DS and DTV Part 49.

Big Threads

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Vam » Sun Jan 08, 2017 2:58 pm

Victoria wrote:
VR6storm wrote:
Victoria wrote: Sorry to hear that Holls, i hope the pain eases soon.

I've got a black eye.

They do say things come in threes, i wonder how Stooo and Mes are.

Image
And i got a sore paw.....

Image


I hope your hand gets better soon Stormy.

Image


How on earth did you get a black eye, Vic? :yikes:
User avatar
Vam
 
Posts: 10438
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:57 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Guest » Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:27 pm

Guest wrote:
Si_Crewe wrote:
Guest wrote:Minnie isn't anti muslim, she's anti terrorists and religious terrorists. She's right about one thing, you can't post you don't support islamic terrorism or unctrolled borders without being accused of being racist.


While discussing islamic terrorism, I make a point of always referring to the people I'm talking about as "jihadis".
I don't have anything against muslims but, as far as I'm concerned, jihadis can all burn in hell with a red-hot poker shoved up their arse, and I'm not sure why anybody (other than a terrorist sympathiser) would feel differently.

Course, on DS that just meant that the term "jihadi" was considered a pejorative term for "muslim" and I got a ban for anything critical that I said about them.

So, I guess the DS mod's see jihadis and muslims as synonomous. :scratch: :off head:

Time to let it go Si. :bored:



I agree . . let it go.

Plus, I don't believe you were banned for criticising jihadists/terrorists. Where's the evidence of that? Deleted?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Frankly » Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:35 pm

Vam wrote:
Perpetual wrote:
Vam wrote:
Guest wrote:I tried to post yesterday supporting Keyser but my post wasn't approved. I didn't abuse or out anyone, and I was polite but it wasn't approved. I said people comparing Keysers posts to JRAs post about his sex life, when and how he cums etc and saying Jason was worse was out of order. So how come it wasn't approved, or is JRA protected now?


I kind of get why some might think Keys can be a pain in the ass sometimes. But given a choice, I'd far rather see Keys' posts around here than that tediously petulant dickhead, jra's :roll:

When did all this turn into a popularity contest anyway? :dunno:


I do find it a bit creepy, and actually awkward for the female posters he seems to target. A couple of times, a new female poster has posted on here, and he's straight in there with 'let me know what your Ds username is, I'll pm you! He is smutty sometimes too. Not as bad as JRA admittedly, but he seemingly has harassed females too, yet people seem to make allowances for him?


Yes, I know. I've seen Keys do what you describe and, yes, I do find it a bit cringe at times :ooer:

I don't make allowances for Keys, per se, but I do have my own (gut instinct) thoughts on the underlying reasons that fuel Keys' apparent need to try and 'connect' with some women on forums. There's no way I'm going to expand on those thoughts, because I know that would probably cause him some embarrassment. I could also have read the situation completely wrongly, of course! :wink:


Nor should you. That's something I really like about you, your integrity. :smilin:
User avatar
Frankly
 
Posts: 1357
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 2:23 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Guest » Sun Jan 08, 2017 4:12 pm

superb nonsense by numbertwat:
First he says sex was mainly about breeding "in history",

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85094085&postcount=104

when asked for evidence to support his academic claim he comes up with:
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85094145&postcount=106
"i can't be bothered but I know I'm right"

he should be a barrister with that sort of debating skill and knowledge.
:hand:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Guest » Sun Jan 08, 2017 5:03 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Si_Crewe wrote:
Guest wrote:Minnie isn't anti muslim, she's anti terrorists and religious terrorists. She's right about one thing, you can't post you don't support islamic terrorism or unctrolled borders without being accused of being racist.


While discussing islamic terrorism, I make a point of always referring to the people I'm talking about as "jihadis".
I don't have anything against muslims but, as far as I'm concerned, jihadis can all burn in hell with a red-hot poker shoved up their arse, and I'm not sure why anybody (other than a terrorist sympathiser) would feel differently.

Course, on DS that just meant that the term "jihadi" was considered a pejorative term for "muslim" and I got a ban for anything critical that I said about them.

So, I guess the DS mod's see jihadis and muslims as synonomous. :scratch: :off head:

Time to let it go Si. :bored:



I agree . . let it go.

Plus, I don't believe you were banned for criticising jihadists/terrorists. Where's the evidence of that? Deleted?


:pmsl: You can see why people used to say "cool story bro" at his posts. Puzzler will be along soon to back him soon about how DS is a jihadi loving paradise.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby megaera » Sun Jan 08, 2017 5:28 pm

Guest wrote:superb nonsense by numbertwat:
First he says sex was mainly about breeding "in history",

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85094085&postcount=104

when asked for evidence to support his academic claim he comes up with:
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85094145&postcount=106
"i can't be bothered but I know I'm right"

he should be a barrister with that sort of debating skill and knowledge.
:hand:

Even when given irrefutable evidence that he is wrong, he still insists he is right :gigglesnshit:
User avatar
megaera
 
Posts: 993
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:04 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Guest » Sun Jan 08, 2017 5:33 pm

megaera wrote:
Guest wrote:superb nonsense by numbertwat:
First he says sex was mainly about breeding "in history",

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85094085&postcount=104

when asked for evidence to support his academic claim he comes up with:
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85094145&postcount=106
"i can't be bothered but I know I'm right"

he should be a barrister with that sort of debating skill and knowledge.
:hand:

Even when given irrefutable evidence that he is wrong, he still insists he is right :gigglesnshit:


He's one of the thickest people i've ever seen.
He gets away with saying a load of old shit most of the time because who can be arsed to argue with a fucking moron?
Nice to see someone calling him on his bullshit.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Guest » Sun Jan 08, 2017 5:38 pm

megaera wrote:
Guest wrote:superb nonsense by numbertwat:
First he says sex was mainly about breeding "in history",

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85094085&postcount=104

when asked for evidence to support his academic claim he comes up with:
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85094145&postcount=106
"i can't be bothered but I know I'm right"

he should be a barrister with that sort of debating skill and knowledge.
:hand:

Even when given irrefutable evidence that he is wrong, he still insists he is right :gigglesnshit:


I don't know why Planets is bothering with him. He's clearly thick as shit. His response to everything he said being rubbished was that Planets stuff came from a book, don't believe books, the Bible is a book and that isn't true. Planets was talking about artifacts in museums. :facepalm:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Guest » Sun Jan 08, 2017 5:49 pm

Guest wrote:superb nonsense by numbertwat:
First he says sex was mainly about breeding "in history",

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85094085&postcount=104

when asked for evidence to support his academic claim he comes up with:
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85094145&postcount=106
"i can't be bothered but I know I'm right"

he should be a barrister with that sort of debating skill and knowledge.
:hand:


You don't think procreation is an innate motivation? :dunno: Which I think is sort of what he's saying.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Guest » Sun Jan 08, 2017 5:51 pm

JPNumbertwat really shows himself up. Such a brainless moron. :gigglesnshit:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Guest » Sun Jan 08, 2017 6:09 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:superb nonsense by numbertwat:
First he says sex was mainly about breeding "in history",

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85094085&postcount=104

when asked for evidence to support his academic claim he comes up with:
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85094145&postcount=106
"i can't be bothered but I know I'm right"

he should be a barrister with that sort of debating skill and knowledge.
:hand:


You don't think procreation is an innate motivation? :dunno: Which I think is sort of what he's saying.


He said oral sex wasn't performed in history. He made a categorical statement. He was proved wrong. He's been trying to weasel out of it ever since.
He's a fucking moron. He says categorical statements that are total made up rubbish all the time. He was asked to support his point of view with facts and can't. So instead he's trying to make out he said something else.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Vam » Sun Jan 08, 2017 6:17 pm

Guest wrote:JPNumbertwat really shows himself up. Such a brainless moron. :gigglesnshit:


It's fab to see when planets decides to get stuck in and painstakingly decimate someone's BS - point by ludicrous point. As she's doing today, amply demonstrating what a complete ignoramus jp(wotsit) is.

And still that fool keeps on digging deeper...! :mrgreen:

(ETA - really enjoyed seeing planets fluster and frazzle AddledAnnie, too :yess: )
User avatar
Vam
 
Posts: 10438
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:57 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Drunk Dalek » Sun Jan 08, 2017 6:24 pm

AngryGay wrote:
Drunk Dalek wrote:
AngryGay wrote:Good morning humans


:kinell: Human? :slap:


Are you not? :yikes:


We of he master race are not human :snooty: :bum:
User avatar
Drunk Dalek
 
Posts: 395
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2015 2:54 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Guest » Sun Jan 08, 2017 6:27 pm

planets will be getting aggressive PMs from numbertwat soon, he hates being made to look foolish especially by women.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 49.

Postby Guest » Sun Jan 08, 2017 6:34 pm

He's still trying to make out he was right and just misunderstood
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=85095421&postcount=178

"And I(sic) was to say I was wrong... that in it's self would be inaccurate."

what a fucking genius intellect
User avatar
Guest
 

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest