Looks like they've had a change of heart after all
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... bours.html
Frankly wrote::mrgreen: Looks like they've had a change of heart after all
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... bours.html
McHenry wrote:Frankly wrote::mrgreen: Looks like they've had a change of heart after all
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... bours.html
Good news - thanks.
Frankly wrote::mrgreen: Looks like they've had a change of heart after all
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... bours.html
Frankly wrote::mrgreen: Looks like they've had a change of heart after all
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... bours.html
Frankly wrote::mrgreen: Looks like they've had a change of heart after all
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... bours.html
Vam wrote:HobbitFeet wrote:I saw Fletch had posted something similar in the random thread but there was so much going on that it got overlooked
it's a disgrace, nothing less than apartheid based on social class
I tried to find a positive spin, like maybe there is less social housing so they need less outdoor space (proportionally) but even if that is the case how can you justify that sort of segregation
You can't.
"Come here, my dear child. It's time for you to start learning about status and populism"
jra wrote:Middens wrote:They're claiming it's because the social housing tenants "don't contribute" to the upkeep. That seems quite petty as the development would not even have happened without the social housing. The local authority should have insisted on either proper access when the plans were being approved or agreed to pay a little from the rent they get from their tenants towards it as I bet the rents aren't that cheap either.
Just reminds me of 'gated areas' you get in the States.
xtras1 wrote:Frankly wrote::mrgreen: Looks like they've had a change of heart after all
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... bours.html
You know it's really great things have turned out this way.. I do hope it's for the best.
Not generalising here, but I hope they don't have problems with the feral little shits that congregate at night. Lighting bins, smoking weed leaving rubbish.. or is that just Hackney
Rolluplostinspace wrote:xtras1 wrote:Frankly wrote::mrgreen: Looks like they've had a change of heart after all
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... bours.html
You know it's really great things have turned out this way.. I do hope it's for the best.
Not generalising here, but I hope they don't have problems with the feral little shits that congregate at night. Lighting bins, smoking weed leaving rubbish.. or is that just Hackney
Most illegal drug use is by the middle classes.
Most financing for drug smuggling comes from the middle classes.
Most drug dealing is by the middle classes so lets hope those snotty little middle class little shits that congregate at night give the poorer kids some weed instead of selling it to them.
Guest wrote:Vam wrote:HobbitFeet wrote:I saw Fletch had posted something similar in the random thread but there was so much going on that it got overlooked
it's a disgrace, nothing less than apartheid based on social class
I tried to find a positive spin, like maybe there is less social housing so they need less outdoor space (proportionally) but even if that is the case how can you justify that sort of segregation
You can't.
"Come here, my dear child. It's time for you to start learning about status and populism"
I bet there's not many poor kids playing next to your house either
Frankly wrote:McHenry wrote:Frankly wrote::mrgreen: Looks like they've had a change of heart after all
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... bours.html
Good news - thanks.
Too right - Shame on them.
Vam wrote:Frankly wrote:McHenry wrote:Frankly wrote::mrgreen: Looks like they've had a change of heart after all
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... bours.html
Good news - thanks.
Too right - Shame on them.
The developers must have realised what a PR disaster this elitist punitive crap has been - so, back to the drawing board!
xtras1 wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:xtras1 wrote:Frankly wrote::mrgreen: Looks like they've had a change of heart after all
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... bours.html
You know it's really great things have turned out this way.. I do hope it's for the best.
Not generalising here, but I hope they don't have problems with the feral little shits that congregate at night. Lighting bins, smoking weed leaving rubbish.. or is that just Hackney
Most illegal drug use is by the middle classes.
Most financing for drug smuggling comes from the middle classes.
Most drug dealing is by the middle classes so lets hope those snotty little middle class little shits that congregate at night give the poorer kids some weed instead of selling it to them.
Not from what I'm seeing... most of the customers are snotty nose little shits, whilst the dealers are feral little shits ..
Return to The Sleeping Dogs' Arms
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests