Tori wrote:LEGENDARY wrote:Well accusations of wife beating could be taken quite seriously Shiney you know and the term 'the world and his wife' is not on par with 'beating your wife', unless it is soo commonplace in Yorkshire Shiney old bean...
From Wikipedia:
"A loaded question is a question which contains a controversial or unjustified assumption, e.g., a presumption of guilt.
Aside from being a logical fallacy, such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda. The traditional example is the question "Have you stopped beating your wife?" Whether the respondent answers yes or no, he will admit to having a wife, and having beaten her at some time in the past. Thus, these facts are presupposed by the question, and in this case an entrapment, because it narrows the respondent to a single answer, and the fallacy of many questions has been committed. The fallacy relies upon context for its effect: the fact that a question presupposes something does not in itself make the question fallacious. Only when some of these presuppositions are not necessarily agreed to by the person who is asked the question does the argument containing them become fallacious. Hence the same question may be loaded in one context, but not in the other. For example the previous question would not be loaded if it was asked during a trial in which the defendant has already admitted to beating his wife."
I hope that clears the matter up to your satisfaction.
Doesn't I am afraid Shiney...
