measurer wrote:No. For all of these reasons.
A new policy statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is likely to throw fuel on the fiery controversy surrounding male infant circumcision.
The AAP's statement touts the medical benefits of circumcision while stopping short of recommending the procedure, which opponents decry as painful and unnecessary. For instance, new research has found that circumcision lowers the risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, genital herpes, human papillomavirus and syphilis.
measurer wrote:No. For all of these reasons.
A new policy statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is likely to throw fuel on the fiery controversy surrounding male infant circumcision.
The AAP's statement touts the medical benefits of circumcision while stopping short of recommending the procedure, which opponents decry as painful and unnecessary. For instance, new research has found that circumcision lowers the risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, genital herpes, human papillomavirus and syphilis.
measurer wrote:Don't need to. Do you have to?
Big Fat Frosty wrote:measurer wrote:Don't need to. Do you have to?
its government sanctioned child mutilation
it has no place in any society i want to build...
measurer wrote:Slap them on the table boys - what's a wee bit lost skin when we ladies have to bear the pain if childhood !
Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests