TIME FOR A LIMIT ON THREADS?

[Trapper John]

I don't know about anyone else, but I have always used the 'Active Topics' way to enter the discussions on the site, never used the 'Board Index' to single out a specific forum like the Arms, News or Snug - unless of course I'm wanting to create a thread, then I choose the appropriate one.

This has always worked for me and seems the obvious choice for anyone wanting to see whats going on currently. The only drawback is that some posters have a propensity to start an awful lot of threads.

Now far be it for me to decide what is an important or discussion worthy issue but some of them to my mind are an absolute load of shite.

Now using the 'active topics' option, every new thread created in any forum pushes the current threads down the list until they disappear to the next page, where they rarely see the light of day again.

For people who might not visit every day or even just once a day, decent topics might not get the airing they deserve because they've fallen off the page.

So I was wondering if posters should be limited to how many threads they can start in a period of time perhaps, or have on the active topics board at any one time? ...... I don't know but I do get the impression that just as some people like to hear the sound of their own voice, others like seeing their 'name' plastered on a screen.

Would you agree or not? and if so how would it be managed?

[Guest]

I don't know about anyone else, but I have always used the 'Active Topics' way to enter the discussions on the site, never used the 'Board Index' to single out a specific forum like the Arms, News or Snug - unless of course I'm wanting to create a thread, then I choose the appropriate one.

This has always worked for me and seems the obvious choice for anyone wanting to see whats going on currently. The only drawback is that some posters have a propensity to start an awful lot of threads.

Now far be it for me to decide what is an important or discussion worthy issue but some of them to my mind are an absolute load of shite.

Now using the 'active topics' option, every new thread created in any forum pushes the current threads down the list until they disappear to the next page, where they rarely see the light of day again.

For people who might not visit every day or even just once a day, decent topics might not get the airing they deserve because they've fallen off the page.

So I was wondering if posters should be limited to how many threads they can start in a period of time perhaps, or have on the active topics board at any one time? ...... I don't know but I do get the impression that just as some people like to hear the sound of their own voice, others like seeing their 'name' plastered on a screen.

Would you agree or not? and if so how would it be managed?

markey & starbold could have their own section ...

[Star]

I don't know about anyone else, but I have always used the 'Active Topics' way to enter the discussions on the site, never used the 'Board Index' to single out a specific forum like the Arms, News or Snug - unless of course I'm wanting to create a thread, then I choose the appropriate one.

This has always worked for me and seems the obvious choice for anyone wanting to see whats going on currently. The only drawback is that some posters have a propensity to start an awful lot of threads.

Now far be it for me to decide what is an important or discussion worthy issue but some of them to my mind are an absolute load of shite.

Now using the 'active topics' option, every new thread created in any forum pushes the current threads down the list until they disappear to the next page, where they rarely see the light of day again.

For people who might not visit every day or even just once a day, decent topics might not get the airing they deserve because they've fallen off the page.

So I was wondering if posters should be limited to how many threads they can start in a period of time perhaps, or have on the active topics board at any one time? ...... I don't know but I do get the impression that just as some people like to hear the sound of their own voice, others like seeing their 'name' plastered on a screen.

Would you agree or not? and if so how would it be managed?

markey & starbold could have their own section ...

That would work

[Trapper John]

I don't know about anyone else, but I have always used the 'Active Topics' way to enter the discussions on the site, never used the 'Board Index' to single out a specific forum like the Arms, News or Snug - unless of course I'm wanting to create a thread, then I choose the appropriate one.

This has always worked for me and seems the obvious choice for anyone wanting to see whats going on currently. The only drawback is that some posters have a propensity to start an awful lot of threads.

Now far be it for me to decide what is an important or discussion worthy issue but some of them to my mind are an absolute load of shite.

Now using the 'active topics' option, every new thread created in any forum pushes the current threads down the list until they disappear to the next page, where they rarely see the light of day again.

For people who might not visit every day or even just once a day, decent topics might not get the airing they deserve because they've fallen off the page.

So I was wondering if posters should be limited to how many threads they can start in a period of time perhaps, or have on the active topics board at any one time? ...... I don't know but I do get the impression that just as some people like to hear the sound of their own voice, others like seeing their 'name' plastered on a screen.

Would you agree or not? and if so how would it be managed?

markey & starbold could have their own section ...

You may be on to something there.

[Markey mark]

I don't know about anyone else, but I have always used the 'Active Topics' way to enter the discussions on the site, never used the 'Board Index' to single out a specific forum like the Arms, News or Snug - unless of course I'm wanting to create a thread, then I choose the appropriate one.

This has always worked for me and seems the obvious choice for anyone wanting to see whats going on currently. The only drawback is that some posters have a propensity to start an awful lot of threads.

Now far be it for me to decide what is an important or discussion worthy issue but some of them to my mind are an absolute load of shite.

Now using the 'active topics' option, every new thread created in any forum pushes the current threads down the list until they disappear to the next page, where they rarely see the light of day again.

For people who might not visit every day or even just once a day, decent topics might not get the airing they deserve because they've fallen off the page.

So I was wondering if posters should be limited to how many threads they can start in a period of time perhaps, or have on the active topics board at any one time? ...... I don't know but I do get the impression that just as some people like to hear the sound of their own voice, others like seeing their 'name' plastered on a screen.

Would you agree or not? and if so how would it be managed?

To be honest trapper John I agree with you ,I would like Point out I rather have a good debate and the shit that go on with threads , yes I put my arms up I’m guilty part, because it’s got to the stage nearly everyone just want to trolls,

[Trapper John]

I don't know about anyone else, but I have always used the 'Active Topics' way to enter the discussions on the site, never used the 'Board Index' to single out a specific forum like the Arms, News or Snug - unless of course I'm wanting to create a thread, then I choose the appropriate one.

This has always worked for me and seems the obvious choice for anyone wanting to see whats going on currently. The only drawback is that some posters have a propensity to start an awful lot of threads.

Now far be it for me to decide what is an important or discussion worthy issue but some of them to my mind are an absolute load of shite.

Now using the 'active topics' option, every new thread created in any forum pushes the current threads down the list until they disappear to the next page, where they rarely see the light of day again.

For people who might not visit every day or even just once a day, decent topics might not get the airing they deserve because they've fallen off the page.

So I was wondering if posters should be limited to how many threads they can start in a period of time perhaps, or have on the active topics board at any one time? ...... I don't know but I do get the impression that just as some people like to hear the sound of their own voice, others like seeing their 'name' plastered on a screen.

Would you agree or not? and if so how would it be managed?

To be honest trapper John I agree with you ,I would like Point out I rather have a good debate and the shit that go on with threads , yes I put my arms up I’m guilty part, because it’s got to the stage nearly everyone just want to trolls,

Yeah, I have noticed that too. I have to admit that sometimes I've thought 'please don't post in my thread Markey, it'll just turn into a trollfest'

[Trapper John]

Anyways I was thinking more about the Major than anyone else, he has the annoying habit of whacking out a half dozen threads a day, then fucking off without even waiting to see if he gets any response.

[Markey mark]

I don't know about anyone else, but I have always used the 'Active Topics' way to enter the discussions on the site, never used the 'Board Index' to single out a specific forum like the Arms, News or Snug - unless of course I'm wanting to create a thread, then I choose the appropriate one.

This has always worked for me and seems the obvious choice for anyone wanting to see whats going on currently. The only drawback is that some posters have a propensity to start an awful lot of threads.

Now far be it for me to decide what is an important or discussion worthy issue but some of them to my mind are an absolute load of shite.

Now using the 'active topics' option, every new thread created in any forum pushes the current threads down the list until they disappear to the next page, where they rarely see the light of day again.

For people who might not visit every day or even just once a day, decent topics might not get the airing they deserve because they've fallen off the page.

So I was wondering if posters should be limited to how many threads they can start in a period of time perhaps, or have on the active topics board at any one time? ...... I don't know but I do get the impression that just as some people like to hear the sound of their own voice, others like seeing their 'name' plastered on a screen.

Would you agree or not? and if so how would it be managed?

To be honest trapper John I agree with you ,I would like Point out I rather have a good debate and the shit that go on with threads , yes I put my arms up I’m guilty part, because it’s got to the stage nearly everyone just want to trolls,

Yeah, I have noticed that too. I have to admit that sometimes I've thought 'please don't post in my thread Markey, it'll just turn into a trollfest'

Funny enough you said that , Reasons I don’t hardly post on your threads, I know it’s just be trolled , there’s a few posters ike yourselves that whom I respect and would not your threads ruin , it’s not nice

[Vicky]

The easy answer is to start moving them to the crap thread section.

If someone starts so many threads and can't be bothered taking part in it, why should it remain in the Arms?

[Guest]

The easy answer is to start moving them to the crap thread section.

If someone starts so many threads and can't be bothered taking part in it, why should it remain in the Arms?

that takes care of starbold.

[Stooo]

You may be on to something there.

And it would bump to the top every time that it's posted in. Use 'view new posts' instead, it's a bit more current.

[Major]

I don't know about anyone else, but I have always used the 'Active Topics' way to enter the discussions on the site, never used the 'Board Index' to single out a specific forum like the Arms, News or Snug - unless of course I'm wanting to create a thread, then I choose the appropriate one.

This has always worked for me and seems the obvious choice for anyone wanting to see whats going on currently. The only drawback is that some posters have a propensity to start an awful lot of threads.

Now far be it for me to decide what is an important or discussion worthy issue but some of them to my mind are an absolute load of shite.

Now using the 'active topics' option, every new thread created in any forum pushes the current threads down the list until they disappear to the next page, where they rarely see the light of day again.

For people who might not visit every day or even just once a day, decent topics might not get the airing they deserve because they've fallen off the page.

So I was wondering if posters should be limited to how many threads they can start in a period of time perhaps, or have on the active topics board at any one time? ...... I don't know but I do get the impression that just as some people like to hear the sound of their own voice, others like seeing their 'name' plastered on a screen.

Would you agree or not? and if so how would it be managed?

markey & starbold could have their own section ...

TROLLED it immediately. Guest

[McAz]

I don't know about anyone else, but I have always used the 'Active Topics' way to enter the discussions on the site, never used the 'Board Index' to single out a specific forum like the Arms, News or Snug - unless of course I'm wanting to create a thread, then I choose the appropriate one.

This has always worked for me and seems the obvious choice for anyone wanting to see whats going on currently. The only drawback is that some posters have a propensity to start an awful lot of threads.

Now far be it for me to decide what is an important or discussion worthy issue but some of them to my mind are an absolute load of shite.

Now using the 'active topics' option, every new thread created in any forum pushes the current threads down the list until they disappear to the next page, where they rarely see the light of day again.

For people who might not visit every day or even just once a day, decent topics might not get the airing they deserve because they've fallen off the page.

So I was wondering if posters should be limited to how many threads they can start in a period of time perhaps, or have on the active topics board at any one time? ...... I don't know but I do get the impression that just as some people like to hear the sound of their own voice, others like seeing their 'name' plastered on a screen.

Would you agree or not? and if so how would it be managed?

markey & starbold could have their own section ...

TROLLED it immediately. Guest

Trolled what starbold?

[Major]

Anyways I was thinking more about the Major than anyone else, he has the annoying habit of whacking out a half dozen threads a day, then fucking off without even waiting to see if he gets any response.

I do eventually respond.

When I try for a debate which I feel others would like the regular forum trolls, McTurd and guest immediately troll, derail, destroy it so I think sod it and wander off but do come back and retaliate, surely you have seen that.
I would not retaliate if these pair of trolls behaved,

[McAz]

Anyways I was thinking more about the Major than anyone else, he has the annoying habit of whacking out a half dozen threads a day, then fucking off without even waiting to see if he gets any response.

I do eventually respond.

When I try for a debate which I feel others would like the regular forum trolls, McTurd and guest immediately troll, derail, destroy it so I think sod it and wander off but do come back and retaliate, surely you have seen that.
I would not retaliate if these pair of trolls behaved,

Very true starbold, I and others ask you questions which you never answer - too spineless to debate?