cobaye22 wrote:Speaking of murderers, Gilbertoo has finally killed the 'Reactions' thread.
His final scream into the abyss -
"Why? This is a discussion forum so people lodging an anonymous and ambiguous disagreement with no extra context or explanation isn't what makes a discussion a discussion. I used this forum for over 10yrs perfectly fine - was able to have discussions, disagreements, even arguments. I like to think that I've learnt a few things since my time here - reactions now massively dumb down discussion and I and others won't learn much if our comments are only met with anonymous "reactions"."
Guest wrote:Just ignore the idiots, Knickers. They were having a go at Jane doh yesterday and now it's your turn. They'll get bored soon enough.
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:I will take your word for it guest.
Not.
Is it ever worth trying to explain something to people who will never understand? Is it ever worth arguing/ disagreeing?
The best thing to do is. Know you're own thoughts and experiences. Do what you're good at. Be who you are.
Off your head again halo joe?
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Just ignore the idiots, Knickers. They were having a go at Jane doh yesterday and now it's your turn. They'll get bored soon enough.
Omg! Someone dared to criticise Jane Doh
You've earned some brownie-nose points for this post though dibbly
Guest wrote:Reading threads but not posting you get a different perspective. There are a handful of hardcore posters who make crazy theories and insult each other but most posters were having a sensible discussion.
Guest wrote:Nasty Nickers you posted abuse about anyone you felt was a McCann supporter now you're back tracking like your arse is on fire, claiming you're not on any one side. Your posts about Penny, Happynes etc went on and on you posted once, ONCE about kingspawn and Sunnygirl. You've posted supporting AMAL as well on here, so yes one sided my arse. Dress it up how you like most people can see through your bullshit, and I'm none of the other guests either this is my first post in a couple of weeks sure admin can confirm that for you. Nice to see other people waking up to you and your fake "reasonable poster" "don't bully me" crap.
Victoria wrote:NastyNickers wrote:Victoria wrote:Here he is discussing Jeremy Bamber and i have no idea why he's talking in an American accent as he comes from Essex.
Well. He's certainly an odd one. I don't even know why people would want to immerse themselves in these kinds of things. What do you gain from believing in/concocting such shit?
I'm not sure Nicks.
The feeling of being important or filling a void in their lives.
This man started out writing to Jeremy Bamber and then visiting him.
I think Bamber at first saw him as being useful to helping him having his conviction quashed, but then he realised he was doing more harm than good and distanced himself from him.
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Just ignore the idiots, Knickers. They were having a go at Jane doh yesterday and now it's your turn. They'll get bored soon enough.
Omg! Someone dared to criticise Jane Doh
You've earned some brownie-nose points for this post though dibbly
NastyNickers wrote:Guest wrote:Nasty Nickers you posted abuse about anyone you felt was a McCann supporter now you're back tracking like your arse is on fire, claiming you're not on any one side. Your posts about Penny, Happynes etc went on and on you posted once, ONCE about kingspawn and Sunnygirl. You've posted supporting AMAL as well on here, so yes one sided my arse. Dress it up how you like most people can see through your bullshit, and I'm none of the other guests either this is my first post in a couple of weeks sure admin can confirm that for you. Nice to see other people waking up to you and your fake "reasonable poster" "don't bully me" crap.
More lies. I have never defended Amaral. A quick search for 'Amaral' shows that. This is the only time I've mentioned him:
"I know that Amaral is a dodgy bastard, but I've never heard anything about the Supreme Court, or lawyers/doctors/politicians/judges."
viewtopic.php?f=22&t=43320&p=1268749&hilit=amaral&sid=867a2d5d8ac00c6aeaa8b407a9adebeb#p1268749
And here's the search so you can check yourself:
search.php?st=0&sk=t&sd=d&sr=posts&keywords=amaral&start=15
And to clarify. I'm not backtracking. I've never changed my opinion. I'm just denying the opinion you are all trying to force on me. I've posted links to my initial points, I've posted links that disprove your accusations. You all keep posting your opinion on my opinion as if they were facts, with little quotes of mine either taken out of context or paired with completely different posts.
You're behaving a lot like the anti-McCann nuts you despise so much.
Guest wrote:is Shalamara that weird Dox guy?
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Just ignore the idiots, Knickers. They were having a go at Jane doh yesterday and now it's your turn. They'll get bored soon enough.
Omg! Someone dared to criticise Jane Doh
You've earned some brownie-nose points for this post though dibbly
Hows Pet Squeaky? still phoning up women from forums?
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Just ignore the idiots, Knickers. They were having a go at Jane doh yesterday and now it's your turn. They'll get bored soon enough.
Omg! Someone dared to criticise Jane Doh
You've earned some brownie-nose points for this post though dibbly
Guest wrote:They can criticise her all day long. .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests