Vicks wrote:Misleading thread.
He doesn't actually work for Amazon, he's employed by a delivery firm Amazon use.
It's THEM who say he must pay for the parcels, not Amazon.
Snookerballs wrote:Vicks wrote:Misleading thread.
He doesn't actually work for Amazon, he's employed by a delivery firm Amazon use.
It's THEM who say he must pay for the parcels, not Amazon.
Starbold never actually reads the links he posts,
He can never seem to get beyond the Headline !!
Guest wrote:Snookerballs wrote:Vicks wrote:Misleading thread.
He doesn't actually work for Amazon, he's employed by a delivery firm Amazon use.
It's THEM who say he must pay for the parcels, not Amazon.
Starbold never actually reads the links he posts,
He can never seem to get beyond the Headline !!
attention span incontinence.
McAz wrote:They should form or join unions and fight for their rights as millions have done before them.
Trapper John wrote:McAz wrote:They should form or join unions and fight for their rights as millions have done before them.
Not that easy, the employer has to agree to allow a union to represent it's employees, if they won't then thats the end of that.
Snookerballs wrote:Vicks wrote:Misleading thread.
He doesn't actually work for Amazon, he's employed by a delivery firm Amazon use.
It's THEM who say he must pay for the parcels, not Amazon.
Starbold never actually reads the links he posts,
He can never seem to get beyond the Headline !!
Goodwife wrote:The end of the article says he wont have to pay for the parcels but may have to pay for the damages to the vehicle.
Honestly you would think these kind of practices would be outlawed by the government. The agency should have insurance on its vehicles and goods in transit insurance to cover the vehicle theft and susequent damage and the loss of the parcels.
Forcing the employee to pay for something "out of his control" is a bit scrooge like.
It does also say that he was last paid 19th December so it's 6 days pay.
I didn't read many comments but some of the more cynical DM readers think the theft was an inside job and he wasn't actually robbed.
Markey mark wrote:Part of me feel sorry for him , then there’s a part saying what idiot leave one wallet in the cab , he said he dropped the keys and someone out of nowhere pushed him and grabbed the keys and drove off , didn’t he put up a fight he big enough, regarding the damage to the works van , along he has a police reference number , he’s not liable to any cost
Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests