DS thread # 92

Big Threads

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Dean » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:03 pm

Holly wrote:The word "womanliness" was never mentioned in Vam's post, ffs, stick to the facts you all. Having said that, move on now from this ridiculous conversation :brickwall:


It doesn’t upset Vam, she was joking about it a few pages back. Is this yet another topic about Vam that is out of bounds? I can’t keep up...
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 27143
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:05 pm

Dean wrote:
Kat wrote:Ok here goes .it was known that vam and myself didn't get along .but I hate this posting about her not having children it's very low in fact for a woman as insults go it's the lowest .canny please say sorry .I haven't a clue who any of the new posters are who's side i don't care can had had a lot of bad posts against her of late i know how it feels not good


To be fair, Vam uses it as much as anybody else does, for sympathy. I wouldn’t take any notice of her ‘hurt feelings’


no she doesn't cuntchops, who the fuck would want to use that in everyday forum bantz?
you're just diving in on any excuse to troll her. jra and numbertwat are to easy pickings for you, trolling her is something you can really put some welly into :hand:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby McAz » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:07 pm

Nucks wrote:
Avon Barksdale wrote:
Lambert wrote:Confucius he say
Those who stir shit
Must lick spoon


Confucius also say
Man who go through airport turnstile sideways
Bound to Bangkok


:gigglesnshit:

My favourite one as a kid

Man who fart in church
Must sit in own pew


An old fave:

Man concieved in automatic car
Bound to be a shiftless bastard
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 26925
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:57 am

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:08 pm

HobbitFeet wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:Visions of grandeur though
:pmsl:



he's such a nobber

but seriously I don't want to ban people, but you know - give an inch and all that


Yes you do. You've made more posts throwing your new-found weight around in about 2 weeks than holly, vicks and measurer made in about 4 years. You've literally ruined this thread.

It's like having your mam hanging round now telling you off every 5 minutes. FFS.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby MG2 » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:08 pm

Dean wrote:
Holly wrote:The word "womanliness" was never mentioned in Vam's post, ffs, stick to the facts you all. Having said that, move on now from this ridiculous conversation :brickwall:


It doesn’t upset Vam, she was joking about it a few pages back. Is this yet another topic about Vam that is out of bounds? I can’t keep up...


I doubt you have a clue if it upsets her or not, it's just another weapon in your petty little arsenal.
User avatar
MG2
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2018 9:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Dean » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:08 pm

Guest wrote:
Dean wrote:
Kat wrote:Ok here goes .it was known that vam and myself didn't get along .but I hate this posting about her not having children it's very low in fact for a woman as insults go it's the lowest .canny please say sorry .I haven't a clue who any of the new posters are who's side i don't care can had had a lot of bad posts against her of late i know how it feels not good


To be fair, Vam uses it as much as anybody else does, for sympathy. I wouldn’t take any notice of her ‘hurt feelings’


no she doesn't cuntchops, who the fuck would want to use that in everyday forum bantz?
you're just diving in on any excuse to troll her. jra and numbertwat are to easy pickings for you, trolling her is something you can really put some welly into :hand:


If you read back on this thread, you’ll see I’m correct.
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 27143
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Holly » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:09 pm

Dean wrote:
Holly wrote:The word "womanliness" was never mentioned in Vam's post, ffs, stick to the facts you all. Having said that, move on now from this ridiculous conversation :brickwall:


It doesn’t upset Vam, she was joking about it a few pages back. Is this yet another topic about Vam that is out of bounds? I can’t keep up...



No, it's about twisting posts, things that haven't actually been said. It's like fokn Chinese whispers :roll:
User avatar
Holly
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4781
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 4:25 pm
Location: Middle-earth

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Dean » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:09 pm

MG2 wrote:
Dean wrote:
Holly wrote:The word "womanliness" was never mentioned in Vam's post, ffs, stick to the facts you all. Having said that, move on now from this ridiculous conversation :brickwall:


It doesn’t upset Vam, she was joking about it a few pages back. Is this yet another topic about Vam that is out of bounds? I can’t keep up...


I doubt you have a clue if it upsets her or not, it's just another weapon in your petty little arsenal.


I’m just going by her own posts love...
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 27143
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Nucks » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:11 pm

McAz wrote:
Nucks wrote:
Avon Barksdale wrote:
Lambert wrote:Confucius he say
Those who stir shit
Must lick spoon


Confucius also say
Man who go through airport turnstile sideways
Bound to Bangkok


:gigglesnshit:

My favourite one as a kid

Man who fart in church
Must sit in own pew


An old fave:

Man concieved in automatic car
Bound to be a shiftless bastard


Safe to say Confucius was a cheeky git. :mrgreen:
User avatar
Nucks
 
Posts: 3596
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:59 am

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Dean » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:11 pm

Holly wrote:
Dean wrote:
Holly wrote:The word "womanliness" was never mentioned in Vam's post, ffs, stick to the facts you all. Having said that, move on now from this ridiculous conversation :brickwall:


It doesn’t upset Vam, she was joking about it a few pages back. Is this yet another topic about Vam that is out of bounds? I can’t keep up...



No, it's about twisting posts, things that haven't actually been said. It's like fokn Chinese whispers :roll:


And that really needs Admin intervention? Vam is a big girl, she’s more than happy to dish it so she should expect it back. Adding to the list of things she has had censored about herself only makes her look weak...
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 27143
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:12 pm

Isn't a miscarriage the loss of a child? Perhaps we should all be upping the ante and sneering at those who have lost children too like Canary does :shake head:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Jem » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:15 pm

Guest wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:Visions of grandeur though
:pmsl:



he's such a nobber

but seriously I don't want to ban people, but you know - give an inch and all that


Yes you do. You've made more posts throwing your new-found weight around in about 2 weeks than holly, vicks and measurer made in about 4 years. You've literally ruined this thread.

It's like having your mam hanging round now telling you off every 5 minutes. FFS.
Ruined the thread?
:pmsl:

I think she's brought a lot of humour and I'm happy she's a mod.
User avatar
Jem
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:04 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby HobbitFeet » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:17 pm

meh

water off a duck's back
User avatar
HobbitFeet
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:29 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:17 pm

Dean wrote:
Guest wrote:
Dean wrote:
Kat wrote:Ok here goes .it was known that vam and myself didn't get along .but I hate this posting about her not having children it's very low in fact for a woman as insults go it's the lowest .canny please say sorry .I haven't a clue who any of the new posters are who's side i don't care can had had a lot of bad posts against her of late i know how it feels not good


To be fair, Vam uses it as much as anybody else does, for sympathy. I wouldn’t take any notice of her ‘hurt feelings’


no she doesn't cuntchops, who the fuck would want to use that in everyday forum bantz?
you're just diving in on any excuse to troll her. jra and numbertwat are to easy pickings for you, trolling her is something you can really put some welly into :hand:


If you read back on this thread, you’ll see I’m correct.


I have read back and you're not correct, you're lying and twisting shit for the sake of it like a sad git :hand:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Dean » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:19 pm

Guest wrote:Isn't a miscarriage the loss of a child? Perhaps we should all be upping the ante and sneering at those who have lost children too like Canary does :shake head:


We? You’re just a cowardly guest...
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 27143
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:02 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests