Stooo wrote:Fletch wrote:The problem with this technology is that very little in the way of warning will be given, believed or even investigated. The big corporates are driving the narrative and very little funding is available to investigate. What limited investigations are done are then ridiculed as conspiracy theories, as usual. You won't see the big corps give any warnings, or the corporate msm, just look at cigarettes if in doubt.
Because something is not said by the msm and big business, or even denied, doesn't mean there's not risk. They do it to make money, care and consideration of the many comes a lowly second. I've heard some/read some warnings about 5G and some effects sound pretty dangerous to me. Didn't some US embassy officials suffer harm from some sort of frequency transmission in Cuba and China? Wasn't that treated as serious intent to harm by the west? Hmm
Would cigarettes be approved today as a new product?
Yes, because money and the corporate propaganda exists to back a narrative. Being new it wouldn't have the track record of harm to base any opinion on.
Even if there were the track records of harm they would still be approved. The US would go on about 'freedoms' and the capitalist club would say people have the right to decide. The only thing that would change is possibly forcing any user to take out private medical insurance. Yet another earner for the few.
White Phosphorus, various nasty munitions and biological weapons are still made.
