sockseverywhere wrote:The difference between JK Rowling and all the other works mentioned - that people arent losing their shit over - is that JK upset the trans rights activists when their demands started to come into conflict with her strong advocacy of womens rights.
Long before this JK always got up my nose as being just another woke prick but this was fascinating.
A Woke vs Woke showdown. Woke Top Trumps whose rights are more important those of the feminist or the trans?
No one really walked away a winner from that spat but naturally all the extremists now had their sights trained on her.
Every thing she does and says will now be poured over to find some shade to throw at her.
They think they have it in her latest novel featuring a cross-dressing murderer but most people I know think they have fuck all and are acting like desperate idiots.
Im not even sure extremists is the right word for people sending her death threats and bitching to her publishers that seems more like terrorism to me.
They want her to die and/or lose her career because she has the "wrong" opinion about something in their ideology.
I don't understand what's so bad about having a crossdressing serial killer.
Surely the idea of equality is that everyone is equal, and a crossdresser is just as likely to be characterised as a 'baddie' in a book as anyone else is.
In any case, a lot of real life serial killers tend to have 'quirks', and like it or not, crossdressing is generally seen as being quirkish, so portraying them that way in a book is fair game.
There have been quite a few crossdressing/trans murderers in books and movies - Psycho and Dressed to Kill are two that come to mind.