DS and DTV Part 57.

Big Threads

DS and DTV Part 57.

Postby Disappointed Guest » Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:34 pm

Doomlord2 wrote:Sigh. I noticed because I was on my profile page to look at the discussions section. I wasn't checking reactions specifically, it was noticable that it was around 300 odd more. I didn't check them the night before.

Can't you at least pretend you checked them? That way guests can keep having a pop at you. Come on, be a sport!
User avatar
Disappointed Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby Guest » Wed Apr 19, 2017 2:17 pm

Disappointed Guest wrote:
Doomlord2 wrote:Sigh. I noticed because I was on my profile page to look at the discussions section. I wasn't checking reactions specifically, it was noticable that it was around 300 odd more. I didn't check them the night before.

Can't you at least pretend you checked them? That way guests can keep having a pop at you. Come on, be a sport!



Every one has a peek, I don't care who you are. Post in a McCann thread with anything other than "they did it!!" and you'll find your dislikes sky rocket, mine went from 44 disagrees to 301 over night after the last McCann thread. I posted 4 times in total, and had a total of 22 downvotes, next day log in, 301. Went and locked at the locked thread and the amount of dislikes on my post hadn't changed, so some of those nutjobs are going to those posters and down voting anything they can find on them. Not just that but there must be a group of them doing it, one person couldn't do that on their own unless they were up all night.

But their not obsessed :off head: :off head:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby Guest » Wed Apr 19, 2017 2:32 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Posters that call other posters noobs are an embarrassment :oops:


I would agree usually, but in this case she (minnie) was referring to the influx of Anti McCann Theorists who only joined ds so they could post their bizzare bollocks.



It's still embarrassing, it doesn't matter what people are posting about calling then noobs is well cringey.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby guest » Wed Apr 19, 2017 3:06 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Posters that call other posters noobs are an embarrassment :oops:


I would agree usually, but in this case she (minnie) was referring to the influx of Anti McCann Theorists who only joined ds so they could post their bizzare bollocks.



It's still embarrassing, it doesn't matter what people are posting about calling then noobs is well cringey.


I find the mccann posters like omg like so super cringe. like seriously, like dude.
User avatar
guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby jp761 » Wed Apr 19, 2017 3:31 pm

I've been reading the recent stuff, regarding 'disagrees'. Let's break it down.

It has been said, people who claim they don't care about 'disagrees' are annoying, and those who pretend they're above it all are also, annoying. So I wonder, who the hell isn't annoying then? :pmsl:

Those who never ever talk about 'disagrees'? Those who really don't care? Lets address the former, yep it's safe to say those who never talk about it, probably don't care. As for the latter, on most occasions trying to judge which FMs 'care', is purely subjective, and a matter of personal opinion. Unless a FM blatantly does care, Gilbertoo, for example.

The poster going on at Doomlord2 sounds obsessed about it all, imo, a prime example of pretending not to care. Haha. Some people really do need to lay-off with the deflecting.

And, surely those who search through old posts 'disagreeing' 300 times overnight, or similar, are the saddest FMs of all.
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 3119
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:01 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby Viper » Wed Apr 19, 2017 3:53 pm

Canucklehead wrote:
Guest wrote:I actually think Jason Tosskins was totally right on this. For too long there's been posters on DS who think their shit don't stink and that they are 'popular'. If you speak up against one of them, their internet pals pile in like they are still in the playground. Minnie especially seems to believe her own hype going on about 'noobs' considering she's also a 'noob' compared to many herself.

The whining and whinging of Penny, Minnie, Sorcha Healey, Gilbertoo and others just shows them up for what they are- jumped up cliquey twats that believe their own hype and don't realise a lot of us lurkers think they just seem like self important waffling arse holes.


Although I wouldn't include all the same names as you mentioned, I agree. Being perceived as popular or well-liked online seems quite important to some posters. Of course it's nice when you go to the effort of making a funny that people give you a laugh reaction, but it shouldn't be the main reason for posting. It's not a competition.


It is absolutely a competition. Try to get as many sjws banned from their own forum before inevitably falling on own sword. Definate competition.
No one likes SJWs.
User avatar
Viper
 
Posts: 5747
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 7:32 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby Viper » Wed Apr 19, 2017 3:55 pm

Guest wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Doomlord2 wrote:ClaireA - tango down
Sammy1999 - jailed again.

With regards to reactions - it seems I have an enemy! Someone has been back cataloguing my posts for disagrees. Odd behaviour.


I don't quite understand why someone would do that. :gigglesnshit: Doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to react to a post that's months or years old and the poster is unlikely to even see it.

Seems obvious to me....... because it gets a reaction, as doomlord's post proves

Everyone whining about it, like Keyser, Charlie1, Gilbertoo et al only has themselves to blame if they get more sad faces. Yes, the reaction buttons are childish and shit, but the funniest thing is the reactions themselves - particularly from those who claim not to care, or pretend they're above it all

:thumbsup: x10,000
No one likes SJWs.
User avatar
Viper
 
Posts: 5747
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 7:32 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby Canucklehead » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:03 pm

Viper wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Guest wrote:I actually think Jason Tosskins was totally right on this. For too long there's been posters on DS who think their shit don't stink and that they are 'popular'. If you speak up against one of them, their internet pals pile in like they are still in the playground. Minnie especially seems to believe her own hype going on about 'noobs' considering she's also a 'noob' compared to many herself.

The whining and whinging of Penny, Minnie, Sorcha Healey, Gilbertoo and others just shows them up for what they are- jumped up cliquey twats that believe their own hype and don't realise a lot of us lurkers think they just seem like self important waffling arse holes.


Although I wouldn't include all the same names as you mentioned, I agree. Being perceived as popular or well-liked online seems quite important to some posters. Of course it's nice when you go to the effort of making a funny that people give you a laugh reaction, but it shouldn't be the main reason for posting. It's not a competition.


It is absolutely a competition. Try to get as many sjws banned from their own forum before inevitably falling on own sword. Definate competition.


Congratulations? :dunno:
User avatar
Canucklehead
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:59 am

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby Viper » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:06 pm

Canucklehead wrote:
Viper wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Guest wrote:I actually think Jason Tosskins was totally right on this. For too long there's been posters on DS who think their shit don't stink and that they are 'popular'. If you speak up against one of them, their internet pals pile in like they are still in the playground. Minnie especially seems to believe her own hype going on about 'noobs' considering she's also a 'noob' compared to many herself.

The whining and whinging of Penny, Minnie, Sorcha Healey, Gilbertoo and others just shows them up for what they are- jumped up cliquey twats that believe their own hype and don't realise a lot of us lurkers think they just seem like self important waffling arse holes.


Although I wouldn't include all the same names as you mentioned, I agree. Being perceived as popular or well-liked online seems quite important to some posters. Of course it's nice when you go to the effort of making a funny that people give you a laugh reaction, but it shouldn't be the main reason for posting. It's not a competition.


It is absolutely a competition. Try to get as many sjws banned from their own forum before inevitably falling on own sword. Definate competition.


Congratulations? :dunno:


Thank you.
No one likes SJWs.
User avatar
Viper
 
Posts: 5747
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 7:32 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby cobaye22 » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:49 pm

njp's shaping up to take on Bolly in the 'Basic Beliefs' thread.
Could be bout of the century. Big Daddy vs Giant Haystacks.

He's warming up with zingers like this

"You may rest assured that my choice of the word "mangling" was not an attempt to humiliate. It's just a word I use.

If I've constructed a multi-post reply, I am very aware of the possibility of messing up the quotes, so I always use the "preview" function to check before posting. For the avoidance of doubt, that is a statement of fact, rather than another lesson."
User avatar
cobaye22
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:53 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby jra » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:57 pm

Doomlord2 wrote:ClaireA - tango down
Sammy1999 - jailed again.

With regards to reactions - it seems I have an enemy! Someone has been back cataloguing my posts for disagrees. Odd behaviour.


You wouldn't be the first one.

On a similar note, I got a disagree for writing 'deleted post' (after the original post had been deleted) and somebody disagreed with how tall I was.
User avatar
jra
 
Posts: 6297
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:02 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby Guest » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:14 pm

guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Posters that call other posters noobs are an embarrassment :oops:


I would agree usually, but in this case she (minnie) was referring to the influx of Anti McCann Theorists who only joined ds so they could post their bizzare bollocks.



It's still embarrassing, it doesn't matter what people are posting about calling then noobs is well cringey.


I find the mccann posters like omg like so super cringe. like seriously, like dude.


How cool :gigglesnshit:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby Vicky » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:24 pm

Why has someone on DS started a thread saying he'll be sad when David Attenborough dies?

It seems a bit odd. Image
54 Titles And Still Going Strong.

W.A.T.P.
User avatar
Vicky
Site Admin
 
Posts: 63409
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:26 pm
Location: Ibrox Stadium, Edmiston Drive, Glasgow.

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby Junglejayne » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:29 pm

Victoria wrote:Why has someone on DS started a thread saying he'll be sad when David Attenborough dies?

It seems a bit odd. Image


Image

They should be beheaded for treason or blasphemy or summat else like that :grrrrr:
User avatar
Junglejayne
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2015 4:53 pm

Re: DS and DTV Part 56.

Postby Junglejayne » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:32 pm

Guest wrote:
guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
It's still embarrassing, it doesn't matter what people are posting about calling then noobs is well cringey.


I find the mccann posters like omg like so super cringe. like seriously, like dude.


How cool :gigglesnshit:


Image
User avatar
Junglejayne
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2015 4:53 pm

Next

Return to The Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest