False dichotomy...

False dichotomy...

Postby Maddog » Wed Jul 14, 2021 2:50 pm

A false dilemma, also referred to as false dichotomy, is an informal fallacy based on a premise that erroneously limits what options are available. The source of the fallacy lies not in an invalid form of inference but in a false premise. This premise has the form of a disjunctive claim: it asserts that one among a number of alternatives must be true.

This disjunction is problematic because it oversimplifies the choice by excluding viable alternatives. For example, a false dilemma is committed when it is claimed that, "Stacey spoke out against capitalism; therefore, she must be a communist"............... :thumbsup:


Let me provide two others.

Bob thinks kneeling is stupid, therefore he supports racism.

Bob thinks Biden is a blabbering idiot, therefore he supports Trump..


Most positions are a bit more complex and nuanced to apply this overly simplistic view to them.

Carry on. :more beer:
User avatar
Maddog
 
Posts: 38385
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:46 am

Re: False dichotomy...

Postby Cactus Jack » Wed Jul 14, 2021 5:46 pm

It's something you use all the time and you start crying like a little bitch when it gets pointed out

It's also not a new item
User avatar
Cactus Jack
 
Posts: 21801
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Round yer somewhere

Re: False dichotomy...

Postby Maddog » Wed Jul 14, 2021 6:11 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:It's something you use all the time and you start crying like a little bitch when it gets pointed out

It's also not a new item

:twirl:
User avatar
Maddog
 
Posts: 38385
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:46 am

Re: False dichotomy...

Postby Maddog » Wed Jul 21, 2021 4:57 pm

Maddog wrote:A false dilemma, also referred to as false dichotomy, is an informal fallacy based on a premise that erroneously limits what options are available. The source of the fallacy lies not in an invalid form of inference but in a false premise. This premise has the form of a disjunctive claim: it asserts that one among a number of alternatives must be true.

This disjunction is problematic because it oversimplifies the choice by excluding viable alternatives. For example, a false dilemma is committed when it is claimed that, "Stacey spoke out against capitalism; therefore, she must be a communist"............... :thumbsup:


Let me provide two others.

Bob thinks kneeling is stupid, therefore he supports racism.

Bob thinks Biden is a blabbering idiot, therefore he supports Trump..


Most positions are a bit more complex and nuanced to apply this overly simplistic view to them.

Carry on. :more beer:



Bringing this back up for CJ.

Now focus.

THERE CAN BE MORE THAN TWO POSTIONS AVAILABLE. :leer:
User avatar
Maddog
 
Posts: 38385
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:46 am


Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests