DS and DTV Part 48.

[Guest]

He was a constant "not all refugees are terrorists maybe 1% MIGHT BE, and all the refugees are genuine and from syria". He also defended the ones let in who were clearly a lot older than claiming. So whoever was asking for links proving hes an apologist, youre either blind or fucking stupid.

So not a single link from you.

Just the old it's there, can't you see it?

[Red Okktober]

No surprise to see Annette's slacktavist creds on show in this thread.

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2194628

Any comment on the reported 9 dead Kurten? No? Well, at least you got 2 posts in about how we shouldn't speculate that the group responsible for nearly all terrorist mass murders in Europe over the last 2 decades might also be responsible for this terrorist mass murder.

Has she blamed the attack on the Hitler Youth yet?

WhatJoeThinks has to be a spoof account doesn't it? No one can be that stupid surely?

[Guest]

Sport1--(this person goes beyond apolgism. He skirts around supporting it, look at his attitude in the Russian ambassador thread.)
JJwales
Aetius_Maralas
AnnetteKurtain
Scottie2121

Kind of ironic that I've just seen jjwales saying that he's never heard of anybody attempting to excuse islamic extremism.

Odd.

I recall a lengthy thread on the subject of the Charlie Hebdo attack where bollywood spent months asserting that it was "understandable" that muslims might get sick of people drawing nasty pictures that offended them and decide to get hold of some AK47s and shoot a bunch of people to put things right.

And now we've got jj's best mate, sport1, doing something similar over the Russian shooting?

JJ either has selective memory, bad eyesight or a poor grasp of what constitutes "excusing" a bad thing.

Ar you one of those who doesn't understand the difference between explaining and understanding why terrorists do the evil things they do . . and excusing their actions?

Why dont you just join up JJ "wails", or cant you take the fact that here people dont have to follow ds rules. You'd get mullered here so thats why you dont, you apologist prick.

[Red Okktober]

A good post here by NeverEnough:

"I believe the preffered method of response from the multiculturalists is to hold a candlelight vigil and to call anyone who is in favour of stronger control over immigration and asylum racist.

OK this didn't work the first dozen times, but this time....."

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost ... tcount=393

[Guest]

Another terrible waste of life. DS apologists have assembled.

Some the apologists?

Sport1--(this person goes beyond apolgism. He skirts around supporting it, look at his attitude in the Russian ambassador thread.)
JJwales
Aetius_Maralas
AnnetteKurtain
Scottie2121

So here's the list . . now where are the links and the evidence?

[Si_Crewe]

WhatJoeThinks has to be a spoof account doesn't it? No one can be that stupid surely?

And, much as I hate to go all SSDD, if he'd have been posting criticism of islamic extremism with a similar attitude, I've no doubt he'd be "inactive" by now.

[Guest]

Sport1--(this person goes beyond apolgism. He skirts around supporting it, look at his attitude in the Russian ambassador thread.)
JJwales
Aetius_Maralas
AnnetteKurtain
Scottie2121

Kind of ironic that I've just seen jjwales saying that he's never heard of anybody attempting to excuse islamic extremism.

Odd.

I recall a lengthy thread on the subject of the Charlie Hebdo attack where bollywood spent months asserting that it was "understandable" that muslims might get sick of people drawing nasty pictures that offended them and decide to get hold of some AK47s and shoot a bunch of people to put things right.

And now we've got jj's best mate, sport1, doing something similar over the Russian shooting?

JJ either has selective memory, bad eyesight or a poor grasp of what constitutes "excusing" a bad thing.

Ar you one of those who doesn't understand the difference between explaining and understanding why terrorists do the evil things they do . . and excusing their actions?

Wrong. The aplogists don't explain. This isn't a case of them explaining something and being accused of justifying it. They actually deny there is a major problem by saying things like it's such a tiny little problem with a tiny amount of muslims who aren't real muslims anyway. The scold and tell people off. They imply that people are racist and jumping to conclusions. They 'widen' the debate to moan about other religions and divert. They compare people to that arsehole Farage to shame them. They sneer and provoke and back pat each other.

[Guest]

Ar you one of those who doesn't understand the difference between explaining and understanding why terrorists do the evil things they do . . and excusing their actions?

When the only way you can "understand" a thing is by adopting - and advocating - the same batshit-crazy justifications as the perpetrators then you are excusing their actions whether you realise it or not.

"Its understandable that they killed a bunch of cartoonists who offended their religious beliefs"

How is that "understandable"?
The only way it becomes "understandable" is if you're willing to accept that being offended by cartoons is sufficient justification for murder.

OK si, take a deep breath and flex those brain cells.

It is possible to understand something and still condemn it.

Now take your time then have a rest.

[Si_Crewe]

It is possible to understand something and still condemn it.

When the former takes precedence over the latter, you're an apologist.

[Guest]

It is possible to understand something and still condemn it.

When the former takes precedence over the latter, you're an apologist.

What do you think of the list of apologists?

[Guest]

Ar you one of those who doesn't understand the difference between explaining and understanding why terrorists do the evil things they do . . and excusing their actions?

When the only way you can "understand" a thing is by adopting - and advocating - the same batshit-crazy justifications as the perpetrators then you are excusing their actions whether you realise it or not.

"Its understandable that they killed a bunch of cartoonists who offended their religious beliefs"

How is that "understandable"?
The only way it becomes "understandable" is if you're willing to accept that being offended by cartoons is sufficient justification for murder.

OK si, take a deep breath and flex those brain cells.

It is possible to understand something and still condemn it.

Now take your time then have a rest.

So you can "understand" killing innocents in the name of religion?
Think its you who needs a rest mate, your back must be killing you all that bowing down.

[Si_Crewe]

What do you think of the list of apologists?

I think bollywood should be at the top of it.

[Guest]

Ar you one of those who doesn't understand the difference between explaining and understanding why terrorists do the evil things they do . . and excusing their actions?

When the only way you can "understand" a thing is by adopting - and advocating - the same batshit-crazy justifications as the perpetrators then you are excusing their actions whether you realise it or not.

"Its understandable that they killed a bunch of cartoonists who offended their religious beliefs"

How is that "understandable"?
The only way it becomes "understandable" is if you're willing to accept that being offended by cartoons is sufficient justification for murder.

OK si, take a deep breath and flex those brain cells.

It is possible to understand something and still condemn it.

Now take your time then have a rest.

So you can "understand" killing innocents in the name of religion?
Think its you who needs a rest mate, your back must be killing you all that bowing down.

I may be able to understand the warped and evil justifications but I unequivocally condemn terrorists and their actions.

You're too thick to get that. But that's OK and you're not alone.

[Guest]

What do you think of the list of apologists?

I think bollywood should be at the top of it.

But again no links to back up what you're saying.


Links anyone?

[Si_Crewe]

What do you think of the list of apologists?

I think bollywood should be at the top of it.

But again no links to back up what you're saying.


Links anyone?

You asked what I think.