Junglejayne wrote:NastyNickers wrote:Junglejayne wrote:Guest wrote:JJ, I think you're totally wrong about HappyNes. I lurked in all of the McCann threads and Nes was snide and nasty from day one. Not just every so often, she had a sneering unpleasant posting style every single day. I don't get how anyone could miss that. She was a menace.
By your logic SJW Hunter (the absolute psycho weirdo) must have pushed your buttons for you to have such a negative view of him. Nope, he was just a massive tosser - just like HappyNes. IMO.
Oh FGS, there's no doubt she upset people and in a lot of cases she was right in the things she challenged and there are probably a lot of bruised egos, (I imaging you know what I'm talking about
) I've never denied that but as has been said, she's not the only one and not the worst type of posting
we've seen.
Come back when you can show us why she is the devil incarnate that she's been made out to be and I will find a post that beats it hand down without all the excitement hers gets.
And no, by your logic - I would be spitting names and insults about SJW Hunter at every opportunity and in the next breath comparing him and accusing someone else here of being him and pretending I don't think mud sticks. I'm not doing any of that, no one here is.
BIB:
you've seen Jayne. Not we. Opinion on a poster is subjective. There may be people
you think are worse, but not everyone has to agree with that.
I don't think HappyNes was the worst poster I've ever seen, but
for me, she was right up there as one of the worst in the McCann threads. Yes, some of the points she made were right, but it was the delivery that I had an issue with.
In my opinion, a good poster is one who can say and explain their view without resorting to petty insults, sneering, ridicule and total misinterpretation of others points. A bad poster is one that does use the insults, sneering and ridicule, and ignores the content of the post and instead insults the poster.
I thought HappyNes fell into the bad poster category.
You're completely innocent of all this of course. One post and I'll match it. Or you can choose not to play the cards Vam so subtly dealt and project all this onto me. If you genuinely believe opinion is subjective Happy wouldn't be such a target would she?
Did I ever claim innocence? I try to be reasonable when I'm having a discussion with someone. But yeah, I've also insulted people.
One post and you'll match it? I'm fully aware other people are also arseholes, Jayne. Matching it won't prove shit.
Of course I genuinely believe opinion is subjective, but it doesn't mean people won't hold similar opinions. And other people held the same view as I did about HappyNes. She's a target as much JRA is a target, or JP, or Retford, or Cornish, or Arteious, or anyone else who regularly gets negative comments on here.