The debate will no doubt rumble on for a long while yet.
I always find the Broome Titanosaur footprint remarkable because sauropods had very small feet for their unmatchable size and at 1.7 metres long it is simply gigantic.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-new ... 180962680/http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-27/w ... wa/8391098http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-39405167We are talking of animals in the 50-60 metre and 150-200 ton range (at least) but the only bone we have on an animal of this scale (the fabled
Amphicoelias vertebra is long gone) is now the gigantic cervical from a 50 metre fully mature adult
Barosaurus - time will tell if any more complete remains of the behemoths who made the tracks at broome and others supersize footprints (at Plagne for example) will ever be found.
This section on the Sauropod Vertebra Picture Of The Week is very interesting for those who would wish to explore the topic further.
https://svpow.com/category/size/Here is an old article (from 2009) on the subject of such footprints.
https://svpow.com/2009/10/13/how-big-we ... ackmakers/