Seymour wrote:Oh gosh that sounds grim. Haven't you got a reserve valium you can swallow? Everyone should keep a reserve valium. Oh dear I hope your doc is not too delayed getting to you and hope you get relief.
Vamonos wrote:Seymour wrote:Oh gosh that sounds grim. Haven't you got a reserve valium you can swallow? Everyone should keep a reserve valium. Oh dear I hope your doc is not too delayed getting to you and hope you get relief.
Nope - no valium I'm hard pushed to even take an aspirin as a rule. But, holy crap, I need something right now, tbh...
Anyway, back to the subject of who posts where: my view is that there are too many forums for way too few people. People straying into 'hostile' territory, for whatever reason, is always going to happen. Even Stooo does it, ffs!
Seymour wrote:Vamonos wrote:Seymour wrote:Oh gosh that sounds grim. Haven't you got a reserve valium you can swallow? Everyone should keep a reserve valium. Oh dear I hope your doc is not too delayed getting to you and hope you get relief.
Nope - no valium I'm hard pushed to even take an aspirin as a rule. But, holy crap, I need something right now, tbh...
Anyway, back to the subject of who posts where: my view is that there are too many forums for way too few people. People straying into 'hostile' territory, for whatever reason, is always going to happen. Even Stooo does it, ffs!
I think this is probably the case for such general discussion forums hence none are consistently active and there are now so many alternatives for people to express a point of view
megaera wrote:Oh dear. No idea what has caused all this, but I hope it all gets sorted out - especially between Victoria and Claire
Claire wrote:Seymour wrote:Vamonos wrote:Seymour wrote:Oh gosh that sounds grim. Haven't you got a reserve valium you can swallow? Everyone should keep a reserve valium. Oh dear I hope your doc is not too delayed getting to you and hope you get relief.
Nope - no valium I'm hard pushed to even take an aspirin as a rule. But, holy crap, I need something right now, tbh...
Anyway, back to the subject of who posts where: my view is that there are too many forums for way too few people. People straying into 'hostile' territory, for whatever reason, is always going to happen. Even Stooo does it, ffs!
I think this is probably the case for such general discussion forums hence none are consistently active and there are now so many alternatives for people to express a point of view
There's only one new one though Seymour. BF, DTV, FH and here have been going on for years.
Guest wrote:Vamonos wrote:I'd still very much appreciate an answer to my earlier post from Stooo and/or Vic. Hope I get one at some point...
I thought it was very clever of you to weave in a not so subtle attack on (mentioning no names) Canary.
Vamonos wrote:Guest wrote:Vamonos wrote:I'd still very much appreciate an answer to my earlier post from Stooo and/or Vic. Hope I get one at some point...
I thought it was very clever of you to weave in a not so subtle attack on (mentioning no names) Canary.
Whistle innocently all you want I didn't mention names - you did. I wasn't trying to be 'clever' either. I was simply comparing the reason for my very brief visit to BF, to that of the person you mentioned. I went to BF to say thanks. I didn't go to BF to express my desire to chat with people like Curious, for example.
Seymour wrote:Vamonos wrote:Guest wrote:Vamonos wrote:I'd still very much appreciate an answer to my earlier post from Stooo and/or Vic. Hope I get one at some point...
I thought it was very clever of you to weave in a not so subtle attack on (mentioning no names) Canary.
Whistle innocently all you want I didn't mention names - you did. I wasn't trying to be 'clever' either. I was simply comparing the reason for my very brief visit to BF, to that of the person you mentioned. I went to BF to say thanks. I didn't go to BF to express my desire to chat with people like Curious, for example.
I really had no clue who you were talking about. Sorry for mentioning it now actually
Seymour wrote:Out of interest, why is this thread called CM3?
Hotch Potch would be better title
Dimples wrote:Seymour wrote:Out of interest, why is this thread called CM3?
Hotch Potch would be better title
Or Complete Pigswill.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests