DS and DTV Part 48.

Big Threads

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Guest » Tue Dec 20, 2016 1:54 pm

Si_Crewe wrote:
Guest wrote:
Si_Crewe wrote:
Guest wrote:What do you think of the list of apologists?


I think bollywood should be at the top of it.


But again no links to back up what you're saying.


Links anyone?


You asked what I think.


And you didn't say what you think of the list. You just added a poster to it.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby guest » Tue Dec 20, 2016 1:58 pm

Guest wrote:
Si_Crewe wrote:
Guest wrote:What do you think of the list of apologists?


I think bollywood should be at the top of it.


But again no links to back up what you're saying.


Links anyone?


No one gives a shit about your opinion here, take you apologist bullshit back to ds where its welcome.
User avatar
guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Guest » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:16 pm

guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Si_Crewe wrote:
Guest wrote:What do you think of the list of apologists?


I think bollywood should be at the top of it.


But again no links to back up what you're saying.


Links anyone?


No one gives a shit about your opinion here, take you apologist bullshit back to ds where its welcome.


Hilarious!

I'm an apologist? How did you reach that conclusion?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Guest » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:19 pm

guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Si_Crewe wrote:
Guest wrote:What do you think of the list of apologists?


I think bollywood should be at the top of it.


But again no links to back up what you're saying.


Links anyone?


No one gives a shit about your opinion here, take you apologist bullshit back to ds where its welcome.


So unsubstantiated accusations are fine?

Wow! You're so reasonable and clever!!


:off head:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Guest » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:33 pm

guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Si_Crewe wrote:
Guest wrote:What do you think of the list of apologists?


I think bollywood should be at the top of it.


But again no links to back up what you're saying.


Links anyone?


No one gives a shit about your opinion here, take you apologist bullshit back to ds where its welcome.

Interesting. Seems like you're deflecting from the fact that no one has provided a single link to back up the apologist claim

:link:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Guest » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:35 pm

Guest wrote:
Si_Crewe wrote:
Guest wrote:
Si_Crewe wrote:
Guest wrote:What do you think of the list of apologists?


I think bollywood should be at the top of it.


But again no links to back up what you're saying.


Links anyone?


You asked what I think.


And you didn't say what you think of the list. You just added a poster to it.


Dunno about Si, but I'm another who thinks those on that list all indulge in apologist behaviour to some extent. They're nearly always first in the thread criticise people for daring to mentioning Islam or jumping to conclusions. By jumping to conclusions it usually means quoting any other news source other than their beloved BBC!
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Guest » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:55 pm

Guest wrote:
Dunno about Si, but I'm another who thinks those on that list all indulge in apologist behaviour to some extent. They're nearly always first in the thread criticise people for daring to mentioning Islam or jumping to conclusions. By jumping to conclusions it usually means quoting any other news source other than their beloved BBC!


Anything to back that up? Or just you saying it means it's fact?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby VR6storm » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:56 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Viper wrote:Another terrible waste of life. DS apologists have assembled.

Some the apologists?

Sport1--(this person goes beyond apolgism. He skirts around supporting it, look at his attitude in the Russian ambassador thread.)
JJwales
Aetius_Maralas
AnnetteKurtain
Scottie2121



Well here's your challenge:

1. explain what you mean by apologists

2. provide at least one link to show how each person in your list meets the definition.


You won't be able to do that of course but I just wanted to give you the chance to back up and justify your claim. provide one link to show
No link required. It's common knowledge what these people are as they post the same old shite every time something like this happens. If you want to know what apologist means, look it up in the fucking dictionary. You'll see a picture of JJWales right by the definition. All of them are a bunch of cunts. :more beer:
[ Public Service Message : The above post may contain irony, sarcasm and outright lies. ]
User avatar
VR6storm
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 6:43 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Guest » Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:02 pm

VR6storm wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Viper wrote:Another terrible waste of life. DS apologists have assembled.

Some the apologists?

Sport1--(this person goes beyond apolgism. He skirts around supporting it, look at his attitude in the Russian ambassador thread.)
JJwales
Aetius_Maralas
AnnetteKurtain
Scottie2121



Well here's your challenge:

1. explain what you mean by apologists

2. provide at least one link to show how each person in your list meets the definition.


You won't be able to do that of course but I just wanted to give you the chance to back up and justify your claim. provide one link to show
No link required. It's common knowledge what these people are as they post the same old shite every time something like this happens. If you want to know what apologist means, look it up in the fucking dictionary. You'll see a picture of JJWales right by the definition. All of them are a bunch of cunts. :more beer:



YAWN!!

Another dozy dough ball with nothing more to offer than - durrrrr, well, they just are, everyone knows that.


As for the definition, I asked a specific poster how they defined the word apologist. The reason I asked that is there are certain posters who view anyone who doesn't go into a prolonged and CAPITAL LETTER SPATTERED mad rant every time there is an outrage is an apologist. And there are a few of those around here.



Any links from you?

Would you like me to set out the list of 'apologists' again just to help you?

Will be happy to help.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Viper » Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:19 pm

Lol guest. Why do you think consensus of opinion is that those on the list (and others) are apologists? Please support your answer with links. The consensus is formed i guess you wish to overturn it?
No one likes SJWs.
User avatar
Viper
 
Posts: 5747
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 7:32 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Viper » Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:20 pm

Lol guest worried about being labelled apologist/widener by consensus of opinion comes here to try and widen/divert (classic apologist tactics) :gigglesnshit:
No one likes SJWs.
User avatar
Viper
 
Posts: 5747
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 7:32 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Guest » Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:23 pm

Viper - your point was sooooo good you had to post it twice lol



Now - I asked first - :link: S
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Guest » Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:25 pm

VR6storm wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Viper wrote:Another terrible waste of life. DS apologists have assembled.

Some the apologists?

Sport1--(this person goes beyond apolgism. He skirts around supporting it, look at his attitude in the Russian ambassador thread.)
JJwales
Aetius_Maralas
AnnetteKurtain
Scottie2121



Well here's your challenge:

1. explain what you mean by apologists

2. provide at least one link to show how each person in your list meets the definition.


You won't be able to do that of course but I just wanted to give you the chance to back up and justify your claim. provide one link to show
No link required. It's common knowledge what these people are as they post the same old shite every time something like this happens. If you want to know what apologist means, look it up in the fucking dictionary. You'll see a picture of JJWales right by the definition. All of them are a bunch of cunts. :more beer:

This is possibly the stupidest answer so far :roll:

Just provide a link you dope. Thats all that was asked for
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Si_Crewe » Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:26 pm

Viper wrote:Lol guest worried about being labelled apologist/widener by consensus of opinion comes here to try and widen/divert (classic apologist tactics) :gigglesnshit:


But there are people who're apologists for nationalist and right-wing extremism too.

So there we are.

Or something. :ooer:
User avatar
Si_Crewe
 
Posts: 4499
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:33 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 48.

Postby Guest » Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:27 pm

A consensus of 'normals' is, in reality, a consensus of oddballs thickunts.
User avatar
Guest
 

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest