildings are being demolished to make way for HS2 for example

Is that apartheid?

You should think before you post.


Is it to remove one particular demographic? :dunno:


Yes.
It's to move all the people living in the way of the new rail track.


What's that got to do with demographics?
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 15652
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:02 pm

Re: Aggravated theft

Postby MungoBrush » Fri Feb 15, 2019 11:59 am

Fletch wrote:So all different kinds of people then, not one particular demographic such as

features the seizure of an estimated 260,00 dunams(64,247 acres) from Palestine’s Bedouins


You have no clue what are the ethnicities of those people involved for the HS2
They might all be gypsies
Presumably - if they were - you'd be screaming outrage.
User avatar
MungoBrush
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:03 pm

Previous

Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests