Vam wrote:Mushymanrob discussing women's/kids' fashion is rather disturbing in itself, tbh.
Yeah, he is creepy.
Vam wrote:Mushymanrob discussing women's/kids' fashion is rather disturbing in itself, tbh.
Foxy wrote:NastyNickers wrote:Foxy wrote:
I remember my daughter when she was younger wanting 'sexy' underwear, like a bra top and skimpy knickers. She was about 6 or 7 at the time. I was horrified that they even made it her size. I'm probably old-fashioned but children don't seem to stay kids for long now. As for these pop stars who perform to a target audience of young teens dressed in a sexualised manner, I don't like it. Someone earlier in this thread described it as freedom to dress how they want, and compared it to the strict rules of Islam where woman have to wear the burka. I imagine this 'dress code' is imposed on them almost as strictly as covering up is imposed on Muslim women. They probably don't have much of a choice.
I have never seen what I'd consider to be skimpy underwear for kids that young. Just bog standard cotton. I don't necessarily think that children are growing older quicker, if anything I think it's longer now with them having to stay in school to 18 and such.
I don't think it's any different now as to when I was 10, in regards to what the pop stars are wearing. And I don't think Little Mix were over 'sext' in their clothing choice either.
My daughter is 19 now, so I'm talking about 12 years ago. This was it 'Little Miss Naughty', apparently banned now.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2887483.stm
Odessa Steps wrote:Vam wrote:Mushymanrob discussing women's/kids' fashion is rather disturbing in itself, tbh.
Yeah, he is creepy.
Mrs P not logged in wrote:It would be better if people were a bit more accurate with what they are claiming posters are saying though. Otherwise we might as well all just make up random shit and attribute it to whichever poster we dislike most. I can't begin to imagine why I got lumped in with mushymanrob. My opinion in that thread is miles away from what he's posted.
Vam wrote:Mushymanrob discussing women's/kids' fashion is rather disturbing in itself, tbh.
Guest wrote:Mrs P not logged in wrote:It would be better if people were a bit more accurate with what they are claiming posters are saying though. Otherwise we might as well all just make up random shit and attribute it to whichever poster we dislike most. I can't begin to imagine why I got lumped in with mushymanrob. My opinion in that thread is miles away from what he's posted.
By Jove, I think you've got it. Welcome to the thread. It's what they do.
guest wrote:Vam wrote:Mushymanrob discussing women's/kids' fashion is rather disturbing in itself, tbh.
He is the arbiter of morality and not a weirdo in the least.
Pop stars in their mid 20s showing a bit of thigh and cleavage = wrong because it promotes sexuality to their young teenage fans.
Grown women wearing schoolgirl uniforms as fun dress up = immoral because it sexualizes schoolgirls.
Actually having sex with a barely legal schoolgirl when you are 40 and work in her school = AWWWRIGHT and if you don't like it you are just jealous of his hot young gf.
Dunno why he's going on about it so much. According to him he has no sex drive at all.
Guest wrote:Mrs P not logged in wrote:It would be better if people were a bit more accurate with what they are claiming posters are saying though. Otherwise we might as well all just make up random shit and attribute it to whichever poster we dislike most. I can't begin to imagine why I got lumped in with mushymanrob. My opinion in that thread is miles away from what he's posted.
By Jove, I think you've got it. Welcome to the thread. It's what they do.
NastyNickers wrote:I dunno. My two boppers are only young (5 and 2) so it's not really something I've had to actually implement, yet. I see the point, but its just too similar to the whole "don't wear skimpy clothes because rape" argument. And it's something I don't really agree with, but I can understand.
I plan to just teach mine what clothes are appropriate in the right situation, and help them to make the right decision. Similar to my own upbringing.
That's the crux of the issue he can't do 'attention'. Rather than talking crap about fashion and god knows what else, the GP should be his port of call.Vam wrote:guest wrote:Vam wrote:Mushymanrob discussing women's/kids' fashion is rather disturbing in itself, tbh.
He is the arbiter of morality and not a weirdo in the least.
Pop stars in their mid 20s showing a bit of thigh and cleavage = wrong because it promotes sexuality to their young teenage fans.
Grown women wearing schoolgirl uniforms as fun dress up = immoral because it sexualizes schoolgirls.
Actually having sex with a barely legal schoolgirl when you are 40 and work in her school = AWWWRIGHT and if you don't like it you are just jealous of his hot young gf.
Dunno why he's going on about it so much. According to him he has no sex drive at all.
Thanks for bringing that last bit to my attention!
I've sometimes wondered why a bloke in his mid to late forties (??) would come up with a saccharine, twee username like that. Given what he's openly posted about his teen girlfriend, it's not really a stretch to figure out, I guess.....and then my mind (bizarrely!) pictures a couch overflowing with cheap, garish, garage-bought stuffed toys and teddy bears, and a young voice calling out his username
This guy has no business to be dispensing advice on women's fashion
NastyNickers wrote:Foxy wrote:
I remember my daughter when she was younger wanting 'sexy' underwear, like a bra top and skimpy knickers. She was about 6 or 7 at the time. I was horrified that they even made it her size. I'm probably old-fashioned but children don't seem to stay kids for long now. As for these pop stars who perform to a target audience of young teens dressed in a sexualised manner, I don't like it. Someone earlier in this thread described it as freedom to dress how they want, and compared it to the strict rules of Islam where woman have to wear the burka. I imagine this 'dress code' is imposed on them almost as strictly as covering up is imposed on Muslim women. They probably don't have much of a choice.
I don't necessarily think that children are growing older quicker, if anything I think it's longer now with them having to stay in school to 18 and such.
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Mrs P not logged in wrote:It would be better if people were a bit more accurate with what they are claiming posters are saying though. Otherwise we might as well all just make up random shit and attribute it to whichever poster we dislike most. I can't begin to imagine why I got lumped in with mushymanrob. My opinion in that thread is miles away from what he's posted.
By Jove, I think you've got it. Welcome to the thread. It's what they do.
Hi Gilbertoo. Happy to provide screenshots if it shuts you up once and for all.
jra wrote:NastyNickers wrote:Foxy wrote:
I remember my daughter when she was younger wanting 'sexy' underwear, like a bra top and skimpy knickers. She was about 6 or 7 at the time. I was horrified that they even made it her size. I'm probably old-fashioned but children don't seem to stay kids for long now. As for these pop stars who perform to a target audience of young teens dressed in a sexualised manner, I don't like it. Someone earlier in this thread described it as freedom to dress how they want, and compared it to the strict rules of Islam where woman have to wear the burka. I imagine this 'dress code' is imposed on them almost as strictly as covering up is imposed on Muslim women. They probably don't have much of a choice.
I don't necessarily think that children are growing older quicker, if anything I think it's longer now with them having to stay in school to 18 and such.
Children are definitely growing up faster than they used to and you can leave school at 16, but nowadays there seem to be certain conditions attached.
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Mrs P not logged in wrote:It would be better if people were a bit more accurate with what they are claiming posters are saying though. Otherwise we might as well all just make up random shit and attribute it to whichever poster we dislike most. I can't begin to imagine why I got lumped in with mushymanrob. My opinion in that thread is miles away from what he's posted.
By Jove, I think you've got it. Welcome to the thread. It's what they do.
Hi Gilbertoo. Happy to provide screenshots if it shuts you up once and for all.
guest wrote:Is this really the place to be discussing women's underwear?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests