NastyNickers wrote:Guest wrote:NastyNickers wrote:Enlighten me. What have I lied about? And what does that post prove? That I use 'cunt' a little too casually?
I'm beginning to think I'm just being used as a substitute punch bag. Can't say this shit on DS, so coming here and chucking it all at me in your frustration.
You lied that you'd called only the McCann supporters cunts, claimed you'd been equally nasty to both sides as you're so
neutral, Switzerland have been on line demanding you stop misrepresenting what
neutral means.
In your case it means you pretend you're the even handed poster but at the same time get plenty of digs in about the "supporters" . You're way more obvious than you seem to think you are. You're one of the "I only want justice for maddie" posters claiming you're not obsessed, and
only want the truth while logging in here to slag off anyone you think supports them. Your hissy fit when Jp suggested you tell people who you are when you're slagging posters off gave it away and your anger when the threads are locked.
BIB, bit hypocritical you whining "can't say this shit on ds/punchbags", because you don't say this shit on ds either and have used penny etc as your punchbag here calling her a cunt.
You know, if you're going to chuck accusations at me, can you back 'em up? I have absolute no fucking idea what you're referring to when you mention my anger at a thread being closed and the hissyfit at JP. Did these even happen?
You're making a hell of a lot of assumptions about me and my opinion (wrong assumptions, you're way off the mark). The original point and opinion I made about the McCann thread has been totally lost along the way, but proved over and over. You just can't make any comment on it without being shoved into either a 'pro' or 'anti' bracket. And nastiness and name calling is rife on all sides.
Different guest but I'll do it.
jp761 wrote:
There should be a rule, if a poster is going to go on and on about the McCann subject and 'denigrate' other posters, they should at least announce who they are on DS.
If someone posted in a McCann thread and it isn't established who they are on DS, it really isn't a level playing field(yep people could lie, but hopefully not)
The McCann subject is a very emotive one, and obviously there have been HUGE numbers of posts about it. This is why with this particular subject, it's only right that everyone knows exactly who a poster is on DS. This is my view and I'm sticking to it.
NastyNickers wrote:
This is getting quite ridiculous. Has anyone actually posted any wild theories or anything on here? I haven't seen any. I've seen very little discussion about the actual case (except from 'space fullstop space' guest, who is posting in favour of the McCanns without any wild theories.).
Presuming someone is a conspiracy theorist because they don't like the posting style of Penny Crayon, Benjamini, and HappyNes is pretty ridiculous with no other evidence.