DS thread # 92

Big Threads

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby McAz » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:19 pm

Guest wrote:Isn't a miscarriage the loss of a child? Perhaps we should all be upping the ante and sneering at those who have lost children too like Canary does :shake head:

As in my wife sleeps with multiple partners indulging in bumsex? Or my "terrorism" connections? Nothing was done about that. One rule for one...

If you can't take it on here then go elsewhere, simple. :thumbsup:
Last edited by McAz on Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 26925
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:57 am

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Dean » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:19 pm

Guest wrote:
Dean wrote:
Guest wrote:
Dean wrote:
Kat wrote:Ok here goes .it was known that vam and myself didn't get along .but I hate this posting about her not having children it's very low in fact for a woman as insults go it's the lowest .canny please say sorry .I haven't a clue who any of the new posters are who's side i don't care can had had a lot of bad posts against her of late i know how it feels not good


To be fair, Vam uses it as much as anybody else does, for sympathy. I wouldn’t take any notice of her ‘hurt feelings’


no she doesn't cuntchops, who the fuck would want to use that in everyday forum bantz?
you're just diving in on any excuse to troll her. jra and numbertwat are to easy pickings for you, trolling her is something you can really put some welly into :hand:


If you read back on this thread, you’ll see I’m correct.


I have read back and you're not correct, you're lying and twisting shit for the sake of it like a sad git :hand:


She is quite clearly laughing about it. It’s there in black and white.
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 27143
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Junglejayne » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:20 pm

Holly wrote:
Dean wrote:
Holly wrote:The word "womanliness" was never mentioned in Vam's post, ffs, stick to the facts you all. Having said that, move on now from this ridiculous conversation :brickwall:


It doesn’t upset Vam, she was joking about it a few pages back. Is this yet another topic about Vam that is out of bounds? I can’t keep up...



No, it's about twisting posts, things that haven't actually been said. It's like fokn Chinese whispers :roll:


That happens a lot, most of the time we just have field the guest posts and suck it up.
User avatar
Junglejayne
 
Posts: 2180
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2015 4:53 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby megaera » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:20 pm

It wasn't Vam who was annoyed by the post. Dunno why she is getting a hard time about it?
User avatar
megaera
 
Posts: 1287
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:04 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Dean » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:22 pm

megaera wrote:It wasn't Vam who was annoyed by the post. Dunno why she is getting a hard time about it?


Because she has used this numerous times in the past looking for sympathy. It’s an old worn out tactic that anyone with half a brain can see through...
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 27143
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:25 pm

Dean wrote:
Guest wrote:
Dean wrote:
Guest wrote:
Dean wrote:
To be fair, Vam uses it as much as anybody else does, for sympathy. I wouldn’t take any notice of her ‘hurt feelings’


no she doesn't cuntchops, who the fuck would want to use that in everyday forum bantz?
you're just diving in on any excuse to troll her. jra and numbertwat are to easy pickings for you, trolling her is something you can really put some welly into :hand:


If you read back on this thread, you’ll see I’m correct.


I have read back and you're not correct, you're lying and twisting shit for the sake of it like a sad git :hand:


She is quite clearly laughing about it. It’s there in black and white.


as a one off joke with a forum pal, not the same thing as you lying about her talking about it all the time you twisted fuck :dafinger:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Holly » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:27 pm

Dean wrote:
Holly wrote:
Dean wrote:
Holly wrote:The word "womanliness" was never mentioned in Vam's post, ffs, stick to the facts you all. Having said that, move on now from this ridiculous conversation :brickwall:


It doesn’t upset Vam, she was joking about it a few pages back. Is this yet another topic about Vam that is out of bounds? I can’t keep up...



No, it's about twisting posts, things that haven't actually been said. It's like fokn Chinese whispers :roll:


And that really needs Admin intervention? Vam is a big girl, she’s more than happy to dish it so she should expect it back. Adding to the list of things she has had censored about herself only makes her look weak...



Yes, because an endless debate about something that has never been said is pointless and ridiculous.
User avatar
Holly
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4781
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 4:25 pm
Location: Middle-earth

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby megaera » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:29 pm

Dean wrote:
megaera wrote:It wasn't Vam who was annoyed by the post. Dunno why she is getting a hard time about it?


Because she has used this numerous times in the past looking for sympathy. It’s an old worn out tactic that anyone with half a brain can see through...


Yeah, but what canary said wasnt a 'personal' insult, it was a sweeping comment that applied to more than just the intended target.
User avatar
megaera
 
Posts: 1287
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:04 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Dean » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:31 pm

megaera wrote:
Dean wrote:
megaera wrote:It wasn't Vam who was annoyed by the post. Dunno why she is getting a hard time about it?


Because she has used this numerous times in the past looking for sympathy. It’s an old worn out tactic that anyone with half a brain can see through...


Yeah, but what canary said wasnt a 'personal' insult, it was a sweeping comment that applied to more than just the intended target.


So feel free to address it.
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 27143
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Dean » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:32 pm

Holly wrote:
Dean wrote:
Holly wrote:
Dean wrote:
Holly wrote:The word "womanliness" was never mentioned in Vam's post, ffs, stick to the facts you all. Having said that, move on now from this ridiculous conversation :brickwall:


It doesn’t upset Vam, she was joking about it a few pages back. Is this yet another topic about Vam that is out of bounds? I can’t keep up...



No, it's about twisting posts, things that haven't actually been said. It's like fokn Chinese whispers :roll:


And that really needs Admin intervention? Vam is a big girl, she’s more than happy to dish it so she should expect it back. Adding to the list of things she has had censored about herself only makes her look weak...



Yes, because an endless debate about something that has never been said is pointless and ridiculous.


That happens here virtually every day. Why does it need intervention just because it happens to concern Vam today?
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 27143
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby McAz » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:33 pm

megaera wrote:
Dean wrote:
megaera wrote:It wasn't Vam who was annoyed by the post. Dunno why she is getting a hard time about it?


Because she has used this numerous times in the past looking for sympathy. It’s an old worn out tactic that anyone with half a brain can see through...


Yeah, but what canary said wasnt a 'personal' insult, it was a sweeping comment that applied to more than just the intended target.

Hmmm - from my reading the "womanliness" on both sides was being questioned. Though why that should require new rules here is beyond me.
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 26925
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:57 am

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby megaera » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:33 pm

Dean wrote:
megaera wrote:
Dean wrote:
megaera wrote:It wasn't Vam who was annoyed by the post. Dunno why she is getting a hard time about it?


Because she has used this numerous times in the past looking for sympathy. It’s an old worn out tactic that anyone with half a brain can see through...


Yeah, but what canary said wasnt a 'personal' insult, it was a sweeping comment that applied to more than just the intended target.


So feel free to address it.


I am...

As I said, it wasn't Vam that was annoyed by canary's post so I don't know why she is getting such a hard time about it.
User avatar
megaera
 
Posts: 1287
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:04 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Dean » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:34 pm

Guest wrote:as a one off joke with a forum pal, not the same thing as you lying about her talking about it all the time you twisted fuck :dafinger:


Where did I say she talks about it all the time?
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 27143
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby Dean » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:34 pm

megaera wrote:
Dean wrote:
megaera wrote:
Dean wrote:
megaera wrote:It wasn't Vam who was annoyed by the post. Dunno why she is getting a hard time about it?


Because she has used this numerous times in the past looking for sympathy. It’s an old worn out tactic that anyone with half a brain can see through...


Yeah, but what canary said wasnt a 'personal' insult, it was a sweeping comment that applied to more than just the intended target.


So feel free to address it.


I am...

As I said, it wasn't Vam that was annoyed by canary's post so I don't know why she is getting such a hard time about it.


And I explained why, for me anyway.
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 27143
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: DS thread # 92

Postby megaera » Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:36 pm

McAz wrote:
megaera wrote:
Dean wrote:
megaera wrote:It wasn't Vam who was annoyed by the post. Dunno why she is getting a hard time about it?


Because she has used this numerous times in the past looking for sympathy. It’s an old worn out tactic that anyone with half a brain can see through...


Yeah, but what canary said wasnt a 'personal' insult, it was a sweeping comment that applied to more than just the intended target.

Hmmm - from my reading the "womanliness" on both sides was being questioned. Though why that should require new rules here is beyond me.


I'm not asking for new rules, just saying that what canary said was hurtful to other people who are not involved in their spat.
User avatar
megaera
 
Posts: 1287
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:04 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests