Dogs New Rules

A right load of bollocks...

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Holly » Sun May 06, 2018 11:17 pm

Claire wrote:I need Holly to help me though. We both created and administered the old one. Holly?



Hi Claire :Hiya:

Looks like the Quiz is all sorted!

It is really great to see you posting again, it's been a long time. I'm getting all nostalgic now, it's so good to see some of the old regulars back :wubbers:
User avatar
Holly
Site Admin
 
Posts: 15809
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 3:25 pm

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Keyser » Sun May 06, 2018 11:58 pm

MG2 wrote:Fluffy absolutely could bite and bite back but having spent a lot of time chatting to her I did find her to be an intelligent and rather sweet lady with many issues that explained certain behaviours that irked so many.

I hope she is happy and well.


I talked to he a lot before she was banned on DS and don't recognise the person that others are describing.

She was an intelligent girl and very friendly - I hope she is well because she did have problems.
User avatar
Keyser
 
Posts: 12710
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:25 pm

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Guest » Mon May 07, 2018 12:28 am

Keyser wrote:
MG2 wrote:Fluffy absolutely could bite and bite back but having spent a lot of time chatting to her I did find her to be an intelligent and rather sweet lady with many issues that explained certain behaviours that irked so many.

I hope she is happy and well.


I talked to he a lot before she was banned on DS and don't recognise the person that others are describing.

She was an intelligent girl and very friendly - I hope she is well because she did have problems.


Of course you did

Image

:gigglesnshit:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Keyser » Mon May 07, 2018 12:37 am

Guest wrote:
Keyser wrote:
MG2 wrote:Fluffy absolutely could bite and bite back but having spent a lot of time chatting to her I did find her to be an intelligent and rather sweet lady with many issues that explained certain behaviours that irked so many.

I hope she is happy and well.


I talked to he a lot before she was banned on DS and don't recognise the person that others are describing.

She was an intelligent girl and very friendly - I hope she is well because she did have problems.


Of course you did

Image

:gigglesnshit:


How original - I knew even mentioning that would get a sarcy remark - oh and by the way the image does not work. :snooty:
User avatar
Keyser
 
Posts: 12710
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:25 pm

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Guest » Mon May 07, 2018 12:41 am

Lighten up Keys, t'was only for a bit of fun :awesome:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Keyser » Mon May 07, 2018 12:44 am

Guest wrote:Lighten up Keys, t'was only for a bit of fun :awesome:


Sorry my bad! :mrgreen:
User avatar
Keyser
 
Posts: 12710
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:25 pm

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Trapper John » Mon May 07, 2018 5:06 am

NastyNickers wrote:
Claire wrote:
Big Fat Frosty wrote:so claire you have no objection to stoo unbanning fluffy...
:dunno:

None whatsoever.

But I'm not admin and tbh she would really need to apologise big time to Vicks. What she did to her was completely mental.


I’ve heard stories about Fluffy and they all sound hilarious, except the horrible shit she did to Vicks. I do wish I’d been around for it though, definitely feel like I missed out on an arsehole :mrgreen:


You'd have liked her, she didn't like me so common ground right from the off.

To be fair to her though she did involve herself in other threads from time to time on here, she wasn't just a troll and WUM .

Don't know about what happened after she left here, some followed her around and reported in, I didn't have any interest in that.
User avatar
Trapper John
Gunner.
 
Posts: 35974
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:36 am
Location: Champions league next season - prediction date: 10/5/2018

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Holly » Mon May 07, 2018 5:18 am

OK,enough of the Fluffy talk, she went OTT with shit talk over on BF about Dog members and Admin, and what she did with Vicky's pic and posting it on her porn site was totally unacceptable, so nope, she won't be invited back, that's all.

Oh and to all the posters who say ...but she was OK with me, she was lovely and friendly blah blah blah...( usually blokes ) does it make it OK what she did to posters she wasn't friendly with? Does it mean just because she was OK with "YOU" no one else matters? :dunno:
User avatar
Holly
Site Admin
 
Posts: 15809
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 3:25 pm

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Vicky » Mon May 07, 2018 5:30 am

A pair of big tits and men start gibbering.

"She was okay with me" "I didn't have any interest in that"

:hand:
User avatar
Vicky
 
Posts: 68337
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:26 pm

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby jra » Mon May 07, 2018 5:46 am

NastyNickers wrote:The trick is to bribe to mods.
Chocolate and flowers are a good start.

:choc:


Will a box of chocolate starfish do?
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 18197
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:02 pm

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Trapper John » Mon May 07, 2018 5:48 am

Vicks wrote:A pair of big tits and men start gibbering.

"She was okay with me" "I didn't have any interest in that"

:hand:


Excuse me, I hope that wasn't directed at me - seeing as you quoted part of my post. :snooty:
User avatar
Trapper John
Gunner.
 
Posts: 35974
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:36 am
Location: Champions league next season - prediction date: 10/5/2018

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Holly » Mon May 07, 2018 5:58 am

Trapper John wrote:
Vicks wrote:A pair of big tits and men start gibbering.

"She was okay with me" "I didn't have any interest in that"

:hand:


Excuse me, I hope that wasn't directed at me - seeing as you quoted part of my post. :snooty:



I don't think Vicks meant you...You were one of the few blokes back then with your brain in the right place :gigglesnshit:
User avatar
Holly
Site Admin
 
Posts: 15809
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 3:25 pm

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Vicky » Mon May 07, 2018 6:01 am

Trapper John wrote:
Vicks wrote:A pair of big tits and men start gibbering.

"She was okay with me" "I didn't have any interest in that"

:hand:


Excuse me, I hope that wasn't directed at me - seeing as you quoted part of my post. :snooty:


Yes it was directed at you.

Someone shakes a pair of Spaniels Lugs at you and you suddenly have amnesia.

:dafinger:
User avatar
Vicky
 
Posts: 68337
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:26 pm

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Holly » Mon May 07, 2018 6:05 am

Holly wrote:
Trapper John wrote:
Vicks wrote:A pair of big tits and men start gibbering.

"She was okay with me" "I didn't have any interest in that"

:hand:


Excuse me, I hope that wasn't directed at me - seeing as you quoted part of my post. :snooty:



I don't think Vicks meant you...You were one of the few blokes back then with your brain in the right place :gigglesnshit:



Oops :mrgreen:
User avatar
Holly
Site Admin
 
Posts: 15809
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 3:25 pm

Re: Dogs New Rules

Postby Trapper John » Mon May 07, 2018 6:19 am

Vicks wrote:
Trapper John wrote:
Vicks wrote:A pair of big tits and men start gibbering.

"She was okay with me" "I didn't have any interest in that"

:hand:


Excuse me, I hope that wasn't directed at me - seeing as you quoted part of my post. :snooty:


Yes it was directed at you.

Someone shakes a pair of Spaniels Lugs at you and you suddenly have amnesia.

:dafinger:


Your memory of events decieves you, not for the first time I might add. You won't find my IP in the records of visitors to her porn site or following any links. :thumbsup:
User avatar
Trapper John
Gunner.
 
Posts: 35974
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:36 am
Location: Champions league next season - prediction date: 10/5/2018

PreviousNext

Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests