Meghan.

A right load of bollocks...

Re: Meghan.

Postby Dean » Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:41 pm

Major wrote:In my mind I guessed that PARTICULAR photo of Maureen would be shown, I can read some of you like a book who I have been hand feeding for years, pathetic creatures, lol lol lol

Rolly and McTurdybum always bite, not surprising knowing my angling skillz. lol lol lol


At least you’re old so you’ll be dead soon. That’s a positive I suppose...
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 47578
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:02 pm

Re: Meghan.

Postby Major » Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:48 pm

Dean wrote:
Major wrote:In my mind I guessed that PARTICULAR photo of Maureen would be shown, I can read some of you like a book who I have been hand feeding for years, pathetic creatures, lol lol lol

Rolly and McTurdybum always bite, not surprising knowing my angling skillz. lol lol lol


At least you’re old so you’ll be dead soon. That’s a positive I suppose...


Your just a vile evil piece of SH** Dean, ya always have been and get away with it, wonder why when others get told off or more
User avatar
Major
Twat.
 
Posts: 5627
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:08 am

Re: Meghan.

Postby Dean » Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:49 pm

Major wrote:
Dean wrote:
Major wrote:In my mind I guessed that PARTICULAR photo of Maureen would be shown, I can read some of you like a book who I have been hand feeding for years, pathetic creatures, lol lol lol

Rolly and McTurdybum always bite, not surprising knowing my angling skillz. lol lol lol


At least you’re old so you’ll be dead soon. That’s a positive I suppose...


Your just a vile evil piece of SH** Dean, ya always have been and get away with it, wonder why when others get told off or more


Snowflake... :roll:
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 47578
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:02 pm

Re: Meghan.

Postby guest » Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:53 pm

Major wrote:
Dean wrote:
Major wrote:In my mind I guessed that PARTICULAR photo of Maureen would be shown, I can read some of you like a book who I have been hand feeding for years, pathetic creatures, lol lol lol

Rolly and McTurdybum always bite, not surprising knowing my angling skillz. lol lol lol


At least you’re old so you’ll be dead soon. That’s a positive I suppose...


Your just a vile evil piece of SH** Dean, ya always have been and get away with it, wonder why when others get told off or more


You should try looking in the mirror, perhaps someone should take a broken bottle to you :dunno:
User avatar
guest
 

Re: Meghan.

Postby Text » Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:53 pm

Image

Been wondering why the blotchy pic in the OP /\ /\ has no resemblance to the many other pics of the lady at the same event in Brixton. Like this one for example: >>

Image


Then the answer came to me suddenly, in an epiphany, eureka moment!! I almost jumped up & said ''got it!!'' :yess:

See my next post. :thumbsup:
User avatar
Text
 
Posts: 25657
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:21 pm

Re: Meghan.

Postby Guest » Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:53 pm

i think it's very romantic that her occupation will be listed as 'princess of the united kingdom' on her babies' birth certificates. she is a stunningly pretty breath of fresh air & she has made harry happier than he's ever been. he's a young man that could so easily have gone off the rails but he's found his soul mate.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Meghan.

Postby Text » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:06 pm

As a total technophobe myself, even I know that there are simple Microsoft Word tools that can change a pic radically, in seconds. Tools for highlighting the minute details. It took only 2 or 3 clicks (less than a minute) to convert the pic below on the left (an ordinary, untampered pic of aan attractive lady) .... to the pic on the right. The spots on her neck have been highlighted and the coloration around her hairline is more saturated, etc.


I did not manually fill the woman's face with spots, blotches & blemishes. I just clicked buttons to highlight and magnify the details and generally sharpen the focus.
I imagine forensics use this tool a lot for clarifying blurred images on CCTV



Image

BINGO! :thumbsup:

..
User avatar
Text
 
Posts: 25657
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:21 pm

Re: Meghan.

Postby Big Fat Frosty » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:10 pm

is that how you lure your members....
cover there spots
:dunno:
Last edited by Big Fat Frosty on Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Big Fat Frosty
 
Posts: 17365
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 3:51 pm

Re: Meghan.

Postby McAz » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:12 pm

Canary wrote:As a total technophobe myself, even I know that there are simple Microsoft Word tools that can change a pic radically, in seconds.


I think you're right Canny - a google search reveals that it's a unique picture.

Someone has doctored it. Did you do it starbold so that you could make unpleasant comments? :shake head:
Last edited by McAz on Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: Meghan.

Postby Text » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:13 pm

Someone (probably on a RW site) has gone to a lot of trouble to make a nice looking lady look like awful, as if her skin is superblotchy and her make up was applied by a 5 year old.

Poetic justice that the woman received many compliments in this thread. :laughing:
User avatar
Text
 
Posts: 25657
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:21 pm

Re: Meghan.

Postby Text » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:16 pm

Big Fat Frosty wrote:is that how you lure your members....
cover there spots
:dunno:


Please say ''their''. You've been wrongly saying ''there'' for 6 years!
(Nah I don't mind their spots, I like them warts & all.)
User avatar
Text
 
Posts: 25657
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:21 pm

Re: Meghan.

Postby McAz » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:17 pm

Canary wrote:Someone (probably on a RW site) has gone to a lot of trouble to make a nice looking lady look like awful, as if her skin is superblotchy and her make up was applied by a 5 year old.


How utterly cheap - and yet more evidence of the cowardice of racists. :shake head:
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: Meghan.

Postby Big Fat Frosty » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:19 pm

Canary wrote:
Big Fat Frosty wrote:is that how you lure your members....
cover there spots
:dunno:


Please say ''their''. You've been saying ''there for 6 years!''
(Nah i don't mind their spots, I like them warts & all.)

apart from spelling
you allow racist but dont like bad gramma
:dunno:
User avatar
Big Fat Frosty
 
Posts: 17365
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 3:51 pm

Re: Meghan.

Postby Stooo » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:24 pm

Major wrote:
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Under the circumstances I think it's time Major put up his picture .....


That is taboo Rolly and against good advice from our forum management,


I've posted my pic loads of times...
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118841
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: Meghan.

Postby jp761 » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:41 pm

Major wrote:In my mind I guessed that PARTICULAR photo of Maureen would be shown, I can read some of you like a book who I have been hand feeding for years, pathetic creatures, lol lol lol

Rolly and McTurdybum always bite, not surprising knowing my angling skillz. lol lol lol

Major, I don't follow your posts as much as some people. I have seen the accusations though. So I'm wondering if you find anyone who isn't white, gorgeous?

For example Major.. just watch tonight's episode of The One Show(if you haven't already). Two of the finest looking women you'll ever see, I think so. Josephine Jobert and Michelle Ackerley.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests

cron