This is a post from netcurtains I remember:
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_41082595
Vam wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Latest McCann thread closed, well done Nessie and pricky primer. It was going nowhere anyway. Don't know what poor Penny will do with her days now, and doubtful we will see unHappyNes around much anymore. Primer of course is too much of a dickhead to stay away too long.
Oh dear, still licking your wounds?
Plenty of casualties and red faces after those threads.
What wounds?
The only real casualty in that thread (& others like it) is Nes' literacy.
Vam wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Latest McCann thread closed, well done Nessie and pricky primer. It was going nowhere anyway. Don't know what poor Penny will do with her days now, and doubtful we will see unHappyNes around much anymore. Primer of course is too much of a dickhead to stay away too long.
Oh dear, still licking your wounds?
Plenty of casualties and red faces after those threads.
What wounds?
The only real casualty in that thread (& others like it) is Nes' literacy.
Guest wrote:Someone mentioned Face_Ache so I looked, never realised shes a bit of a stunner. Good poster as well from what I've seen.
Gerst Guest wrote:This is a post from netcurtains I remember:
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_41082595
Guest wrote:I'm amused at people on DS falling over themselves to show off how fair and enlightened they are.....over some crap manufactured nonstory about a painted bint who works in ASDA (and who just coincidentally happens to have a sideline business of painting other likeminded bints )
jp761 wrote:I'm not actually unpopular though. It only takes a couple of prick guests going into sleep and repeat mode, saying stuff over and over again... to create a fallacy of someone being unpopular.
And for the record, no one ever takes me on, I take them on, as I've said before I only get into it with the FMs who have a "rep" for getting into it themselves. Those who are no shrinking violets. Sure, I've made the occasional mistake, everyone does it, no one is right all of the time. I'll debate and discuss in a mature manner with anyone though, if that's how the other person is replying to me. It's easy to tell what a FMs intentions actually are.
It appears Lucy is a another example of me knowing who is somewhat dodgy. But personally I have no problem with her, or whoever it may be. I still see her as being generally good value, as a poster.
NastyNickers wrote:
I'm not sure if I've mentioned it before, but I friggin love netcurtains.
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_86411219
"Maybe you mix in different circles but if any of my friends said "I have implemented these scientific principles into my everyday thinking and actions" I'd worry that they'd been reading some dodgy self help book and I'd buy them a large vodka."
Totally fangirling all over her today
Edit to add Stoatie to my fangirl twirls for this corker in reply to Retford (page 13, post 306):
"Jesus Christ, this is like bad automated customer service. Just FYI, I didn't press "1" for pre-recorded garbage. I held for an operator because I like talking to people and actually conversing. And I'm buggered if I'm typing all those questions out again on a phone keypad."
Frankly wrote:Gerst Guest wrote:This is a post from netcurtains I remember:
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_41082595
Another fan here.
Guest wrote:jp761 wrote:I'm not actually unpopular though. It only takes a couple of prick guests going into sleep and repeat mode, saying stuff over and over again... to create a fallacy of someone being unpopular.
And for the record, no one ever takes me on, I take them on, as I've said before I only get into it with the FMs who have a "rep" for getting into it themselves. Those who are no shrinking violets. Sure, I've made the occasional mistake, everyone does it, no one is right all of the time. I'll debate and discuss in a mature manner with anyone though, if that's how the other person is replying to me. It's easy to tell what a FMs intentions actually are.
It appears Lucy is a another example of me knowing who is somewhat dodgy. But personally I have no problem with her, or whoever it may be. I still see her as being generally good value, as a poster.
Vam wrote:Frankly wrote:Gerst Guest wrote:This is a post from netcurtains I remember:
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_41082595
Another fan here.
I often imagine her home being filled with laughter, morning, noon and night.
(...thanks to the Guesty up there, btw!... )
NastyNickers wrote:I'm not sure if I've mentioned it before, but I friggin love netcurtains.
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... t_86411219
"Maybe you mix in different circles but if any of my friends said "I have implemented these scientific principles into my everyday thinking and actions" I'd worry that they'd been reading some dodgy self help book and I'd buy them a large vodka."
Totally fangirling all over her today
Edit to add Stoatie to my fangirl twirls for this corker in reply to Retford (page 13, post 306):
"Jesus Christ, this is like bad automated customer service. Just FYI, I didn't press "1" for pre-recorded garbage. I held for an operator because I like talking to people and actually conversing. And I'm buggered if I'm typing all those questions out again on a phone keypad."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests