Guest wrote:Markey mark wrote:Feline wrote:It's people like MM coming out with BS that is making those poor souls lose even more sympathy.
So much never got to them and lots of lies about them and what they were offered.
Bit odd Westminster council housing staff got a extra day off in the year , for their hard work , working over time finding vacant properties for the residents of grenfell , over a month period Westminster council found approx quarter of the property needed , most was turned down by the grenfell tennants , also London corporation of London offered to house think quarter of grenfell tennants , then you have Barnet, Southwark , Brent, Camden, Islington , hackney, harringgay, harrow, Richmond councils offering grenfell residents council flats in their area, but if many grenfell tenants refused to be rehouse in different parts of London , then they shouldn't moan about living in hostels
now you've just made it more councils. where's your evidence?
Markey mark wrote:Guest wrote:Markey mark wrote:Feline wrote:It's people like MM coming out with BS that is making those poor souls lose even more sympathy.
So much never got to them and lots of lies about them and what they were offered.
Bit odd Westminster council housing staff got a extra day off in the year , for their hard work , working over time finding vacant properties for the residents of grenfell , over a month period Westminster council found approx quarter of the property needed , most was turned down by the grenfell tennants , also London corporation of London offered to house think quarter of grenfell tennants , then you have Barnet, Southwark , Brent, Camden, Islington , hackney, harringgay, harrow, Richmond councils offering grenfell residents council flats in their area, but if many grenfell tenants refused to be rehouse in different parts of London , then they shouldn't moan about living in hostels
now you've just made it more councils. where's your evidence?
Get my information from the front line , My partner whose in charge of a London council housing department, Looks after 30,000 properties ,
Markey mark wrote:Guest wrote:Markey mark wrote:Feline wrote:It's people like MM coming out with BS that is making those poor souls lose even more sympathy.
So much never got to them and lots of lies about them and what they were offered.
Bit odd Westminster council housing staff got a extra day off in the year , for their hard work , working over time finding vacant properties for the residents of grenfell , over a month period Westminster council found approx quarter of the property needed , most was turned down by the grenfell tennants , also London corporation of London offered to house think quarter of grenfell tennants , then you have Barnet, Southwark , Brent, Camden, Islington , hackney, harringgay, harrow, Richmond councils offering grenfell residents council flats in their area, but if many grenfell tenants refused to be rehouse in different parts of London , then they shouldn't moan about living in hostels
now you've just made it more councils. where's your evidence?
Get my information from the front line , My partner whose in charge of a London council housing department, Looks after 30,000 properties ,
Markey mark wrote:Guest wrote:Markey mark wrote:Feline wrote:It's people like MM coming out with BS that is making those poor souls lose even more sympathy.
So much never got to them and lots of lies about them and what they were offered.
Bit odd Westminster council housing staff got a extra day off in the year , for their hard work , working over time finding vacant properties for the residents of grenfell , over a month period Westminster council found approx quarter of the property needed , most was turned down by the grenfell tennants , also London corporation of London offered to house think quarter of grenfell tennants , then you have Barnet, Southwark , Brent, Camden, Islington , hackney, harringgay, harrow, Richmond councils offering grenfell residents council flats in their area, but if many grenfell tenants refused to be rehouse in different parts of London , then they shouldn't moan about living in hostels
now you've just made it more councils. where's your evidence?
Get my information from the front line , My partner whose in charge of a London council housing department, Looks after 30,000 properties ,
Pinnochio wrote:Markey mark wrote:Guest wrote:Markey mark wrote:Feline wrote:It's people like MM coming out with BS that is making those poor souls lose even more sympathy.
So much never got to them and lots of lies about them and what they were offered.
Bit odd Westminster council housing staff got a extra day off in the year , for their hard work , working over time finding vacant properties for the residents of grenfell , over a month period Westminster council found approx quarter of the property needed , most was turned down by the grenfell tennants , also London corporation of London offered to house think quarter of grenfell tennants , then you have Barnet, Southwark , Brent, Camden, Islington , hackney, harringgay, harrow, Richmond councils offering grenfell residents council flats in their area, but if many grenfell tenants refused to be rehouse in different parts of London , then they shouldn't moan about living in hostels
now you've just made it more councils. where's your evidence?
Get my information from the front line , My partner whose in charge of a London council housing department, Looks after 30,000 properties ,
You are a fantasist and a bloody liar.
Markey mark wrote:
Just ask my partner about grenfell tennants , she said her council offered 44 flats to the victims of the fire , with her council and with other London councils offered flats , anyone that was on top of the waiting list could not bid for a flat , until the grenfell residents had the first offer , but few few did take flats in her council ward , but many of the genfell victims decided they want to stay put , properly the reason is 68 flats was brought by city of London council in Warwick ave for grenfell victims , these flats are very luxury flats each flat would cost in the millions to buy ,in door swimming pool and gym , some of the Grenfell residents were offered flats in Wolfe house part of the same development, the ones that haven’t been offered luxury flats are turning down flat after flat in all parts of London , holding out, properly hopeing to be offered luxury offered commadation hence why many of them are in shitty hotels , why should I lie about my girlfriend job , she been doing for years , but work her way through hard work to the top of her department. Anyway believe it or not , I sure do believe in what my partner says
Feline wrote:Markey mark wrote:
Just ask my partner about grenfell tennants , she said her council offered 44 flats to the victims of the fire , with her council and with other London councils offered flats , anyone that was on top of the waiting list could not bid for a flat , until the grenfell residents had the first offer , but few few did take flats in her council ward , but many of the genfell victims decided they want to stay put , properly the reason is 68 flats was brought by city of London council in Warwick ave for grenfell victims , these flats are very luxury flats each flat would cost in the millions to buy ,in door swimming pool and gym , some of the Grenfell residents were offered flats in Wolfe house part of the same development, the ones that haven’t been offered luxury flats are turning down flat after flat in all parts of London , holding out, properly hopeing to be offered luxury offered commadation hence why many of them are in shitty hotels , why should I lie about my girlfriend job , she been doing for years , but work her way through hard work to the top of her department. Anyway believe it or not , I sure do believe in what my partner says
Talking BS mate that has already been done to death, those flats are normal flats joined onto luxery ones, they have no use of the swiming pool or anything else.
Feline wrote:Markey mark wrote:
Just ask my partner about grenfell tennants , she said her council offered 44 flats to the victims of the fire , with her council and with other London councils offered flats , anyone that was on top of the waiting list could not bid for a flat , until the grenfell residents had the first offer , but few few did take flats in her council ward , but many of the genfell victims decided they want to stay put , properly the reason is 68 flats was brought by city of London council in Warwick ave for grenfell victims , these flats are very luxury flats each flat would cost in the millions to buy ,in door swimming pool and gym , some of the Grenfell residents were offered flats in Wolfe house part of the same development, the ones that haven’t been offered luxury flats are turning down flat after flat in all parts of London , holding out, properly hopeing to be offered luxury offered commadation hence why many of them are in shitty hotels , why should I lie about my girlfriend job , she been doing for years , but work her way through hard work to the top of her department. Anyway believe it or not , I sure do believe in what my partner says
Talking BS mate that has already been done to death, those flats are normal flats joined onto luxery ones, they have no use of the swiming pool or anything else.
Markey mark wrote:Feline wrote:Markey mark wrote:
Just ask my partner about grenfell tennants , she said her council offered 44 flats to the victims of the fire , with her council and with other London councils offered flats , anyone that was on top of the waiting list could not bid for a flat , until the grenfell residents had the first offer , but few few did take flats in her council ward , but many of the genfell victims decided they want to stay put , properly the reason is 68 flats was brought by city of London council in Warwick ave for grenfell victims , these flats are very luxury flats each flat would cost in the millions to buy ,in door swimming pool and gym , some of the Grenfell residents were offered flats in Wolfe house part of the same development, the ones that haven’t been offered luxury flats are turning down flat after flat in all parts of London , holding out, properly hopeing to be offered luxury offered commadation hence why many of them are in shitty hotels , why should I lie about my girlfriend job , she been doing for years , but work her way through hard work to the top of her department. Anyway believe it or not , I sure do believe in what my partner says
Talking BS mate that has already been done to death, those flats are normal flats joined onto luxery ones, they have no use of the swiming pool or anything else.
Been there mate , they have use of a swimming pool, if you happy to pay the charges in your service charges
Markey mark wrote:Feline wrote:Markey mark wrote:
Just ask my partner about grenfell tennants , she said her council offered 44 flats to the victims of the fire , with her council and with other London councils offered flats , anyone that was on top of the waiting list could not bid for a flat , until the grenfell residents had the first offer , but few few did take flats in her council ward , but many of the genfell victims decided they want to stay put , properly the reason is 68 flats was brought by city of London council in Warwick ave for grenfell victims , these flats are very luxury flats each flat would cost in the millions to buy ,in door swimming pool and gym , some of the Grenfell residents were offered flats in Wolfe house part of the same development, the ones that haven’t been offered luxury flats are turning down flat after flat in all parts of London , holding out, properly hopeing to be offered luxury offered commadation hence why many of them are in shitty hotels , why should I lie about my girlfriend job , she been doing for years , but work her way through hard work to the top of her department. Anyway believe it or not , I sure do believe in what my partner says
Talking BS mate that has already been done to death, those flats are normal flats joined onto luxery ones, they have no use of the swiming pool or anything else.
There’s no such thing as a normal flat in that part of town , people in that part of town will pay quarter of a million just for a garage , to live in these normal flats as you call them , your talking millions to buy ,
Feline wrote:Markey mark wrote:Feline wrote:Markey mark wrote:
Just ask my partner about grenfell tennants , she said her council offered 44 flats to the victims of the fire , with her council and with other London councils offered flats , anyone that was on top of the waiting list could not bid for a flat , until the grenfell residents had the first offer , but few few did take flats in her council ward , but many of the genfell victims decided they want to stay put , properly the reason is 68 flats was brought by city of London council in Warwick ave for grenfell victims , these flats are very luxury flats each flat would cost in the millions to buy ,in door swimming pool and gym , some of the Grenfell residents were offered flats in Wolfe house part of the same development, the ones that haven’t been offered luxury flats are turning down flat after flat in all parts of London , holding out, properly hopeing to be offered luxury offered commadation hence why many of them are in shitty hotels , why should I lie about my girlfriend job , she been doing for years , but work her way through hard work to the top of her department. Anyway believe it or not , I sure do believe in what my partner says
Talking BS mate that has already been done to death, those flats are normal flats joined onto luxery ones, they have no use of the swiming pool or anything else.
Murky Markys wife is wrong!!!!!
Her of the frontline knowledge?
The high flying high heeled wonder woman with a soft spot for the unable is wrong?
There’s no such thing as a normal flat in that part of town , people in that part of town will pay quarter of a million just for a garage , to live in these normal flats as you call them , your talking millions to buy ,
Step away from the MS media and hate sites. Go read the long thread on DS the flats are not the luxery flats.
Markey mark wrote:Just ask my partner about grenfell tennants , she said her council offered 44 flats to the victims of the fire , with her council and with other London councils offered flats , anyone that was on top of the waiting list could not bid for a flat , until the grenfell residents had the first offer , but few few did take flats in her council ward , but many of the genfell victims decided they want to stay put , properly the reason is 68 flats was brought by city of London council in Warwick ave for grenfell victims , these flats are very luxury flats each flat would cost in the millions to buy ,in door swimming pool and gym , some of the Grenfell residents were offered flats in Wolfe house part of the same development, the ones that haven’t been offered luxury flats are turning down flat after flat in all parts of London , holding out, properly hopeing to be offered luxury offered commadation hence why many of them are in shitty hotels , why should I lie about my girlfriend job , she been doing for years , but work her way through hard work to the top of her department. Anyway believe it or not , I sure do believe in what my partner says
Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests