Holly wrote:I'm ridiculous???
I give up...I have better things to do than help you pass the time by pointless arguing....
I'm sure you have - like approving posts slagging me off.
Holly wrote:I'm ridiculous???
I give up...I have better things to do than help you pass the time by pointless arguing....
Raggamuffin wrote:Guest wrote:Get real, enabling is the act of letting someone get away with it by complying with the bad behaviour. You'd soon be wanting answers if she went through with her threat and put your picture or name and address out there. I highly doubt you'd just shrug your shoulders and say it was pointless asking.Raggamuffin wrote:Guest wrote:Yet again Lexi avoided answering questions. She always does it. People ask her for those answers and you accuse them of bullying instead of pulling her up on her bull, you are enabling her.Raggamuffin wrote:
No I didn't, I asked a further question. Victoria did not follow it up, so have a go at her instead.
The only people "enabling" her are the ones who rushed over here to slag her off, and the mods who are approving those posts.
This isn't about this though is it? It's about her health, and it's post after post after post just slagging her off, which is completely pointless because she just replies to them. Then there are people saying she should be banned - perhaps so they can slag her off without impunity.
Raggamuffin wrote:Holly wrote:I'm ridiculous???
I give up...I have better things to do than help you pass the time by pointless arguing....
I'm sure you have - like approving posts slagging me off.
Holly wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:Holly wrote:I'm ridiculous???
I give up...I have better things to do than help you pass the time by pointless arguing....
I'm sure you have - like approving posts slagging me off.
What post do you think I approved that slagged you off ?...I actually disapprove a lot of them...FFS give it up woman...
Snuffleupagus wrote:
I don't think anyone should be banned, unless they break the T&Cs.
For instance a lot of folk don't like what Andrea posts, but that's what she posts - horses for courses and all that.
Raggamuffin wrote:Holly wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:Holly wrote:I'm ridiculous???
I give up...I have better things to do than help you pass the time by pointless arguing....
I'm sure you have - like approving posts slagging me off.
What post do you think I approved that slagged you off ?...I actually disapprove a lot of them...FFS give it up woman...
Give what up? If you don't want me to reply to you, don't address me when my posts are nothing to do with you.
Raggamuffin wrote:Snuffleupagus wrote:
I don't think anyone should be banned, unless they break the T&Cs.
For instance a lot of folk don't like what Andrea posts, but that's what she posts - horses for courses and all that.
Starting a thread on whether someone should be banned or not is just bullying IMO.
Snuffleupagus wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:Snuffleupagus wrote:
I don't think anyone should be banned, unless they break the T&Cs.
For instance a lot of folk don't like what Andrea posts, but that's what she posts - horses for courses and all that.
Starting a thread on whether someone should be banned or not is just bullying IMO.
Of course it is, and that was exactly the aim of starting it.
Raggamuffin wrote:Snuffleupagus wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:Snuffleupagus wrote:
I don't think anyone should be banned, unless they break the T&Cs.
For instance a lot of folk don't like what Andrea posts, but that's what she posts - horses for courses and all that.
Starting a thread on whether someone should be banned or not is just bullying IMO.
Of course it is, and that was exactly the aim of starting it.
Well that's what I'm objecting to, but I get shouted down. It's dreadful the way so many people on here approve of bullying.
Guest wrote:Lexi why are you using Canny's real name as your avi on that forum ? Some friend you turned out to be !
Stooo wrote:People are entitled to their opinion, calls for bans are ignored.
There are no multiple threads, there are two. Blackdahlia started another one that was moved to RCT.
blackdahliaxxx wrote:Guest wrote:Lexi why are you ......!
Just poppin in has popped out again.
He didn't last long
Raggamuffin wrote:Stooo wrote:People are entitled to their opinion, calls for bans are ignored.
There are no multiple threads, there are two. Blackdahlia started another one that was moved to RCT.
The second thread was unnecessary.
Stooo wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:Stooo wrote:People are entitled to their opinion, calls for bans are ignored.
There are no multiple threads, there are two. Blackdahlia started another one that was moved to RCT.
The second thread was unnecessary.
As I said, people are entitled to their opinion and that includes you.
Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests