Pat wrote:pinch of salt wrote:Pat wrote:Bella says she wasn't being serious, so there you go.
can't believe a word bella says
she did use to be shine's lackey
just saying
I don't care TBH.
So you posted why?
Pat wrote:pinch of salt wrote:Pat wrote:Bella says she wasn't being serious, so there you go.
can't believe a word bella says
she did use to be shine's lackey
just saying
I don't care TBH.
curious wrote:Pat wrote:pinch of salt wrote:Pat wrote:Bella says she wasn't being serious, so there you go.
can't believe a word bella says
she did use to be shine's lackey
just saying
I don't care TBH.
So you posted why?
Pat wrote:curious wrote:Pat wrote:pinch of salt wrote:Pat wrote:Bella says she wasn't being serious, so there you go.
can't believe a word bella says
she did use to be shine's lackey
just saying
I don't care TBH.
So you posted why?
I don't care she was Shine's lacky, pardon me for breathing.
Irene E. wrote:Canary wrote:Guest wrote:Canary wrote:Guest wrote:
What are you banging on about now? Nobody mentioned big or mysterious terms. I'm talking about levels of comprehension of plain English.
You can descend to the level of the barely educated if you like but some people prefer to communicate with like-minded intelligent individuals.
What on earth do Prince Charles or the GMC have to do with any of this?
You're going off at so many tangents now that you're making no sense at all?
It's a pity you mistake a preference for intelligent debate for snobbery... but not entirely a surprise, based on what I've seen of your posting style. You seem to have a colossal inferiority complex as well as an overactive imagination... and if anybody is getting worked up, it appears to be you - as you clutch as increasingly fragile straws.
I simply gave 2 examples of people who are extremely well (& expensively) educated who had dumbed down. Doctors & royalty.
The point being that if they can dumb down, then ..... so can you.
I've no inferiority complex whatsoever, take my word for it.
Look, I can see there's not going to be a meeting of minds here, which is fair enough. So I bid you good night.
I don't "dumb down" for anyone - particularly not lazy people.
You're right. There can be no meeting of minds as you are not bright enough to even see what the problem is.
Me & you were discussing dumbing down, so I gave you 2 very good examples of groups/institutions which have dumbed down.
And you accused me of going off topic. So ..... giving you 2 examples, to back up my argument, is going "off-topic", is it.
Yet here you are, full of insults & abuse , which have nowt to do with the subject.
If that's not going off topic, I dunno what is.
The funniest part is that you insisted you were not getting worked up.
Gosh i'd hate to see your insults when you get angry.
And insults are a sign that the argument is lost.
So really, every time you insult QC or Dean or Poca or NAA or indeed anyone else you have fallen foul of, you simply demonstrate that you have lost the argument.
...
Pat not logged in wrote:Thanks Micky.
Canary wrote:Irene E. wrote:Canary wrote:Guest wrote:Canary wrote:
I simply gave 2 examples of people who are extremely well (& expensively) educated who had dumbed down. Doctors & royalty.
The point being that if they can dumb down, then ..... so can you.
I've no inferiority complex whatsoever, take my word for it.
Look, I can see there's not going to be a meeting of minds here, which is fair enough. So I bid you good night.
I don't "dumb down" for anyone - particularly not lazy people.
You're right. There can be no meeting of minds as you are not bright enough to even see what the problem is.
Me & you were discussing dumbing down, so I gave you 2 very good examples of groups/institutions which have dumbed down.
And you accused me of going off topic. So ..... giving you 2 examples, to back up my argument, is going "off-topic", is it.
Yet here you are, full of insults & abuse , which have nowt to do with the subject.
If that's not going off topic, I dunno what is.
The funniest part is that you insisted you were not getting worked up.
Gosh i'd hate to see your insults when you get angry.
And insults are a sign that the argument is lost.
So really, every time you insult QC or Dean or Poca or NAA or indeed anyone else you have fallen foul of, you simply demonstrate that you have lost the argument.
...
I'm referring to people who suddenly post personal insults right in the middle of a DISCUSSION or debate.
I'm not referring to act of simply trading tit for tat insults, with no debate in sight, which is what happens with me & those 4 names.
Completely different thing altogether.
Couldn't be more different.
So put away your cheap, hollow laughter.
There's a love.
Mickyboy wrote:Pat not logged in wrote:Thanks Micky.
So who were you really Pat and why did you have to be deleted?
Stooo wrote:Pat and Xtras gone again.
Something in the water?
pat not logged in wrote:Like I said Micky I am moving. Time to move on and no I won't be back. Good luck for the future.
Irene E. wrote:Canary wrote:Irene E. wrote:Canary wrote:Guest wrote:
I don't "dumb down" for anyone - particularly not lazy people.
You're right. There can be no meeting of minds as you are not bright enough to even see what the problem is.
Me & you were discussing dumbing down, so I gave you 2 very good examples of groups/institutions which have dumbed down.
And you accused me of going off topic. So ..... giving you 2 examples, to back up my argument, is going "off-topic", is it.
Yet here you are, full of insults & abuse , which have nowt to do with the subject.
If that's not going off topic, I dunno what is.
The funniest part is that you insisted you were not getting worked up.
Gosh i'd hate to see your insults when you get angry.
And insults are a sign that the argument is lost.
So really, every time you insult QC or Dean or Poca or NAA or indeed anyone else you have fallen foul of, you simply demonstrate that you have lost the argument.
...
I'm referring to people who suddenly post personal insults right in the middle of a DISCUSSION or debate.
I'm not referring to act of simply trading tit for tat insults, with no debate in sight, which is what happens with me & those 4 names.
Completely different thing altogether.
Couldn't be more different.
So put away your cheap, hollow laughter.
There's a love.
Yes, you do both of those things regularly .....
Ali wrote:pat not logged in wrote:Like I said Micky I am moving. Time to move on and no I won't be back. Good luck for the future.
Bye Pat, take care and good luck with the move.
Canary wrote:Never. Bet you do though. Disgusting, duplicitous turd.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests