Rolluplostinspace wrote:Don't worry Raven all these streets will be dust soon and the people dead for your cause .......
LordRaven wrote:Walls have ears and Loose Lips Sink Ships would have been lost on Felch and Rollup
Maddog wrote:If I has a dollar for every thread started by Jack, about Iran.............................................
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Maddog wrote:If I has a dollar for every thread started by Jack, about Iran.............................................
More out and out bullshit hoping no one will notice.
Do a search you won't won't have enough for a pack of fags.
LordRaven wrote:Fletch wrote:Why are you posting western backed msm propaganda again raven?
Meanwhile:
Bolton’s Vague Press Release Lays Foundation for Military Attack Against Iran
An attack launched by a “proxy” of Iran on not just assets but “interests” of the U.S. in the region or “interests” of a U.S. ally in the region, would now be sufficient to trigger a U.S. attack on Iran.
In a late Sunday press release, National Security Advisor John Bolton announced the deployment of the Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group (ABECSG) and a bomber task force to U.S. Central Command as a “clear and unmistakable message to Iran.” The press release claims that the move was made “in response to a number of troubling and escalatory indications and warnings,” which were left unspecified.
The statement further claims that “any attack on United States interests or on those of our allies will be met with unrelenting force” and that, while “the United States is not seeking war with the Iranian regime,” the Trump administration is “fully prepared to respond to any attack, whether by proxy, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or regular Iranian forces.”
Last month, in a move that many viewed as a set-up for a war with Iran — which has long been sought by Bolton as well as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, even prior to their posts in the current administration
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51560.htm
It is in response to all your anti-western CT Bullshit posts from the most unreliable of sources that you opt to believe because you think it makes you look clever, when in fact all it proves is that you have an agenda and are blinkered in your views to the point of stupidity.
You back dictators bombing shooting and gassing their own people, you back terrorist islamic fundamentalists over the west, you hate the west ---need I go on? I think not.
If you hate us so much why not piss off and go and live in a muslim sharia law run country and report back to us, if you are still in possession of that turnip substituting for your head?
LordRaven wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:Maddog wrote:If I has a dollar for every thread started by Jack, about Iran.............................................
More out and out bullshit hoping no one will notice.
Do a search you won't won't have enough for a pack of fags.
You are aware, well even you must be, of the fact that the worldwide caliphate shite started in Iran with the Ayatollah and that is why it was contained by any and all countries not wanting to live under medieval bearded fuckwitism. It worked well, even Iran's people don't want it, they want freedom and they are arrested and killed for wanting rights you take for granted.
The fact that that ideology and dream of worldwide domination has manifested itself in other countries is a real worry, it has proven difficult to stop and continues to be a world problem.
And yet you are all for it, why is that?
Fletch wrote:US ACCUSES IRAN OF ATTACK ON SAUDI TANKERS
Update: Just as everyone with half a frontal lobe had expected, the WSJ reported late on Monday that according to an initial U.S. assessment, “Iran was likely behind the attack” on the two Saudi Arabian oil tankers and two other vessels damaged over the weekend near the Strait of Hormuz, a U.S. official said, a finding that, whether confirmed or not, will certainly inflame military tensions in the Gulf and likely result in a global proxy war that drags in the US, China and Russia. Oh, and that would be the Persian Gulf for those wondering, not the Gulf of Tonkin, which is where another famous False Flag naval incident occurred.
Furthermore, as we predicted would happen on Sunday, this “official assessment”, was the first suggestion by any nation that Iran was responsible for the attack and follows a series of U.S. warnings against “aggression” by Iran or its allies and proxies against military or commercial vessels in the region. Some more details from the WSJ:
The assessment, predictable from a mile away, squares perfectly with CIA veteran Mike Pompeo’s warning from just two days before the alleged attack, in which he said that “The regime in Tehran should understand that any attacks by them or their proxies of any identity against US interests or citizens will be answered with a swift and decisive US response,” the US Secretary of State wrote in a statement warning that Iran should not mistake US “restraint” for a “lack of resolve,” and criticizing Iran for “an escalating series of threatening actions and statements in recent weeks.”
Two days later Iran – according to US officials – staged the most brazen attack on oil tankers in the Straits of Hormuz in years.
https://southfront.org/us-accuses-iran- ... i-tankers/
There's a CT right there raven. That Iran was responsible.
As the article says though, "Just as everyone with half a frontal lobe had expected" so that rules you out. You actually believe it!
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Fletch wrote:US ACCUSES IRAN OF ATTACK ON SAUDI TANKERS
Update: Just as everyone with half a frontal lobe had expected, the WSJ reported late on Monday that according to an initial U.S. assessment, “Iran was likely behind the attack” on the two Saudi Arabian oil tankers and two other vessels damaged over the weekend near the Strait of Hormuz, a U.S. official said, a finding that, whether confirmed or not, will certainly inflame military tensions in the Gulf and likely result in a global proxy war that drags in the US, China and Russia. Oh, and that would be the Persian Gulf for those wondering, not the Gulf of Tonkin, which is where another famous False Flag naval incident occurred.
Furthermore, as we predicted would happen on Sunday, this “official assessment”, was the first suggestion by any nation that Iran was responsible for the attack and follows a series of U.S. warnings against “aggression” by Iran or its allies and proxies against military or commercial vessels in the region. Some more details from the WSJ:
The assessment, predictable from a mile away, squares perfectly with CIA veteran Mike Pompeo’s warning from just two days before the alleged attack, in which he said that “The regime in Tehran should understand that any attacks by them or their proxies of any identity against US interests or citizens will be answered with a swift and decisive US response,” the US Secretary of State wrote in a statement warning that Iran should not mistake US “restraint” for a “lack of resolve,” and criticizing Iran for “an escalating series of threatening actions and statements in recent weeks.”
Two days later Iran – according to US officials – staged the most brazen attack on oil tankers in the Straits of Hormuz in years.
https://southfront.org/us-accuses-iran- ... i-tankers/
There's a CT right there raven. That Iran was responsible.
As the article says though, "Just as everyone with half a frontal lobe had expected" so that rules you out. You actually believe it!
The really scary bit Fletch is there are many people .... some on here .... who will actually believe this stuff ... believe that Iran wants to push America into a war where Iran gets destroyed.
Every nation America attacks deserves it according to the bullshit and the likes of Raven will be cheering it on from the sidelines.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests