Trapper John wrote:My 5 year old grandson has been telling me about some of his classmates and I have to say I find some of his accounts worrying and disturbing.
There appear to be be two children whose behaviour seems to affect the whole class, one a boy who is unruly and disruptive, rude and sometimes violent toward both teachers and children. At sometime or another I suspect we all had at least one of those in our classes at school, it seems to be a right of passage. My grandson's behaviour at home deteriorated due to his association with this boy, whose mother incidently is a teacher at a sister school. Fortunatley since moving up a class after the summer, my grandson has far less contact with this boy in both class and playground and the improvement in his manner is marked.
The situation with the other child is far more worrying I think. I have heard things about this girl several times in the past year, it seems she has 'learning difficulties' which by the looks of it have given her a free pass in behavioural matters.
On Monday, I collected my grandson from school and as the kids cleared out I saw this girl asleep on the floor. My grandson said "she's naughty, she's been asleep on the floor all afternoon" something I thought wasn't right, certainly not for the message it sends to the other kids. It transpires this wasn't the only occasion and that she does it quite often and thats not the least of it.
Last week, she wet herself in full view of the class like it was something normal and at playtime a few days later, covered her hands in her own excrement and proceeded to chase the other kids around the playground, laughing and threatening to wipe it on them. Now the school must be aware of her 'situation' as she has a one-to-one teaching assistant and the other children are asked to 'tolerate' her behaviour even though it is wrong.
Now I feel sorry for this kid, at 5 years old she cannot possibly be responsible for her actions, clearly there are many other factors in play here but I don't see why my grandson or his classmates should have to 'tolerate' her behaviour. I also have a certain amount of sympathy for the teaching staff who, after what I discovered, have their hands tied.
Guest wrote:some kids are going to school in nappies at that age. you have to wonder what the future holds for that poor girl.
Vicky wrote:Guest wrote:some kids are going to school in nappies at that age. you have to wonder what the future holds for that poor girl.
Aye a woman my mum worked with, her five year old son wasn't toilet trained and she said the teachers can do it, she had enough to do with her job and running a house.
Guest wrote:Vicky wrote:Guest wrote:some kids are going to school in nappies at that age. you have to wonder what the future holds for that poor girl.
Aye a woman my mum worked with, her five year old son wasn't toilet trained and she said the teachers can do it, she had enough to do with her job and running a house.
some parents are too selfish to have children.
Trapper John wrote:Guest wrote:Vicky wrote:Guest wrote:some kids are going to school in nappies at that age. you have to wonder what the future holds for that poor girl.
Aye a woman my mum worked with, her five year old son wasn't toilet trained and she said the teachers can do it, she had enough to do with her job and running a house.
some parents are too selfish to have children.
I would go as far as to say, some women should be sterilised so they can't have children.
Trapper John wrote:Guest wrote:Vicky wrote:Guest wrote:some kids are going to school in nappies at that age. you have to wonder what the future holds for that poor girl.
Aye a woman my mum worked with, her five year old son wasn't toilet trained and she said the teachers can do it, she had enough to do with her job and running a house.
some parents are too selfish to have children.
I would go as far as to say, some women should be sterilised so they can't have children.
Guest wrote:Trapper John wrote:Guest wrote:Vicky wrote:Guest wrote:some kids are going to school in nappies at that age. you have to wonder what the future holds for that poor girl.
Aye a woman my mum worked with, her five year old son wasn't toilet trained and she said the teachers can do it, she had enough to do with her job and running a house.
some parents are too selfish to have children.
I would go as far as to say, some women should be sterilised so they can't have children.
so should a lot of blokes, tj, why just women? it makes more sense to sterilise the blokes, they can father thousands of kids, women have a reproductive shelf life.
Trapper John wrote:
Well there is that ...........but! women have the children and are supposed to have the mothering instinct. Men on the otherhand can produce children and then have no further contact or impact on their lives. Lowlife fathers aren't the problem, lowlife mothers are.
Trapper John wrote:Guest wrote:Trapper John wrote:Guest wrote:some parents are too selfish to have children.
I would go as far as to say, some women should be sterilised so they can't have children.
so should a lot of blokes, tj, why just women? it makes more sense to sterilise the blokes, they can father thousands of kids, women have a reproductive shelf life.
Well there is that ...........but! women have the children and are supposed to have the mothering instinct. Men on the otherhand can produce children and then have no further contact or impact on their lives. Lowlife fathers aren't the problem, lowlife mothers are.
Guest wrote:Trapper John wrote:Guest wrote:Vicky wrote:Guest wrote:some kids are going to school in nappies at that age. you have to wonder what the future holds for that poor girl.
Aye a woman my mum worked with, her five year old son wasn't toilet trained and she said the teachers can do it, she had enough to do with her job and running a house.
some parents are too selfish to have children.
I would go as far as to say, some women should be sterilised so they can't have children.
so should a lot of blokes, tj, why just women? it makes more sense to sterilise the blokes, they can father thousands of kids, women have a reproductive shelf life.
NastyNickers wrote:Trapper John wrote:Guest wrote:Trapper John wrote:Guest wrote:some parents are too selfish to have children.
I would go as far as to say, some women should be sterilised so they can't have children.
so should a lot of blokes, tj, why just women? it makes more sense to sterilise the blokes, they can father thousands of kids, women have a reproductive shelf life.
Well there is that ...........but! women have the children and are supposed to have the mothering instinct. Men on the otherhand can produce children and then have no further contact or impact on their lives. Lowlife fathers aren't the problem, lowlife mothers are.
Oh what bollocks.
I'm amazed you gathered all this information through your 5 year old grandson... and the grapevine.
My 5 year old came home the other day and said they'd spent all day drinking in Thailand. They had an 'asian' style lunch. And don't get me started on the bollocks the parents gossip about.
NastyNickers wrote:
Oh what bollocks.
I'm amazed you gathered all this information through your 5 year old grandson... and the grapevine.
My 5 year old came home the other day and said they'd spent all day drinking in Thailand. They had an 'asian' style lunch. And don't get me started on the bollocks the parents gossip about.
Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 48 guests