HobbitFeet wrote:Trapper John wrote:HobbitFeet wrote:Trapper John wrote:HobbitFeet wrote:It's nothing new though
the sporting boycott of South Africa as a protest against apartheid went a long way to furthering the cause, sport does not stand outside human rights nor should it
however you should pick your battles wisely
From where I was sitting it did fuck all to be honest, sporting links being reinstated later was only due to the political climate being change by purely political means.
I don't think FW De Klerk sat down one day and said, "I gotta sort this mess out, I mean we don't get to play cricket against decent opposition anymore"
It brought it to the attention of people via the sporting world, or do you think the policy changed from the goodness of the ruling party's heart?
come on TJ you're clearly not this thick
I can assure you I'm not thick.
Sporting boycotts did nothing, full stop! - Sun City was a thriving centre of world sports from darts to snooker to cricketers taking the coin to play there.
I am old enough to know that that every news programme for 20 years or more carried some story about South Africa, Rhodesia and apartheid almost daily - so to suggest 'Sport' brought it to anyones attention is just fucking ridiculous.
you need to familiarise yourself with the D'Oliveira scandal - then maybe we can talk some more
I know all about Dolly's exclusion from the England test cricket squad. It was an incident thats all and had no bearing on the politics of South Africa nor did it make anyone 'more' aware than they already were.