Should anything be off limits?

[Norman Lamont]

The topic of badgers should be off limits. They’re dangerous.

Also wolverines.

Except the X-Men guy.

I agree, all badgers should be off limits.

[Gabby]

Business as usual then!

[Dean]

Business as usual then!

I’m trying to be nice but certain people are determined to cause arguments on here...

[Gabby]

Business as usual then!

I’m trying to be nice but certain people are determined to cause arguments on here...

Hmmm.... have you pissed Rocky off?

[Dean]

Business as usual then!

I’m trying to be nice but certain people are determined to cause arguments on here...

Hmmm.... have you pissed Rocky off?

Not that I’m aware of. I think he’s bored because it’s pleasant on here lately.

[Rockstar]

Business as usual then!

I’m trying to be nice but certain people are determined to cause arguments on here...

Hmmm.... have you pissed Rocky off?

Not that I’m aware of. I think he’s bored because it’s pleasant on here lately.

Is this how you imagine posting in nice thread means...

[Nucks]

The topic of badgers should be off limits. They’re dangerous.

Also wolverines.

Except the X-Men guy.

I agree, all badgers should be off limits.

Ok, but let’s not mention badgers again.

[dis]

The topic of badgers should be off limits. They’re dangerous.

Also wolverines.

Except the X-Men guy.

I agree, all badgers should be off limits.

Ok, but let’s not mention badgers again.

Badgers, badgers..we don’t need no stinking badgers.

[Dimples]

[Punk]

The topic of badgers should be off limits. They’re dangerous.

Also wolverines.

Except the X-Men guy.

I agree, all badgers should be off limits.

Ok, but let’s not mention badgers again.

Badgers, badgers..we don’t need no stinking badgers.

That Mel Brooks has a lot to answer for.

[Nucks]

Off limits!!!

[BUDGIE]

What topics of conversation should be off limits?
We all know that posters like Dean and Budgie like to post for shock value, so they make the most offensive posts and literally try to out shock each other, which ultimately is very childish and boring.

On the sensible side of the argument though is the question.

What should be considered too offensive or are all bets off and it's everyone for themselves, so in other words where do you draw the line, but having said that the buck has to stop with Stooo as site owner, or should posters be responsible for what they post.

To be fair, I was a lot more offensive 6 years ago....

I haven't even mentioned Thalidomide deformities, which enraged plenty back then... only reason I don't now is because of Sturgeon's government which took someone to court for training his dog to do a Nazi salute....

I'm pro-Independence but the SNP are quite the little Hitlers at times....

Seems to me that you, as a guest, want to control what members do on here. Why not log in and we can discuss....

[Guest]

What topics of conversation should be off limits?
We all know that posters like Dean and Budgie like to post for shock value, so they make the most offensive posts and literally try to out shock each other, which ultimately is very childish and boring.

On the sensible side of the argument though is the question.

What should be considered too offensive or are all bets off and it's everyone for themselves, so in other words where do you draw the line, but having said that the buck has to stop with Stooo as site owner, or should posters be responsible for what they post.

To be fair, I was a lot more offensive 6 years ago....

I haven't even mentioned Thalidomide deformities, which enraged plenty back then... only reason I don't now is because of Sturgeon's government which took someone to court for training his dog to do a Nazi salute....

I'm pro-Independence but the SNP are quite the little Hitlers at times....

Seems to me that you, as a guest, want to control what members do on here. Why not log in and we can discuss....

I'm quite happy posting as a guest thanks.

So seeing as your friend Dean doesn't have the balls to answer the question maybe you do Budgie.

So why do you feel the need to be as offensive as possible?

Is it for shock value, and if so why or just why anyway?

[Punk]

What topics of conversation should be off limits?
We all know that posters like Dean and Budgie like to post for shock value, so they make the most offensive posts and literally try to out shock each other, which ultimately is very childish and boring.

On the sensible side of the argument though is the question.

What should be considered too offensive or are all bets off and it's everyone for themselves, so in other words where do you draw the line, but having said that the buck has to stop with Stooo as site owner, or should posters be responsible for what they post.

To be fair, I was a lot more offensive 6 years ago....

I haven't even mentioned Thalidomide deformities, which enraged plenty back then... only reason I don't now is because of Sturgeon's government which took someone to court for training his dog to do a Nazi salute....

I'm pro-Independence but the SNP are quite the little Hitlers at times....

Seems to me that you, as a guest, want to control what members do on here. Why not log in and we can discuss....

I'm quite happy posting as a guest thanks.

So seeing as your friend Dean doesn't have the balls to answer the question maybe you do Budgie.

So why do you feel the need to be as offensive as possible?

Is it for shock value, and if so why or just why anyway?

I imagine that lots of it is for the shock reaction or playing to the audience. If people want to bite then that is up to them, they can hardly bleat ooo he made me bite, can they? Some people start threads KNOWING that they will be trolled mercilessly then play the victim, what is your opinion on why they do that?

[Rockstar]

What topics of conversation should be off limits?
We all know that posters like Dean and Budgie like to post for shock value, so they make the most offensive posts and literally try to out shock each other, which ultimately is very childish and boring.

On the sensible side of the argument though is the question.

What should be considered too offensive or are all bets off and it's everyone for themselves, so in other words where do you draw the line, but having said that the buck has to stop with Stooo as site owner, or should posters be responsible for what they post.

To be fair, I was a lot more offensive 6 years ago....

I haven't even mentioned Thalidomide deformities, which enraged plenty back then... only reason I don't now is because of Sturgeon's government which took someone to court for training his dog to do a Nazi salute....

I'm pro-Independence but the SNP are quite the little Hitlers at times....

Seems to me that you, as a guest, want to control what members do on here. Why not log in and we can discuss....

I'm quite happy posting as a guest thanks.

So seeing as your friend Dean doesn't have the balls to answer the question maybe you do Budgie.

So why do you feel the need to be as offensive as possible?

Is it for shock value, and if so why or just why anyway?

I imagine that lots of it is for the shock reaction or playing to the audience. If people want to bite then that is up to them, they can hardly bleat ooo he made me bite, can they? Some people start threads KNOWING that they will be trolled mercilessly then play the victim, what is your opinion on why they do that?

Come to think of it,anything can be excused..Just gotta say "doing it for shock value" after the fact.