jp761 wrote:Has the big-baby been busy again. ;)
No you've only just arrived
jp761 wrote:Has the big-baby been busy again. ;)
jp761 wrote:
Spot on and some guests are members of DS if they are so interested in DS and it's posters, they should declare who they are on there. They are no doubt hiding things it isn't a level playing field.
Goodwife wrote:jp761 wrote:
Spot on and some guests are members of DS if they are so interested in DS and it's posters, they should declare who they are on there. They are no doubt hiding things it isn't a level playing field.
No they shouldn't why do you have to declare who you are?
you don't know who I am and I post on DS. It is irrelevant to the discussions I take part in on here.
Well it would level the playing field. But more importantly, why would anyone who is clearly interested in DS and it's posters want to hide who they are on the site.Goodwife wrote:jp761 wrote:
Spot on and some guests are members of DS if they are so interested in DS and it's posters, they should declare who they are on there. They are no doubt hiding things it isn't a level playing field.
No they shouldn't why do you have to declare who you are?
you don't know who I am and I post on DS. It is irrelevant to the discussions I take part in on here.
It could obviously be proven. But as my post to Goodwife explains I just don't see why someone needs to hide their DS identity.Canucklehead wrote:Goodwife wrote:jp761 wrote:
Spot on and some guests are members of DS if they are so interested in DS and it's posters, they should declare who they are on there. They are no doubt hiding things it isn't a level playing field.
No they shouldn't why do you have to declare who you are?
you don't know who I am and I post on DS. It is irrelevant to the discussions I take part in on here.
I agree. And besides, how would we know if they were being honest? Any guest could claim to be a DS poster, Scottie, Jason Watkins, Whedonite, Retford, muggins, ... it's not as if the admin can confirm or deny it. They can probably check ip's and tell one guest from another and if it matches an existing member, but nothing more.
Just finish your Rusks.Guest wrote:jp761 wrote:Has the big-baby been busy again. ;)
No you've only just arrived
jp761 wrote:Canucklehead wrote:Goodwife wrote:jp761 wrote:
Spot on and some guests are members of DS if they are so interested in DS and it's posters, they should declare who they are on there. They are no doubt hiding things it isn't a level playing field.
No they shouldn't why do you have to declare who you are?
you don't know who I am and I post on DS. It is irrelevant to the discussions I take part in on here.
I agree. And besides, how would we know if they were being honest? Any guest could claim to be a DS poster, Scottie, Jason Watkins, Whedonite, Retford, muggins, ... it's not as if the admin can confirm or deny it. They can probably check ip's and tell one guest from another and if it matches an existing member, but nothing more.
It could obviously be proven. But as my post to Goodwife explains I just don't see why someone needs to hide their DS identity.
Vam wrote:Guest wrote:Vam wrote:VR6storm wrote:Guest wrote:
That's a bit rich considering how long you and shitstorm have been prodding jra for a reaction
I have NEVER 'prodded' JR'tha...... nor would i want to. So fuck of scuzzbucket.
Gotta love these highly excitable Guests, and their batshit crazy exaggeration.
No reference from me since page 46 of this thread - and even that post was to point out that there had been no mention from me for 65 pages before that
Do the math, Guesty
So you've stopped baiting jra for, what, two weeks now? Congrats on your restraint, but I was referring to the previous months of you and your creepy sidekick boring the shit out of everyone
Which is why I said it's a bit rich of you to ask people to stop baiting JP
....
Okay. Let me put it another way: fuck off, you shitstirring asshole
Sue Ellen frae Dallas wrote:Lol very true. He can't remember half of what he blurts out. That's why it's better to get some music on and chill when you've been drinking. Avoid posting on forums or Facebook as you'll regret it.
jp761 wrote:Interesting reading, it appears that some guests can do metamorphosis into Keysers beer cans.
Has he publicly talked about drinking lots of alcohol ? It cracks me up how some people THINK they know about the lives of others.
jp761 wrote:Well it would level the playing field. But more importantly, why would anyone who is clearly interested in DS and it's posters want to hide who they are on the site.Goodwife wrote:jp761 wrote:
Spot on and some guests are members of DS if they are so interested in DS and it's posters, they should declare who they are on there. They are no doubt hiding things it isn't a level playing field.
No they shouldn't why do you have to declare who you are?
you don't know who I am and I post on DS. It is irrelevant to the discussions I take part in on here.
What are the reasons ?
jp761 wrote:It could obviously be proven. But as my post to Goodwife explains I just don't see why someone needs to hide their DS identity.Canucklehead wrote:Goodwife wrote:jp761 wrote:
Spot on and some guests are members of DS if they are so interested in DS and it's posters, they should declare who they are on there. They are no doubt hiding things it isn't a level playing field.
No they shouldn't why do you have to declare who you are?
you don't know who I am and I post on DS. It is irrelevant to the discussions I take part in on here.
I agree. And besides, how would we know if they were being honest? Any guest could claim to be a DS poster, Scottie, Jason Watkins, Whedonite, Retford, muggins, ... it's not as if the admin can confirm or deny it. They can probably check ip's and tell one guest from another and if it matches an existing member, but nothing more.
Easily, just a simple I'm now going to post in a certain thread on DS. If the post shows up alongside the FMs user name who they are claiming to be, then yeah that will prove who they are.Canucklehead wrote:jp761 wrote:Canucklehead wrote:Goodwife wrote:jp761 wrote:
Spot on and some guests are members of DS if they are so interested in DS and it's posters, they should declare who they are on there. They are no doubt hiding things it isn't a level playing field.
No they shouldn't why do you have to declare who you are?
you don't know who I am and I post on DS. It is irrelevant to the discussions I take part in on here.
I agree. And besides, how would we know if they were being honest? Any guest could claim to be a DS poster, Scottie, Jason Watkins, Whedonite, Retford, muggins, ... it's not as if the admin can confirm or deny it. They can probably check ip's and tell one guest from another and if it matches an existing member, but nothing more.
It could obviously be proven. But as my post to Goodwife explains I just don't see why someone needs to hide their DS identity.
How could it be proven?
Goodwife wrote:jp761 wrote:Well it would level the playing field. But more importantly, why would anyone who is clearly interested in DS and it's posters want to hide who they are on the site.Goodwife wrote:jp761 wrote:
Spot on and some guests are members of DS if they are so interested in DS and it's posters, they should declare who they are on there. They are no doubt hiding things it isn't a level playing field.
No they shouldn't why do you have to declare who you are?
you don't know who I am and I post on DS. It is irrelevant to the discussions I take part in on here.
What are the reasons ?
quite simply, its non of your beeswax
the thread is about discussing DS and its posters. it matters not a jot if you are a poster or not
there is no stipulation that you should say who you are and potentially open yourself up to ridicule and abuse as some of you have
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests