Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

A right load of bollocks...

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby Major » Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:13 pm

By Laura Donnelly, Health Correspondent, and Andrew Marszal

More than three-quarters of people in some English towns are overweight or obese, as couch potato lifestyles and unhealthy diets become the norm, official statistics have found.
For the first time, England-wide data reveals the fattest and thinnest parts of England and the scale of the obesity crisis.
Overall, 64 per cent of adults in England are overweight or obese - with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 or over.
Copeland in west Cumbria is the fattest local authority area (75.9 per cent) followed by Doncaster, South Yorkshire, (74.4 per cent) East Lindsey, Lincolnshire (73.8 per cent), Ryedale, North Yorkshire (73.7 per cent), and Sedgemoor in Somerset (73.4 per cent).
Tam Fry, of the National Obesity Forum and chairman of the Child Growth Foundation, said the figures were “almost criminal” and that he feared that in some parts of the country the probem had become “insurmountable”.
User avatar
Major
Twat.
 
Posts: 5627
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:08 am

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby McAz » Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:14 pm

Major Starbold wrote:Copeland in west Cumbria is the fattest local authority area (75.9 per cent).


I blame Sellafield.
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby luddite » Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:56 pm

Major Starbold wrote:Copeland in west Cumbria is the fattest local authority area (75.9 per cent).


It was only 5.9% until Aziz moved there. :canny:
User avatar
luddite
 
Posts: 1232
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Upper Buggersdale

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby Stooo » Tue Jul 25, 2017 8:07 pm

Major Starbold wrote:If ya do not have proof, then make ASSUMPTIONS, MAKE IT UP, which is a typical site owner/mod system.

It seems stooo has got it in for me already. :cheers:


Already? I've known you for years...
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118705
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby McAz » Tue Jul 25, 2017 8:39 pm

luddite wrote:
Major Starbold wrote:Copeland in west Cumbria is the fattest local authority area (75.9 per cent).


It was only 5.9% until Aziz moved there. :canny:


I don't live there. :scratch:
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby Guest » Tue Jul 25, 2017 8:54 pm

luddite wrote:
Major Starbold wrote:Copeland in west Cumbria is the fattest local authority area (75.9 per cent).


It was only 5.9% until Aziz moved there. :canny:


Finally you are trolling in the right place :thumbsup:

Only took a few years. :thud:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby luddite » Wed Jul 26, 2017 6:43 am

Guest wrote:
luddite wrote:
Major Starbold wrote:Copeland in west Cumbria is the fattest local authority area (75.9 per cent).


It was only 5.9% until Aziz moved there. :canny:


Finally you are trolling in the right place :thumbsup:

Only took a few years. :thud:

I have a fan, a dumb one but a fan nevertheless. :cheers:
User avatar
luddite
 
Posts: 1232
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Upper Buggersdale

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby Maddog » Wed Jul 26, 2017 4:23 pm

This is one of the advantages that state run economies like N Korea and Venezuela have. Low obesity levels. :)
User avatar
Maddog
 
Posts: 38385
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:46 am

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby McAz » Wed Jul 26, 2017 5:10 pm

More than 2.2 billion people are “either near or living in poverty,” according to the United Nations Development Report released July 24.The study also found that about 1.2 billion people survive on the equivalent of $1.25 or less a day, while 12 percent of the world’s population (842 million people) suffer from chronic hunger.

These conditions of global suffering and deprivation are not due to any absolute shortage of resources. The world economy produces enough to provide a decent standard of living for every man, woman and child. But the distribution of wealth makes this impossible: the 85 wealthiest people in the world own as much as the 3.5 billion poorest people combined.


http://www.globalresearch.ca/capitalism-and-global-poverty-two-billion-poor-one-billion-hungry/5393262
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby luddite » Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:01 pm

What does near or living in poverty actually mean?

Flat screen only 40 inch?

Only one car?

No broad band?

What?
User avatar
luddite
 
Posts: 1232
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Upper Buggersdale

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby Stooo » Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:08 pm

luddite wrote:What does near or living in poverty actually mean?

Flat screen only 40 inch?

Only one car?

No broad band?

What?


Did Google not work? :dunno:
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118705
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby luddite » Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:14 pm

Stooo wrote:
luddite wrote:What does near or living in poverty actually mean?

Flat screen only 40 inch?

Only one car?

No broad band?

What?


Did Google not work? :dunno:

Is Google posting on here now Stooo? :dunno:
User avatar
luddite
 
Posts: 1232
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Upper Buggersdale

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby McAz » Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:14 pm

Stooo wrote:
luddite wrote:What does near or living in poverty actually mean?

Flat screen only 40 inch?

Only one car?

No broad band?

What?


Did Google not work? :dunno:


Nor reading apparently since poverty is substantially defined in the post... :dunno:

...about 1.2 billion people survive on the equivalent of $1.25 or less a day, while 12 percent of the world’s population (842 million people) suffer from chronic hunger.
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby luddite » Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:15 pm

McAz wrote:
Stooo wrote:
luddite wrote:What does near or living in poverty actually mean?

Flat screen only 40 inch?

Only one car?

No broad band?

What?


Did Google not work? :dunno:


Nor reading apparently since poverty is substantially defined in the post... :dunno:

...about 1.2 billion people survive on the equivalent of $1.25 or less a day, while 12 percent of the world’s population (842 million people) suffer from chronic hunger.

If you think I read all the bollocks that you post you're mistaken. :brickwall:
User avatar
luddite
 
Posts: 1232
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Upper Buggersdale

Re: Too Many Fat Porkers In UK & USA

Postby McAz » Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:16 pm

luddite wrote:
McAz wrote:
Stooo wrote:
luddite wrote:What does near or living in poverty actually mean?

Flat screen only 40 inch?

Only one car?

No broad band?

What?


Did Google not work? :dunno:


Nor reading apparently since poverty is substantially defined in the post... :dunno:

...about 1.2 billion people survive on the equivalent of $1.25 or less a day, while 12 percent of the world’s population (842 million people) suffer from chronic hunger.

If you think I read all the bollocks that you post you're mistaken. :brickwall:


I don't think about you at all. :dunno:
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests