Female Paedo

A right load of bollocks...

Re: Female Paedo

Postby McAz » Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:26 pm

Major Starbold wrote:Turdiz like McAz and paedos should be put down for the good of the world.


And when you're man enough to do it Big Boy, come on round. :pmsl:
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Guest » Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:33 pm

Vam wrote:
Guest wrote:
Vam wrote:WTF are "Turdiz"?? :ooer: :dunno:


oh gawd, you had to ask! :laughing:


Sorry, Guesty :smilin: English isn't my first language.


it isn't 'major's' either. :ooer:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Trapper John » Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:11 pm

Guest wrote:
Trapper John wrote:
Guest wrote:
Trapper John wrote:
Why's that then?


if they went to him & told him they'd been sexually assaulted by an adult he would think it was hilarious.


I thought the boy was 15 years old? ..... hardly a kid.

And before we get all sanctimonious about legal ages and child abuse, any boy at fifteen years old who didn't want to get down and grubby with a nice looking female teacher or older woman, is a fucking weirdo in my opinion and will probably need some psychiatric treatment in the future.

This bit makes me laugh:

It may be that on his part he wanted to brag about what was happening with you but at 15 he was not in a position to understand the long term effects that was going to have upon him


What fucking 'long term effects' are they then? .... and if he'd stabbed someone through the heart and killed them, would they still say "at 15 he was not in a position to understand the long term effects that was going to have upon him" would they fuck, it's all agenda driven bollocks.

Tell them the country is full to bursting with paedos and terrorists and they'll beg us to spy on them. :shake head:


that includes boys who have previously been sexually assaulted, boys who are gay, boys who are asexual & boys who have religious or cultural reasons for waiting until marriage.


Oh I see, so you think we should apply the logic that say if a hundred boys are told it's rice pudding for afters 97 say Yeeeesssss! but 3 don't like it, no-one gets rice pudding.

Yep typical neo liberal thinking. :roll:
User avatar
Trapper John
Gunner.
 
Posts: 35974
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:36 am
Location: Champions league next season - prediction date: 10/5/2018

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Guest » Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:22 pm

Trapper John wrote:
Guest wrote:
Trapper John wrote:
Guest wrote:
Trapper John wrote:
Why's that then?


if they went to him & told him they'd been sexually assaulted by an adult he would think it was hilarious.


I thought the boy was 15 years old? ..... hardly a kid.

And before we get all sanctimonious about legal ages and child abuse, any boy at fifteen years old who didn't want to get down and grubby with a nice looking female teacher or older woman, is a fucking weirdo in my opinion and will probably need some psychiatric treatment in the future.

This bit makes me laugh:

It may be that on his part he wanted to brag about what was happening with you but at 15 he was not in a position to understand the long term effects that was going to have upon him


What fucking 'long term effects' are they then? .... and if he'd stabbed someone through the heart and killed them, would they still say "at 15 he was not in a position to understand the long term effects that was going to have upon him" would they fuck, it's all agenda driven bollocks.

Tell them the country is full to bursting with paedos and terrorists and they'll beg us to spy on them. :shake head:


that includes boys who have previously been sexually assaulted, boys who are gay, boys who are asexual & boys who have religious or cultural reasons for waiting until marriage.


Oh I see, so you think we should apply the logic that say if a hundred boys are told it's rice pudding for afters 97 say Yeeeesssss! but 3 don't like it, no-one gets rice pudding.

Yep typical neo liberal thinking. :roll:


which is precisely why your particular dinner lady went down for 5 years, tj, the judge doesn't think rice pudding was suitable either.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Guest » Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:08 pm

Trapper John wrote:
Guest wrote:
Trapper John wrote:
Guest wrote:
Trapper John wrote:
Why's that then?


if they went to him & told him they'd been sexually assaulted by an adult he would think it was hilarious.


I thought the boy was 15 years old? ..... hardly a kid.

And before we get all sanctimonious about legal ages and child abuse, any boy at fifteen years old who didn't want to get down and grubby with a nice looking female teacher or older woman, is a fucking weirdo in my opinion and will probably need some psychiatric treatment in the future.

This bit makes me laugh:

It may be that on his part he wanted to brag about what was happening with you but at 15 he was not in a position to understand the long term effects that was going to have upon him


What fucking 'long term effects' are they then? .... and if he'd stabbed someone through the heart and killed them, would they still say "at 15 he was not in a position to understand the long term effects that was going to have upon him" would they fuck, it's all agenda driven bollocks.

Tell them the country is full to bursting with paedos and terrorists and they'll beg us to spy on them. :shake head:


that includes boys who have previously been sexually assaulted, boys who are gay, boys who are asexual & boys who have religious or cultural reasons for waiting until marriage.


Oh I see, so you think we should apply the logic that say if a hundred boys are told it's rice pudding for afters 97 say Yeeeesssss! but 3 don't like it, no-one gets rice pudding.

Yep typical neo liberal thinking. :roll:


Hey paper boy, is a neo liberal the same as a lefty liberal or a progressive liberal? Or are they three different types of liberal?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Stooo » Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:17 pm

Guest wrote:
Hey paper boy, is a neo liberal the same as a lefty liberal or a progressive liberal? Or are they three different types of liberal?


Actual Liberals find this frustrating... :again?:
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118835
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Lady Murasaki » Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:27 pm

Is paper boy meant to be a dig?
A dig at someone who does an honest days work?
User avatar
Lady Murasaki
 
Posts: 37246
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:46 pm

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Guest » Fri Dec 08, 2017 8:06 pm

Lady Murasaki wrote:Is paper boy meant to be a dig?
A dig at someone who does an honest days work?

It's a term of affliction.

And paper boy doesn't mind, do you paper boy?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Lady Murasaki » Fri Dec 08, 2017 8:46 pm

Guest wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Is paper boy meant to be a dig?
A dig at someone who does an honest days work?

It's a term of affliction.

And paper boy doesn't mind, do you paper boy?


So a dig.
From someone who probably never did a honest days work in their life.
User avatar
Lady Murasaki
 
Posts: 37246
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:46 pm

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Trapper John » Sat Dec 09, 2017 7:25 am

Lady Murasaki wrote:
Guest wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Is paper boy meant to be a dig?
A dig at someone who does an honest days work?

It's a term of affliction.

And paper boy doesn't mind, do you paper boy?


So a dig.
From someone who probably never did a honest days work in their life.


He's fine, it's my pet gimp. Some days I let it out, some days it escapes.
User avatar
Trapper John
Gunner.
 
Posts: 35974
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:36 am
Location: Champions league next season - prediction date: 10/5/2018

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Trapper John » Sat Dec 09, 2017 7:49 am

Lady Murasaki wrote:Is paper boy meant to be a dig?
A dig at someone who does an honest days work?


I once told that one of the contracts I worked on was distributing most of the National newspapers titles to wholesalers like WH Smith & Menzies overnight, thats where it got it from. The term hardly sends me into fits of rage, it's what we all used to call each other anyway, whenever we got put on that job.

What is a bit silly of gimp is that it would think it's attempt at derision is clever or original, it's the proverbial 'if I had a pound for every time.......' :laughing:

On the bright side of that contract, I did find out breaking news before most and I was extremely popular with friends and relatives moving house, not to mention those with a new puppy or kitten. As we were given a free newspaper of every title, every night, I soon collected enough to have built a full scale model of the Titanic in Papier-mâché. :smilin:
User avatar
Trapper John
Gunner.
 
Posts: 35974
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:36 am
Location: Champions league next season - prediction date: 10/5/2018

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Lady Murasaki » Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:30 am

Digging at someone for their job is a bit lame though.
Especially when there are so many better reasons to dig at you.
User avatar
Lady Murasaki
 
Posts: 37246
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:46 pm

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Nucks » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:09 am

Lady Murasaki wrote:Digging at someone for their job is a bit lame though.
Especially when there are so many better reasons to dig at you.


I thought it was a reference to the paper bag the guests wear? :gigglesnshit:
User avatar
Nucks
 
Posts: 9032
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:59 am
Location: Behind the curtains

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Lady Murasaki » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:20 am

Canucklehead wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Digging at someone for their job is a bit lame though.
Especially when there are so many better reasons to dig at you.


I thought it was a reference to the paper bag the guests wear? :gigglesnshit:


No, it appears to be aimed at TJ.
User avatar
Lady Murasaki
 
Posts: 37246
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:46 pm

Re: Female Paedo

Postby Nucks » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:23 am

Lady Murasaki wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Digging at someone for their job is a bit lame though.
Especially when there are so many better reasons to dig at you.


I thought it was a reference to the paper bag the guests wear? :gigglesnshit:


No, it appears to be aimed at TJ.


Ah, my bad, I misread the quotes there. :oops:
User avatar
Nucks
 
Posts: 9032
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:59 am
Location: Behind the curtains

PreviousNext

Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests