DS and DTV Part 55

Big Threads

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby Guest » Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:13 pm

Canucklehead wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Easily, just a simple I'm now going to post in a certain thread on DS. If the post shows up alongside the FMs user name who they are claiming to be, then yeah that will prove who they are.


Doesn't sound like a very good system. It's like asking them to jump through extra hoops for your benefit, not theirs. Why would they do that? I think as the admin have made guest posting an accepted thing, and that it's not necessary to identify who you are on DS, we should respect their rules and move on. Otherwise this topic just goes round and round.


Well some guests clearly don't respect Stoo's rules he mentioned it last night.

And as I've said if some guests carry on spewing out crap about a few of us, then they can expect a few members here to keep countering them. Around and around it will no doubt go then, so be it.


And their posts get disapproved if they don't abide, simple enough.

Those who moan a lot about guest posting are in a sense disrespecting the forum. It's one of the features, get over it. As is being allowed to join without using your DS moniker. Some choose to do it and others do not. We're all still virtually anonymous, unless I'm a cat and you're a horse. :mrgreen:


Look jp's been here for over a month now it's time you lot follow his orders :grrrrr:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby Guest » Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:15 pm

jp761 wrote:@Goodwife Why guilty conscience you ask.

Hiding the reason why they got permanent banned is one possible, as it could possibly be found in post history. Also if they are active on DS now but don't want anyone who posts on Dogs to see what they post on DS.

Basically whatever way you look at it, it all looks like someone who is hiding and being soft.


You're like a kid trying to provoke someone into a response by calling them names. It's pathetic from a grown man.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby Guest » Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:17 pm

jp761 wrote:
Guest wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Guest wrote:
jp761 wrote:Interesting reading, it appears that some guests can do metamorphosis into Keysers beer cans. :pmsl:

Has he publicly talked about drinking lots of alcohol ? It cracks me up how some people THINK they know about the lives of others.


Tut tut. An apostrophe is missing. Can you see where or should I help you?
Yes dear, I'm not writing an important letter so I don't always give a fuck. ;)

You don't have much in your locker do you, one-trick pony.

:thumbsup:


Whereas you haven't got any question marks left in your locker.



lol
Duh, when I want to ask a question I have. :laughing:


I don't think you have any, have you?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby Guest » Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:19 pm

Well I for one would have signed up to be a member here, but I won't now jp is a member as he repeatedly says it's perfectly alright to follow arguments out of a thread and into people's inboxes. It's great for DOgs you don't have a PM feature but anyone disagreeing with him under their DS name here is just asking for trouble.

You may not like that as a reason but I think a lot of people feel like that.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby Goodwife » Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:25 pm

jp761 wrote:
Goodwife wrote:
jp761 wrote:@Goodwife Why guilty conscience you ask.

Hiding the reason why they got permanent banned is one possible, as it could possibly be found in post history. Also if they are active on DS now but don't want anyone who posts on Dogs to see what they post on DS.

Basically whatever way you look at it, it all looks like someone who is hiding and being soft.


its not hiding it? hiding it would be posting on DS under a second account after the first got banned.

this is a separate unrelated forum to DS. Yes it shares some of the same members, yes it has some previous posters of DS but that's it.

Anyone can see what I post on DS, in fact they don't even need to be a DS member to see it. So therefore I am not hiding anything...

If posters on here choose to talk about me then so be it, I might even join in the conversation :canny:

but the fact is I am not a notorious DS poster and I don't get talked about. clearly I am not an attention seeker :twirl:


So I am not hiding anything. I joined this forum after seeing it mentioned on DS, it piqued my interest and I enjoyed reading it for months and months and months. then I had something to say and became a member. My being a member of another forum is irrelevant.

by the way this :flog: applies to you. Just in case you hadn't noticed the mods chose to operate the site letting guests post, you have three options, like it, lump it or leave it
You're just stating a few obvious things it's nothing that everyone doesn't already know, you may or may not be making it up. People are still hiding things such as who are they on DS, how do they post on there what were they banned for. But it's fine of course it's up to them, but that still doesn't stop some of us bringing it up.

I've already talked about the admin and guest side of stuff in other posts.


so obvious you still don't get them
User avatar
Goodwife
 
Posts: 9047
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2017 2:53 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby Guest » Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:34 pm

anonymous baghead cunt wrote:
jp761 wrote:Fair enough. If some people want to hide what they got/get up too on DS then fine that's up to them. Imo it shows a guilty conscience though.


It's not about hiding what people are up to or a guilty conscience it's about avoiding a shit load of PMs from you :thumbsup:


Are you female?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby jp761 » Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:45 pm

Goodwife wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Goodwife wrote:
jp761 wrote:@Goodwife Why guilty conscience you ask.

Hiding the reason why they got permanent banned is one possible, as it could possibly be found in post history. Also if they are active on DS now but don't want anyone who posts on Dogs to see what they post on DS.

Basically whatever way you look at it, it all looks like someone who is hiding and being soft.


its not hiding it? hiding it would be posting on DS under a second account after the first got banned.

this is a separate unrelated forum to DS. Yes it shares some of the same members, yes it has some previous posters of DS but that's it.

Anyone can see what I post on DS, in fact they don't even need to be a DS member to see it. So therefore I am not hiding anything...

If posters on here choose to talk about me then so be it, I might even join in the conversation :canny:

but the fact is I am not a notorious DS poster and I don't get talked about. clearly I am not an attention seeker :twirl:


So I am not hiding anything. I joined this forum after seeing it mentioned on DS, it piqued my interest and I enjoyed reading it for months and months and months. then I had something to say and became a member. My being a member of another forum is irrelevant.

by the way this :flog: applies to you. Just in case you hadn't noticed the mods chose to operate the site letting guests post, you have three options, like it, lump it or leave it
You're just stating a few obvious things it's nothing that everyone doesn't already know, you may or may not be making it up. People are still hiding things such as who are they on DS, how do they post on there what were they banned for. But it's fine of course it's up to them, but that still doesn't stop some of us bringing it up.

I've already talked about the admin and guest side of stuff in other posts.


so obvious you still don't get them
I do get that some people like to lambaste others but they are too soft to say who they are on DS. Gutless wonders hiding behind the moniker of 'guest'.

When I say this stuff, I'm not even referring to most of the members on here. I actually think if guests weren't posting at all in this thread the thread would have a lot more decent and reasoned conversation going on. Most members actually can do this I've seen it a number of times.

These are obviously just my opinions though and probably one or two others share them, but hey it's not our site. If we don't want to be here we can obviously just leave.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby jp761 » Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:49 pm

Guest wrote:Well I for one would have signed up to be a member here, but I won't now jp is a member as he repeatedly says it's perfectly alright to follow arguments out of a thread and into people's inboxes. It's great for DOgs you don't have a PM feature but anyone disagreeing with him under their DS name here is just asking for trouble.

You may not like that as a reason but I think a lot of people feel like that.
I see don't let me stop you. Ok then idiot yes I do love a good inbox. :roll:

Ok idiot boy SO what latest trouble have I been in then ? :pmsl:
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby jp761 » Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:50 pm

anonymous baghead cunt wrote:
jp761 wrote:Fair enough. If some people want to hide what they got/get up too on DS then fine that's up to them. Imo it shows a guilty conscience though.


It's not about hiding what people are up to or a guilty conscience it's about avoiding a shit load of PMs from you :thumbsup:
Yep be very scared I'm all over those inboxes. :off head:
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby jp761 » Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:53 pm

Guest wrote:
jp761 wrote:@Goodwife Why guilty conscience you ask.

Hiding the reason why they got permanent banned is one possible, as it could possibly be found in post history. Also if they are active on DS now but don't want anyone who posts on Dogs to see what they post on DS.

Basically whatever way you look at it, it all looks like someone who is hiding and being soft.


You're like a kid trying to provoke someone into a response by calling them names. It's pathetic from a grown man.
Name calling. lol Don't make me laugh my so called name calling in these posts is very tame, it barely even qualifies.

:thumbsup:
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby Guest » Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:05 pm

jp761 wrote:
Goodwife wrote:
jp761 wrote:
Goodwife wrote:
jp761 wrote:@Goodwife Why guilty conscience you ask.

Hiding the reason why they got permanent banned is one possible, as it could possibly be found in post history. Also if they are active on DS now but don't want anyone who posts on Dogs to see what they post on DS.

Basically whatever way you look at it, it all looks like someone who is hiding and being soft.


its not hiding it? hiding it would be posting on DS under a second account after the first got banned.

this is a separate unrelated forum to DS. Yes it shares some of the same members, yes it has some previous posters of DS but that's it.

Anyone can see what I post on DS, in fact they don't even need to be a DS member to see it. So therefore I am not hiding anything...

If posters on here choose to talk about me then so be it, I might even join in the conversation :canny:

but the fact is I am not a notorious DS poster and I don't get talked about. clearly I am not an attention seeker :twirl:


So I am not hiding anything. I joined this forum after seeing it mentioned on DS, it piqued my interest and I enjoyed reading it for months and months and months. then I had something to say and became a member. My being a member of another forum is irrelevant.

by the way this :flog: applies to you. Just in case you hadn't noticed the mods chose to operate the site letting guests post, you have three options, like it, lump it or leave it
You're just stating a few obvious things it's nothing that everyone doesn't already know, you may or may not be making it up. People are still hiding things such as who are they on DS, how do they post on there what were they banned for. But it's fine of course it's up to them, but that still doesn't stop some of us bringing it up.

I've already talked about the admin and guest side of stuff in other posts.


so obvious you still don't get them
I do get that some people like to lambaste others but they are too soft to say who they are on DS. Gutless wonders hiding behind the moniker of 'guest'.

When I say this stuff, I'm not even referring to most of the members on here. I actually think if guests weren't posting at all in this thread the thread would have a lot more decent and reasoned conversation going on. Most members actually can do this I've seen it a number of times.

These are obviously just my opinions though and probably one or two others share them, but hey it's not our site. If we don't want to be here we can obviously just leave.

Awww....
You're not even who you say you are sweetie. So don't be going on about us lovely guests. You silly billy.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby Guest » Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:08 pm

It's funny the two people that shout the loudest about guests, guest posted themselves. :twirl:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby Guest » Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:14 pm

anonymous baghead cunt wrote:
jp761 wrote:Fair enough. If some people want to hide what they got/get up too on DS then fine that's up to them. Imo it shows a guilty conscience though.


It's not about hiding what people are up to or a guilty conscience it's about avoiding a shit load of PMs from you :thumbsup:


YES!!! :canny: :twirl: :twirl: :twirl:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby Guest » Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:18 pm

Guest wrote:Well I for one would have signed up to be a member here, but I won't now jp is a member as he repeatedly says it's perfectly alright to follow arguments out of a thread and into people's inboxes. It's great for DOgs you don't have a PM feature but anyone disagreeing with him under their DS name here is just asking for trouble.

You may not like that as a reason but I think a lot of people feel like that.


A very good point.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 54

Postby Guestjj » Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:24 pm

jp761 wrote:
Guest wrote:
jp761 wrote:@Goodwife Why guilty conscience you ask.

Hiding the reason why they got permanent banned is one possible, as it could possibly be found in post history. Also if they are active on DS now but don't want anyone who posts on Dogs to see what they post on DS.

Basically whatever way you look at it, it all looks like someone who is hiding and being soft.


You're like a kid trying to provoke someone into a response by calling them names. It's pathetic from a grown man.
Name calling. lol Don't make me laugh my so called name calling in these posts is very tame, it barely even qualifies.

:thumbsup:


Oooooooooo!!

The big man's got really bad insults tucked away in his armoury.

I'm feart!!!!
User avatar
Guestjj
 

PreviousNext

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests