Yaxley-Lennon slapped down by High Court judge

[Stooo]

Let's hope Mr Yaxley-Lennon has some BTE or ATE insurance cover or he's going to be insolvent and lose his house (a bit like Katie Hopkins...)

He's been moving his assets for months, dissolving or changing companies to try to hide the filthy lucre. I believe that the judge has asked for a forensic examination of his finances.

[Avon Barksdale]

Let's hope Mr Yaxley-Lennon has some BTE or ATE insurance cover or he's going to be insolvent and lose his house (a bit like Katie Hopkins...)

He's been moving his assets for months, dissolving or changing companies to try to hide the filthy lucre. I believe that the judge has asked for a forensic examination of his finances.

Considering the bulk of this judgement relates to legal costs (and lawyers always require paying) I think Mr Yaxley-Lennon would need to be a magician to avoid his assets being located...

[Grafenwalder]

Let's hope Mr Yaxley-Lennon has some BTE or ATE insurance cover or he's going to be insolvent and lose his house (a bit like Katie Hopkins...)

He's been moving his assets for months, dissolving or changing companies to try to hide the filthy lucre. I believe that the judge has asked for a forensic examination of his finances.

Considering the bulk of this judgement relates to legal costs (and lawyers always require paying) I think Mr Yaxley-Lennon would need to be a magician to avoid his assets being located...

The beauty of it is that £500k is just the prosecutions costs, his legal costs are in addition to that. I imagine he's nursing a sore head tonight!

[Cactus Jack]

You forget to those who benefit from dividing and ruling the working class £500k or ten times that amount is just a wise investment repaid many times over.

As long as Yaxley Lennon renounces his Romany heritage and pretends to be English and suckers enough people into believing in him he'll end up in profit

[Grafenwalder]

More detail from the trial:

Robinson, who represented himself, argued his comments were substantially true, claiming to have ‘uncovered dozens of accounts of aggressive, abusive and deceitful behaviour’ by Mr Hijazi.

However, Mr Justice Nicklin said: ‘The defendant took on the burden of proving his allegations to be true. He has failed.

‘In reality, and for the reasons I have explained, his evidence fell woefully short. He has, however, persisted with the serious allegations he originally made, and has even added to them during the proceedings."

So the scummy little bastard was still stirring his pot of hatred during legal proceedings. The gobshite motormouth just doesn't know when to shut up.

The judge said Robinson’s videos were ‘calculated to inflame the situation’ and said Mr Hijazi predictably became the target of abuse and had to leave his home and abandon his education.

He continued: ‘The defendant is responsible for this harm, some of the scars of which, particularly the impact on the claimant’s education, are likely last for many years, if not a lifetime.’

I don't like the sound of this bit though; The judge acknowledged ‘there are limits on what can be enforced’ as a result of Robinson’s bankruptcy. What about all the donations he's scammed? Seize that.

His vile arrogance is boundless;

The judge also granted Mr Hijazi an injunction against Robinson, preventing him from repeating the allegations made against him.

Robinson said he had been commissioned to make a film about the incident which was ‘already made’.

He added: ‘It’s left for the viewer to make their mind (up) on what’s happened.’

Robinson told the judge that, by granting an injunction, ‘it will look like you are trying to prevent it (the film), but the film will go out in the United States anyway, so I don’t see the point’.

https://metro.co.uk/2021/07/23/tommy-ro ... i=14976294

[Raggamuffin]

It's a bit silly for him to say his claims were true - didn't he admit that they weren't?

Two other things - the absurd cost of this kind of legal action, and the issue of people harassing the boy just because of what TR said. What is wrong with people?

[Grafenwalder]

It's a bit silly for him to say his claims were true - didn't he admit that they weren't?

Two other things - the absurd cost of this kind of legal action, and the issue of people harassing the boy just because of what TR said. What is wrong with people?

Yackety Yaxley has built a career off the back of lies, fraud and deception. He's never been known for honesty.

He had a choice and plenty of opportunity to avoid an "absurd cost", but he's an asshole so now he's got to pay. Hopefully the court will seize whatever assets they can.

[Raggamuffin]

It's a bit silly for him to say his claims were true - didn't he admit that they weren't?

Two other things - the absurd cost of this kind of legal action, and the issue of people harassing the boy just because of what TR said. What is wrong with people?

Yackety Yaxley has built a career off the back of lies, fraud and deception. He's never been known for honesty.

He had a choice and plenty of opportunity to avoid an "absurd cost", but he's an asshole so now he's got to pay. Hopefully the court will seize whatever assets they can.

He admitted shortly after the claims that he had been misinformed, and he said so publically. The question is - if his followers heard the claim and then heard the retraction, why did the boy get abuse?

I think this sort of problem is going to get worse. Some people think that saying something on social media is the same as saying it in a pub. Of course it's not because of the number of people who read about or hear the claims.

It's surely only a matter of time before Tommy R is libelled and he makes a ton of money out of it. People need to think about what they're saying before they say it - especially him.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/tomm ... 05301.html

[Grafenwalder]

It's a bit silly for him to say his claims were true - didn't he admit that they weren't?

Two other things - the absurd cost of this kind of legal action, and the issue of people harassing the boy just because of what TR said. What is wrong with people?

Yackety Yaxley has built a career off the back of lies, fraud and deception. He's never been known for honesty.

He had a choice and plenty of opportunity to avoid an "absurd cost", but he's an asshole so now he's got to pay. Hopefully the court will seize whatever assets they can.

He admitted shortly after the claims that he had been misinformed, and he said so publically. The question is - if his followers heard the claim and then heard the retraction, why did the boy get abuse?

I think this sort of problem is going to get worse. Some people think that saying something on social media is the same as saying it in a pub. Of course it's not because of the number of people who read about or hear the claims.

It's surely only a matter of time before Tommy R is libelled and he makes a ton of money out of it. People need to think about what they're saying before they say it - especially him.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/tomm ... 05301.html

The Syrian schoolboys family suffered abuse as a result of Yaxleys lies and had to move. Yaxley knew he'd committed libel and should have withdrawn it with a full apology. He didn't so they took him to court where he lost - BIG time.

I don't give a flying fig how much he gets creamed for and hope he suffers from it. He's such an arrogant little git he was still busy fanning the flames of Muslim hate during the proceedings.

[Raggamuffin]

It's a bit silly for him to say his claims were true - didn't he admit that they weren't?

Two other things - the absurd cost of this kind of legal action, and the issue of people harassing the boy just because of what TR said. What is wrong with people?

Yackety Yaxley has built a career off the back of lies, fraud and deception. He's never been known for honesty.

He had a choice and plenty of opportunity to avoid an "absurd cost", but he's an asshole so now he's got to pay. Hopefully the court will seize whatever assets they can.

He admitted shortly after the claims that he had been misinformed, and he said so publically. The question is - if his followers heard the claim and then heard the retraction, why did the boy get abuse?

I think this sort of problem is going to get worse. Some people think that saying something on social media is the same as saying it in a pub. Of course it's not because of the number of people who read about or hear the claims.

It's surely only a matter of time before Tommy R is libelled and he makes a ton of money out of it. People need to think about what they're saying before they say it - especially him.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/tomm ... 05301.html

The Syrian schoolboys family suffered abuse as a result of Yaxleys lies and had to move. Yaxley knew he'd committed libel and should have withdrawn it with a full apology. He didn't so they took him to court where he lost - BIG time.

I don't give a flying fig how much he gets creamed for and hope he suffers from it. He's such an arrogant little git he was still busy fanning the flames of Muslim hate during the proceedings.

He admitted it was fake news, although he didn't apologise.

Are you not at all concerned about the people who abused or threatened the boy? Shouldn't they be hunted down and prosecuted?

[Grafenwalder]

It's a bit silly for him to say his claims were true - didn't he admit that they weren't?

Two other things - the absurd cost of this kind of legal action, and the issue of people harassing the boy just because of what TR said. What is wrong with people?

Yackety Yaxley has built a career off the back of lies, fraud and deception. He's never been known for honesty.

He had a choice and plenty of opportunity to avoid an "absurd cost", but he's an asshole so now he's got to pay. Hopefully the court will seize whatever assets they can.

He admitted shortly after the claims that he had been misinformed, and he said so publically. The question is - if his followers heard the claim and then heard the retraction, why did the boy get abuse?

I think this sort of problem is going to get worse. Some people think that saying something on social media is the same as saying it in a pub. Of course it's not because of the number of people who read about or hear the claims.

It's surely only a matter of time before Tommy R is libelled and he makes a ton of money out of it. People need to think about what they're saying before they say it - especially him.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/tomm ... 05301.html

The Syrian schoolboys family suffered abuse as a result of Yaxleys lies and had to move. Yaxley knew he'd committed libel and should have withdrawn it with a full apology. He didn't so they took him to court where he lost - BIG time.

I don't give a flying fig how much he gets creamed for and hope he suffers from it. He's such an arrogant little git he was still busy fanning the flames of Muslim hate during the proceedings.

He admitted it was fake news, although he didn't apologise.

Are you not at all concerned about the people who abused or threatened the boy? Shouldn't they be hunted down and prosecuted?

Yaxley committed the libel, not them, hence the reason he was in court.

[Raggamuffin]

Yaxley committed the libel, not them, hence the reason he was in court.

That was a civil case though. Do you not think they should be prosecuted? After all, they went after the poor boy.

If you don't think so, why is that? Perhaps you think that people aren't responsible for their actions.

[Grafenwalder]

Yaxley committed the libel, not them, hence the reason he was in court.

That was a civil case though. Do you not think they should be prosecuted? After all, they went after the poor boy.

If you don't think so, why is that? Perhaps you think that people aren't responsible for their actions.

The 16 year old boy who set on him outside the school was interviewed by West Yorkshire Police and reported for summons for an offence of assault.

Some people don't think they have to take responsibility for their actions and believe they are above the law - Yaxley is one of them.

[Raggamuffin]

Yaxley committed the libel, not them, hence the reason he was in court.

That was a civil case though. Do you not think they should be prosecuted? After all, they went after the poor boy.

If you don't think so, why is that? Perhaps you think that people aren't responsible for their actions.

The 16 year old boy who set on him outside the school was interviewed by West Yorkshire Police and reported for summons for an offence of assault.

Some people don't think they have to take responsibility for their actions and believe they are above the law - Yaxley is one of them.

Wasn't there abuse towards the Syrian boy after Tommy got it wrong though? That's what I was talking about. Do you not hold them responsible for their own behaviour?

[Grafenwalder]

Yaxley committed the libel, not them, hence the reason he was in court.

That was a civil case though. Do you not think they should be prosecuted? After all, they went after the poor boy.

If you don't think so, why is that? Perhaps you think that people aren't responsible for their actions.

The 16 year old boy who set on him outside the school was interviewed by West Yorkshire Police and reported for summons for an offence of assault.

Some people don't think they have to take responsibility for their actions and believe they are above the law - Yaxley is one of them.

Wasn't there abuse towards the Syrian boy after Tommy got it wrong though? That's what I was talking about. Do you not hold them responsible for their own behaviour?

I think that was the online abuse which resulted in the Hijazi family moving from the area. Everyone is responsible for their own behaviour, sadly some don't take it and are incapable of making any adult decisions. They look for a "leader" they can fawn over who will tell them what to do, what to think, and what they should believe.