Iran

Re: Iran

Postby Rolluplostinspace » Mon May 13, 2019 3:27 pm

Beirut Lebanon will have to go too soon for the same reasons no doubt .....

https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CH ... rpOhkkEuZI
User avatar
Rolluplostinspace
 
Posts: 18689
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: Iran

Postby Rolluplostinspace » Mon May 13, 2019 3:30 pm

Rolluplostinspace wrote:Don't worry Raven all these streets will be dust soon and the people dead for your cause .......

You do have a cause though and it is supporting whatever the west want to do to make these people bow to the empire ... or die.
User avatar
Rolluplostinspace
 
Posts: 18689
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: Iran

Postby LordRaven » Mon May 13, 2019 3:45 pm

Walls have ears and Loose Lips Sink Ships would have been lost on Felch and Rollup :shake head:
User avatar
LordRaven
Twat.
 
Posts: 51797
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:39 pm
Location: Enceladus

Re: Iran

Postby Rolluplostinspace » Mon May 13, 2019 5:08 pm

LordRaven wrote:Walls have ears and Loose Lips Sink Ships would have been lost on Felch and Rollup :shake head:

Surrounding Iran and constantly threatening them with war is secret?
User avatar
Rolluplostinspace
 
Posts: 18689
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: Iran

Postby Rolluplostinspace » Mon May 13, 2019 5:09 pm

Threatening other countries who ignore the sanctions with reprisals is secret too?
User avatar
Rolluplostinspace
 
Posts: 18689
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: Iran

Postby Maddog » Mon May 13, 2019 8:50 pm

If I has a dollar for every thread started by Jack, about Iran.............................................
User avatar
Maddog
 
Posts: 38385
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:46 am

Re: Iran

Postby Rolluplostinspace » Mon May 13, 2019 8:57 pm

Maddog wrote:If I has a dollar for every thread started by Jack, about Iran.............................................

More out and out bullshit hoping no one will notice.
Do a search you won't won't have enough for a pack of fags.
User avatar
Rolluplostinspace
 
Posts: 18689
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: Iran

Postby LordRaven » Tue May 14, 2019 2:32 pm

Rolluplostinspace wrote:
Maddog wrote:If I has a dollar for every thread started by Jack, about Iran.............................................

More out and out bullshit hoping no one will notice.
Do a search you won't won't have enough for a pack of fags.


You are aware, well even you must be, of the fact that the worldwide caliphate shite started in Iran with the Ayatollah and that is why it was contained by any and all countries not wanting to live under medieval bearded fuckwitism. It worked well, even Iran's people don't want it, they want freedom and they are arrested and killed for wanting rights you take for granted.

The fact that that ideology and dream of worldwide domination has manifested itself in other countries is a real worry, it has proven difficult to stop and continues to be a world problem.

And yet you are all for it, why is that?
User avatar
LordRaven
Twat.
 
Posts: 51797
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:39 pm
Location: Enceladus

Re: Iran

Postby Fletch » Tue May 14, 2019 7:05 pm

LordRaven wrote:
Fletch wrote:Why are you posting western backed msm propaganda again raven?

Meanwhile:

Bolton’s Vague Press Release Lays Foundation for Military Attack Against Iran

An attack launched by a “proxy” of Iran on not just assets but “interests” of the U.S. in the region or “interests” of a U.S. ally in the region, would now be sufficient to trigger a U.S. attack on Iran.

In a late Sunday press release, National Security Advisor John Bolton announced the deployment of the Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group (ABECSG) and a bomber task force to U.S. Central Command as a “clear and unmistakable message to Iran.” The press release claims that the move was made “in response to a number of troubling and escalatory indications and warnings,” which were left unspecified.

The statement further claims that “any attack on United States interests or on those of our allies will be met with unrelenting force” and that, while “the United States is not seeking war with the Iranian regime,” the Trump administration is “fully prepared to respond to any attack, whether by proxy, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or regular Iranian forces.”

Last month, in a move that many viewed as a set-up for a war with Iran — which has long been sought by Bolton as well as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, even prior to their posts in the current administration

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51560.htm

It is in response to all your anti-western CT Bullshit posts from the most unreliable of sources that you opt to believe because you think it makes you look clever, when in fact all it proves is that you have an agenda and are blinkered in your views to the point of stupidity.
You back dictators bombing shooting and gassing their own people, you back terrorist islamic fundamentalists over the west, you hate the west ---need I go on? I think not.
If you hate us so much why not piss off and go and live in a muslim sharia law run country and report back to us, if you are still in possession of that turnip substituting for your head?


Who, when and where raven?
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 16271
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: Iran

Postby Fletch » Tue May 14, 2019 7:12 pm

LordRaven wrote:
Rolluplostinspace wrote:
Maddog wrote:If I has a dollar for every thread started by Jack, about Iran.............................................

More out and out bullshit hoping no one will notice.
Do a search you won't won't have enough for a pack of fags.


You are aware, well even you must be, of the fact that the worldwide caliphate shite started in Iran with the Ayatollah and that is why it was contained by any and all countries not wanting to live under medieval bearded fuckwitism. It worked well, even Iran's people don't want it, they want freedom and they are arrested and killed for wanting rights you take for granted.

The fact that that ideology and dream of worldwide domination has manifested itself in other countries is a real worry, it has proven difficult to stop and continues to be a world problem.

And yet you are all for it, why is that?


:shell:

You really are clueless raven.

America Created Al-Qaeda and the ISIS Terror Group

https://www.globalresearch.ca/america-c ... up/5402881

Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... syria-iraq

Anti-ISIS coalition knowingly sponsored violent extremists to ‘isolate’ Assad, rollback ‘Shia expansion’

A declassified secret US government document obtained by the conservative public interest law firm, Judicial Watch, shows that Western governments deliberately allied with al-Qaeda and other Islamist extremist groups to topple Syrian dictator Bashir al-Assad.

The document reveals that in coordination with the Gulf states and Turkey, the West intentionally sponsored violent Islamist groups to destabilize Assad, and that these “supporting powers” desired the emergence of a “Salafist Principality” in Syria to “isolate the Syrian regime.”

According to the newly declassified US document, the Pentagon foresaw the likely rise of the ‘Islamic State’ as a direct consequence of this strategy, and warned that it could destabilize Iraq. Despite anticipating that Western, Gulf state and Turkish support for the “Syrian opposition” — which included al-Qaeda in Iraq — could lead to the emergence of an ‘Islamic State’ in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), the document provides no indication of any decision to reverse the policy of support to the Syrian rebels. On the contrary, the emergence of an al-Qaeda affiliated “Salafist Principality” as a result is described as a strategic opportunity to isolate Assad.

https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence ... 9ad7a29092
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 16271
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: Iran

Postby Fletch » Tue May 14, 2019 7:16 pm

Who is pushing for war with Iran?

Who benefits from war with Iran?
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 16271
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: Iran

Postby Fletch » Tue May 14, 2019 8:15 pm

US ACCUSES IRAN OF ATTACK ON SAUDI TANKERS

Update: Just as everyone with half a frontal lobe had expected, the WSJ reported late on Monday that according to an initial U.S. assessment, “Iran was likely behind the attack” on the two Saudi Arabian oil tankers and two other vessels damaged over the weekend near the Strait of Hormuz, a U.S. official said, a finding that, whether confirmed or not, will certainly inflame military tensions in the Gulf and likely result in a global proxy war that drags in the US, China and Russia. Oh, and that would be the Persian Gulf for those wondering, not the Gulf of Tonkin, which is where another famous False Flag naval incident occurred.

Furthermore, as we predicted would happen on Sunday, this “official assessment”, was the first suggestion by any nation that Iran was responsible for the attack and follows a series of U.S. warnings against “aggression” by Iran or its allies and proxies against military or commercial vessels in the region. Some more details from the WSJ:

The assessment, predictable from a mile away, squares perfectly with CIA veteran Mike Pompeo’s warning from just two days before the alleged attack, in which he said that “The regime in Tehran should understand that any attacks by them or their proxies of any identity against US interests or citizens will be answered with a swift and decisive US response,” the US Secretary of State wrote in a statement warning that Iran should not mistake US “restraint” for a “lack of resolve,” and criticizing Iran for “an escalating series of threatening actions and statements in recent weeks.”

Two days later Iran – according to US officials – staged the most brazen attack on oil tankers in the Straits of Hormuz in years.

https://southfront.org/us-accuses-iran- ... i-tankers/

There's a CT right there raven. That Iran was responsible.

As the article says though, "Just as everyone with half a frontal lobe had expected" so that rules you out. You actually believe it! :pointlaugh:
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 16271
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: Iran

Postby Rolluplostinspace » Tue May 14, 2019 8:38 pm

Fletch wrote:US ACCUSES IRAN OF ATTACK ON SAUDI TANKERS

Update: Just as everyone with half a frontal lobe had expected, the WSJ reported late on Monday that according to an initial U.S. assessment, “Iran was likely behind the attack” on the two Saudi Arabian oil tankers and two other vessels damaged over the weekend near the Strait of Hormuz, a U.S. official said, a finding that, whether confirmed or not, will certainly inflame military tensions in the Gulf and likely result in a global proxy war that drags in the US, China and Russia. Oh, and that would be the Persian Gulf for those wondering, not the Gulf of Tonkin, which is where another famous False Flag naval incident occurred.

Furthermore, as we predicted would happen on Sunday, this “official assessment”, was the first suggestion by any nation that Iran was responsible for the attack and follows a series of U.S. warnings against “aggression” by Iran or its allies and proxies against military or commercial vessels in the region. Some more details from the WSJ:

The assessment, predictable from a mile away, squares perfectly with CIA veteran Mike Pompeo’s warning from just two days before the alleged attack, in which he said that “The regime in Tehran should understand that any attacks by them or their proxies of any identity against US interests or citizens will be answered with a swift and decisive US response,” the US Secretary of State wrote in a statement warning that Iran should not mistake US “restraint” for a “lack of resolve,” and criticizing Iran for “an escalating series of threatening actions and statements in recent weeks.”

Two days later Iran – according to US officials – staged the most brazen attack on oil tankers in the Straits of Hormuz in years.

https://southfront.org/us-accuses-iran- ... i-tankers/

There's a CT right there raven. That Iran was responsible.

As the article says though, "Just as everyone with half a frontal lobe had expected" so that rules you out. You actually believe it! :pointlaugh:

The really scary bit Fletch is there are many people .... some on here .... who will actually believe this stuff ... believe that Iran wants to push America into a war where Iran gets destroyed.
Every nation America attacks deserves it according to the bullshit and the likes of Raven will be cheering it on from the sidelines.
User avatar
Rolluplostinspace
 
Posts: 18689
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: Iran

Postby Fletch » Tue May 14, 2019 9:14 pm

Rolluplostinspace wrote:
Fletch wrote:US ACCUSES IRAN OF ATTACK ON SAUDI TANKERS

Update: Just as everyone with half a frontal lobe had expected, the WSJ reported late on Monday that according to an initial U.S. assessment, “Iran was likely behind the attack” on the two Saudi Arabian oil tankers and two other vessels damaged over the weekend near the Strait of Hormuz, a U.S. official said, a finding that, whether confirmed or not, will certainly inflame military tensions in the Gulf and likely result in a global proxy war that drags in the US, China and Russia. Oh, and that would be the Persian Gulf for those wondering, not the Gulf of Tonkin, which is where another famous False Flag naval incident occurred.

Furthermore, as we predicted would happen on Sunday, this “official assessment”, was the first suggestion by any nation that Iran was responsible for the attack and follows a series of U.S. warnings against “aggression” by Iran or its allies and proxies against military or commercial vessels in the region. Some more details from the WSJ:

The assessment, predictable from a mile away, squares perfectly with CIA veteran Mike Pompeo’s warning from just two days before the alleged attack, in which he said that “The regime in Tehran should understand that any attacks by them or their proxies of any identity against US interests or citizens will be answered with a swift and decisive US response,” the US Secretary of State wrote in a statement warning that Iran should not mistake US “restraint” for a “lack of resolve,” and criticizing Iran for “an escalating series of threatening actions and statements in recent weeks.”

Two days later Iran – according to US officials – staged the most brazen attack on oil tankers in the Straits of Hormuz in years.

https://southfront.org/us-accuses-iran- ... i-tankers/

There's a CT right there raven. That Iran was responsible.

As the article says though, "Just as everyone with half a frontal lobe had expected" so that rules you out. You actually believe it! :pointlaugh:

The really scary bit Fletch is there are many people .... some on here .... who will actually believe this stuff ... believe that Iran wants to push America into a war where Iran gets destroyed.
Every nation America attacks deserves it according to the bullshit and the likes of Raven will be cheering it on from the sidelines.


I know Jack, frightening really in this age of information at ones fingertips. The problem with the likes of raven and others shouting CT all the time is they don't explain what the conspiracy theory is. It's just become an automatic response to shut down any news or information that is inconvenient or embarrassing.

Why the fuck they are so keen to defend the establishment and the crooks within it remains a mystery. :dunno:

It's got to the point in this country where a benefit claimant caught fiddling creates more public outrage than the government re-homing Al Nusra terrorists (white helmets) from Syria. The very same people then go on about foreign terrorists and immigration! :thud:
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 16271
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: Iran

Postby Fletch » Tue May 14, 2019 9:31 pm

US Special Forces Command Issues New Guide for Overthrowing Foreign Governments

No kidding – this is not our headline, but Newsweek’s: “US Special Forces School Publishes New Guide For Overthrowing Foreign Governments” – and as far as we can tell they are the only major mainstream outlet to have picked up on the fact that the US military is now essentially openly bragging on past and future capabilities to foster covert regime change operations.

The 250-page study entitled “Support to Resistance: Strategic Purpose and Effectiveness” was put out by the Joint Special Operations University under US Special Operations Command, which is the Army’s official unified command center which overseas all joint covert and clandestine missions out of MacDill AFB, Florida.

“This work will serve as a benchmark reference on resistance movements for the benefit of the special operations community and its civilian leadership,” the report introduces.

The study examines 47 instances of US special forces trying to intervene in various countries from 1941-2003, thus special attention is given to the Cold War, but it doesn’t include coups which lacked “legitimate resistance movements” — such as the case of ‘Operation AJAX’ in 1953 which overthrew Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-specia ... ts/5677282
User avatar
Fletch
 
Posts: 16271
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 pm

PreviousNext

Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests