NastyNickers wrote:jra wrote:Richie BowWow wrote:touchy-feely wrote:
We've been through this before. Your actions as you described them were aimed at a stranger, touching and refusal to stop despite being told to several times, along with telling the victim she was attractive, amounted to assault (touching any part of the body which is unwanted and distressing) with an underlying sexual motive. It's what got you banned wasn't it?
Anyway, you've already said you don't mean what you say on here, so nothing coming from you can be taken at face value.
No when it come to sexual assault it very much matters which part of the body is touched,
if you touched someone's arm it wouldn't be sexual assault would it?Unless you touched it with your penis.
Not rocket science is it.
Fuck's sake. This incident happened probably about 2+ years ago and I've got a shit load of grief about it. I'm the only one who was assaulted and I was verbally abused, but because I'm a man I'm the one in the wrong. Now you know why I've paid for female company, because I don't wan't all the crap that comes with bad attitude women you see all around these days.
You’re in the wrong because you couldn’t take no for an answer.
No means no.
Note to self. Why am I having to explain this for the millionth time. Are people hoping the story will change like history does over the centuries. It feels like people have been scrutinizing every detail for centuries.
Way to go NN with taking the women's side, even though I was assaulted. That still doesn't justified being assaulted after I thought it was all over anyway. It was her friend who verbally abused me and I said I want to talk to your friend, not you. Rinse and repeat once or twice.
NN. I don't think it really matters what I write, you'll still think I was in the wrong, even though I could have had the women arrested, but me being me didn't think it was that big a deal, unlike some people on here that want dine out on it for years.
Anyone would think I'd murdered a few people.