The Royal Wedding

A right load of bollocks...

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Jem » Sun May 20, 2018 11:26 pm

jra wrote:I might have some of this recorded. Harry is only a catch because he's well loaded, tbh.

Quasimodo could pull if they were driving around in a huge mansion and lived in a expensive Ferrari.

It's not always about money. Meghan has plenty of her own.
User avatar
Jem
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:04 pm

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Rockstar » Sun May 20, 2018 11:27 pm

McAz wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:
McAz wrote:
NastyNickers wrote:She’s very fit, very little body fat but not too much muscle bulk either. She’s got an athletic shape, which will come from years of her doing yoga. She’ll be incredibly strong.

She’s gorgeous.
The dress was beautiful.


Hmmm - from a purely sex-object (male) pov - she's just above average. The Middleton girls are more shaggable.


I dunno. I prefer Meghan I think. Kate is beautiful, but in a different kind of way.


Yeah, down to taste, I guess.


When did you get a taste? :ooer:
User avatar
Rockstar
 
Posts: 13236
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:40 pm

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Dimples » Sun May 20, 2018 11:40 pm

measurer wrote:: :again?:


:pmsl:
User avatar
Dimples
 
Posts: 13551
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:59 pm
Location: Under his eye

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Guest » Mon May 21, 2018 12:18 am

measurer wrote:: :again?:


There's a fair few posters on DS who fit that description to a T. :fatcow:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Guest » Mon May 21, 2018 12:25 am

Jem wrote:
jra wrote:I might have some of this recorded. Harry is only a catch because he's well loaded, tbh.

Quasimodo could pull if they were driving around in a huge mansion and lived in a expensive Ferrari.

It's not always about money. Meghan has plenty of her own.


That is JRA you're talking too - he thinks all women can be bought for a price. :hand:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby jra » Mon May 21, 2018 12:47 am

Guest wrote:
Jem wrote:
jra wrote:I might have some of this recorded. Harry is only a catch because he's well loaded, tbh.

Quasimodo could pull if they were driving around in a huge mansion and lived in a expensive Ferrari.

It's not always about money. Meghan has plenty of her own.


That is JRA you're talking too - he thinks all women can be bought for a price. :hand:


As if that hasn't been said for a thousand million times already. Yeah, I get it, you don't agree. Move on. Change the fucking record. It's shit numbingly boring, listening to parrots repeating the same troll bollocks for years. I made an off the cuff comment based on the film Indecent Exposure and I'll never hear the fucking last of it until I die because of losers like you. Forgive and forget, let bygones be bygones and all that.

Now piss off and leave me alone.

And you might learn the difference in spelling between two, to and too. It's to in this case dumbass.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 18197
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:02 pm

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby jra » Mon May 21, 2018 12:56 am

Jem wrote:
jra wrote:I might have some of this recorded. Harry is only a catch because he's well loaded, tbh.

Quasimodo could pull if they were driving around in a huge mansion and lived in a expensive Ferrari.

It's not always about money. Meghan has plenty of her own.


I wasn't talking just about Megan. She was the one he settled for. It's not like he's a Hitler dressing virgin before he met Megan and has got his tackle out at a public party. He's a royal and supposed to set some standards somewhere along the way.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 18197
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:02 pm

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Jem » Mon May 21, 2018 1:58 am

jra wrote:
Jem wrote:
jra wrote:I might have some of this recorded. Harry is only a catch because he's well loaded, tbh.

Quasimodo could pull if they were driving around in a huge mansion and lived in a expensive Ferrari.

It's not always about money. Meghan has plenty of her own.


I wasn't talking just about Megan. She was the one he settled for. It's not like he's a Hitler dressing virgin before he met Megan and has got his tackle out at a public party. He's a royal and supposed to set some standards somewhere along the way.

Ok.

It's not always about money, full stop.
User avatar
Jem
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:04 pm

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Vicky » Mon May 21, 2018 5:01 pm

4C80E9E200000578-5753387-image-a-21_1526911277517.jpg


One of three official photos that were released today.
User avatar
Vicky
 
Posts: 68337
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:26 pm

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Nucks » Mon May 21, 2018 5:41 pm

Vicks wrote:
4C80E9E200000578-5753387-image-a-21_1526911277517.jpg


One of three official photos that were released today.


What’s your take on the Scottish barometer of the royal family in general? Or does it vary a lot from region to region?
User avatar
Nucks
 
Posts: 9032
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:59 am
Location: Behind the curtains

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Keyser » Mon May 21, 2018 8:29 pm

For all you fans of the Royal Wedding you should have watched EE tonight.

It was 27 minutes of blatant establishment propaganda and one minute of drama at the end.

:Lucia:
User avatar
Keyser
 
Posts: 12710
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:25 pm

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Lady Murasaki » Mon May 21, 2018 8:33 pm

What kind of idiot watches EE?

:gigglesnshit:

Meghan at 15 outside Bucks.

Image
User avatar
Lady Murasaki
 
Posts: 37246
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:46 pm

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Guest » Mon May 21, 2018 8:39 pm

Keyser wrote:For all you fans of the Royal Wedding you should have watched EE tonight.

It was 27 minutes of blatant establishment propaganda and one minute of drama at the end.

:Lucia:


That's why it's gone down in the ratings...Mostly boring as fuck since they let the Tory script writers in.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Holly » Tue May 22, 2018 12:16 am

Lady Murasaki wrote:What kind of idiot watches EE?

:gigglesnshit:



I'm one of those kinds :snooty:

I like EE!
User avatar
Holly
Site Admin
 
Posts: 15666
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 3:25 pm

Re: The Royal Wedding

Postby Rolluplostinspace » Tue May 22, 2018 12:57 am

Never thought I'd say this but I enjoyed watching the wedding. Especially the preacher who the establishment will never have seen the likes of before on their turf.
What the hell he was on about when he left love and started passionately going on about fire being one of mans best achievements and how it enabled us to do this that and the other I have no idea and by the looks on the faces of those there neither did they.
Charley and Will were on the verge of giggling fits.
Straight after him there was a gospel style bit of singing which was brilliant .... again not something our establishment are used to at all.
Very entertaining indeed.
User avatar
Rolluplostinspace
 
Posts: 18686
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:12 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests