DS and DTV Part 54

Big Threads

DS and DTV Part 54

Postby jra » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:35 pm

Junglejayne wrote:
jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Don't post controversial shit if you don't want to be pulled up on it.


That's fair enough, but these posts happened ages ago. But, somebody in their right mind thought they'd re-resurrect the subject again for the troll factor. It's raking up old coals, all discussed previously. Time to move on. It's not like I made some of these posts in the last week or so. Somebody even went to the trouble of resurrecting a post I made about my member. This has gone far beyond being pulled up for a post or posts, it's plain and simple forum bullying by a pack of anonymous keyboard warriors.

As you were.


And you play along with it. If you really wanted to move on you just wouldn't engage and those dragging it up would be wasting their time :dunno:


Only because the subject was brought up. What's the point in having a discussion forum like this, if people don't engage.

This thread has been starved of its oxygen because DS is down, so let's think of something jra and jp for example have done to keep this going or talk about whether some random girl band member is overweight or not.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 6752
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Guest » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:39 pm

jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Don't post controversial shit if you don't want to be pulled up on it.


That's fair enough, but these posts happened ages ago. But, somebody in their right mind thought they'd re-resurrect the subject again for the troll factor. It's raking up old coals, all discussed previously. Time to move on. It's not like I made some of these posts in the last week or so. Somebody even went to the trouble of resurrecting a post I made about my member. This has gone far beyond being pulled up for a post or posts, it's plain and simple forum bullying by a pack of anonymous keyboard warriors.

As you were.


I didn't realise u had rules! How old do your comments have to be before we are no longer allowed tu mention then?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby NastyNickers » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:45 pm

jra wrote:
Junglejayne wrote:
jra wrote:
Guest wrote:Don't post controversial shit if you don't want to be pulled up on it.


That's fair enough, but these posts happened ages ago. But, somebody in their right mind thought they'd re-resurrect the subject again for the troll factor. It's raking up old coals, all discussed previously. Time to move on. It's not like I made some of these posts in the last week or so. Somebody even went to the trouble of resurrecting a post I made about my member. This has gone far beyond being pulled up for a post or posts, it's plain and simple forum bullying by a pack of anonymous keyboard warriors.

As you were.


And you play along with it. If you really wanted to move on you just wouldn't engage and those dragging it up would be wasting their time :dunno:


Only because the subject was brought up. What's the point in having a discussion forum like this, if people don't engage.

This thread has been starved of its oxygen because DS is down, so let's think of something jra and jp for example have done to keep this going or talk about whether some random girl band member is overweight or not.


You're as guilty as anyone else for keeping it going.
You say people should move on and not bring it up, but then say it's a discussion forum and people should engage. You can't have it both ways.
Look, you know that people are going to keep going at it. And with your replies you stir up another thing for people to bite at. The whole most men pay for sex thing, for example. You know the reaction it's going to get. Why not just do as you preach and move on? You've spent far too long going in circles with various guests.
User avatar
NastyNickers
 
Posts: 1416
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:06 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Frankly » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:56 pm

jra wrote:
Perpetual wrote:
Staliaoftheknife wrote:
guest wrote:So what if jra sees escorts? Do any of you believe in a woman's right to work as an escort? Without the clients they wouldn't make any money, think about that. Personally I think brothels should be legal, it's safer for women to work together. I have no problem with escorts, brothels or their clients.

This I agree with, it should at least be decriminalised, that way at least the woman can have health check ect and some semblance of safety.



Me too, absolutely. There will always be the sad cases of desperate 'local' ones though, used, and abused for £20 a go. :shake head: :grrrrr:


I thought better of you until you waded in high fiving Vams post.


Sorry JRA, but I agreed with her post, and why she posted it. If you can't take it, don't give it.
User avatar
Frankly
 
Posts: 1477
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 1:23 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Guest » Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:15 pm

jra wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
jra wrote:
Am I. That wasn't really the point though was it. There are plenty of other shithole towns in the UK, any one of which could have been mentioned.


Can I ask a question? You've said a few times that you don't care what people think of you online, we're all anonymous, etc., but the way your replies are often worded would indicate that some of the stuff said DOES bother you. Does it bother you?

No one is denying your right to post, just wondering if you're honest about your claim that you don't care. Didn't you say you did a search on your name here if you've been away for a while? That's not really something a person who doesn't give a stuff would do. :dunno:


No. I don't care really, but I don't see the need to endlessly drag up posts that I made ages ago, which have already been discussed at length. It's like going down to the pub and a mate of yours says 'do you remember that conservation we had on <insert subject> a year ago'. It's history.

Some people on here must be really bored to go to the trouble of digging up old posts of mine that should be consigned to history.



Have you ever thought, in all seriousness that it's your attitude that people dislike so pick at you? if you didn't post about your cock (however long ago it was) then people couldnt use it against you now. Its your own fault for thinking we want to hear about you paying for sex, how you cum and how big it is.

You play the victim constantly and claim you're only here to defend yourself. That's not true though lots of posters have been attacked by you out of nowhere and so you're lying when you say you only respond to posts about you. You say you dont care, but you go searching for mentions of your name, that isnt "not caring" . To top it all youre constantly telling people to get a life, its only forums etc but your actions show youre a hypocrite because you dont think that applies to you. Change your attitude and people might get off your back.

:thumbsup:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby jp761 » Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:15 pm

The poster last night talking as though they come from the ghetto there was/is a poster on DS on the BB forum who used to sound just like that. On the whole she was actually really funny.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 4483
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Guest » Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:22 pm

jp761 wrote:The poster last night talking as though they come from the ghetto there was/is a poster on DS on the BB forum who used to sound just like that. On the whole she was actually really funny.


Funniest thing is she's white and from a middle class background.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby jp761 » Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:33 pm

So imo I said the one from Little Mix looks slightly overweight from what I have seen of her on my TV and I said she still looks perfectly fine.

How the fuck does this equate to me bitching and moaning about WOMEN being overweight.. Jesus fucking christ GUEST read every part of that discussion or fuck off!! :thumbsup:
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 4483
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Staliaoftheknife » Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:40 pm

jp761 wrote:So imo I said the one from Little Mix looks slightly overweight from what I have seen of her on my TV and I said she still looks perfectly fine.

How the fuck does this equate to me bitching and moaning about WOMEN being overweight.. Jesus fucking christ GUEST read every part of that discussion or fuck off!! :thumbsup:

She was good enough to point out how fucked up I am though so it wasn't all bad, at least I know now. :gigglesnshit:
User avatar
Staliaoftheknife
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby jp761 » Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:45 pm

What I have noted is that some females on here can talk in a way that 'COULD' be perceived as negative about another females 'weight' and no one instantly jumps down their throats. It happened last night.

Ok fine may be what I said also 'COULD' be perceived as negative but as I said the clue is in the fact I said the one from Little Mix still looks absolutely fine.

Some people should quit with the instantly jumping down certain FMs throats though at least read a discussion in full first.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 4483
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Guest » Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:45 pm

Staliaoftheknife wrote:
jp761 wrote:So imo I said the one from Little Mix looks slightly overweight from what I have seen of her on my TV and I said she still looks perfectly fine.

How the fuck does this equate to me bitching and moaning about WOMEN being overweight.. Jesus fucking christ GUEST read every part of that discussion or fuck off!! :thumbsup:

She was good enough to point out how fucked up I am though so it wasn't all bad, at least I know now. :gigglesnshit:


User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby jp761 » Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:47 pm

Staliaoftheknife wrote:
jp761 wrote:So imo I said the one from Little Mix looks slightly overweight from what I have seen of her on my TV and I said she still looks perfectly fine.

How the fuck does this equate to me bitching and moaning about WOMEN being overweight.. Jesus fucking christ GUEST read every part of that discussion or fuck off!! :thumbsup:

She was good enough to point out how fucked up I am though so it wasn't all bad, at least I know now. :gigglesnshit:
Yes very helpful input I mean she obviously knows you better than you know yourself. :roll: :laughing:
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 4483
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Guest » Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:48 pm

jra wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
jra wrote:
Am I. That wasn't really the point though was it. There are plenty of other shithole towns in the UK, any one of which could have been mentioned.


Can I ask a question? You've said a few times that you don't care what people think of you online, we're all anonymous, etc., but the way your replies are often worded would indicate that some of the stuff said DOES bother you. Does it bother you?

No one is denying your right to post, just wondering if you're honest about your claim that you don't care. Didn't you say you did a search on your name here if you've been away for a while? That's not really something a person who doesn't give a stuff would do. :dunno:


No. I don't care really, but I don't see the need to endlessly drag up posts that I made ages ago, which have already been discussed at length. It's like going down to the pub and a mate of yours says 'do you remember that conservation we had on <insert subject> a year ago'. It's history.

Some people on here must be really bored to go to the trouble of digging up old posts of mine that should be consigned to history.


You must be really bored generally because you devote so much to wibbling on and on about how little you care and how everyone should move on.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Guest » Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:49 pm

I wonder what Terencechant had been upto without DS?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 53

Postby Canucklehead » Sat Feb 25, 2017 4:03 pm

Guest wrote:I wonder what Terencechant had been upto without DS?


I suspect this...

Image
Niiiii!!!!!!!
User avatar
Canucklehead
 
Posts: 1451
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:59 am

Next

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests