Rolluplostinspace wrote:Banksy artwork shreds itself after £1m sale at Sotheby's
Is the work of art now worth even more or is it trash?
When I saw this o the news this morning I thought .... genious.
The art world have been thrown into confusion.
This guy hates the art world.
Who is responsible for the damage ... the auction room as it was still in their care?
Will the buyer want his money back or see he has invested in something that has stirred the art world globally like never before?
Is someone even now offering the buyer five million dollars?
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Banksy artwork shreds itself after £1m sale at Sotheby's
Is the work of art now worth even more or is it trash?
When I saw this o the news this morning I thought .... genious.
The art world have been thrown into confusion.
This guy hates the art world.
Who is responsible for the damage ... the auction room as it was still in their care?
Will the buyer want his money back or see he has invested in something that has stirred the art world globally like never before?
Is someone even now offering the buyer five million dollars?
This guy hates the art world.
Lady Murasaki wrote:What do you mean shreds itself?
Did Banksy shred it?
xtras1 wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:What do you mean shreds itself?
Did Banksy shred it?
Read my link
Lady Murasaki wrote:xtras1 wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:What do you mean shreds itself?
Did Banksy shred it?
Read my link
Oh ha, missed that. Excellent story and a brilliant idea. Owning a Banksy just seems wrong.
Dean wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:xtras1 wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:What do you mean shreds itself?
Did Banksy shred it?
Read my link
Oh ha, missed that. Excellent story and a brilliant idea. Owning a Banksy just seems wrong.
Indeed. Only chavs own the prints... like owning a fake Gucci handbag. Very tacky...
Dean wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:xtras1 wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:What do you mean shreds itself?
Did Banksy shred it?
Read my link
Oh ha, missed that. Excellent story and a brilliant idea. Owning a Banksy just seems wrong.
Indeed. Only chavs own the prints... like owning a fake Gucci handbag. Very tacky...
Dean wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:xtras1 wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:What do you mean shreds itself?
Did Banksy shred it?
Read my link
Oh ha, missed that. Excellent story and a brilliant idea. Owning a Banksy just seems wrong.
Indeed. Only chavs own the prints... like owning a fake Gucci handbag. Very tacky...
Stooo wrote:Dean wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:xtras1 wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:What do you mean shreds itself?
Did Banksy shred it?
Read my link
Oh ha, missed that. Excellent story and a brilliant idea. Owning a Banksy just seems wrong.
Indeed. Only chavs own the prints... like owning a fake Gucci handbag. Very tacky...
It's only chavy if you try to pass it off as an original. I carry a print of Hopper's 'Nighthawks at the Diner' in my wallet because I like to look at it sometimes, I can't see how this diminishes my appreciation of the painting
Stooo wrote:Dean wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:xtras1 wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:What do you mean shreds itself?
Did Banksy shred it?
Read my link
Oh ha, missed that. Excellent story and a brilliant idea. Owning a Banksy just seems wrong.
Indeed. Only chavs own the prints... like owning a fake Gucci handbag. Very tacky...
It's only chavy if you try to pass it off as an original. I carry a print of Hopper's 'Nighthawks at the Diner' in my wallet because I like to look at it sometimes, I can't see how this diminishes my appreciation of the painting
Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests